Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Several Old PPI Claims


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4390 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys. My first post on here after reading for weeks and a big thank you for all the help and advice offered to everyone.

 

I have several credit card accounts, some going back to 1999 with PPI on most are closed, there are no defaults or outstanding live issues just old charges ( I will start threads elsewhere as relevant)

 

I also have all my old statements (except one or two) from the begining so from that point I believe I don't need to send out a SAR I also don't think I need to ask for a CCA but will be happy to if the more experienced here think I should.

 

I have also done the excel spreedsheet for compound interest for these cards so am one step closer to getting some much needed money back.

 

I think from my reading that the same path is followed pretty much for the reclaims but what I can't seem to find is a template/ example of the letter I should send to start the reclaim process.

It's more than possible I have seen one and not recognised it so would be very greatful of a pointer in that direction.

 

I'm fairly confident of a result with the PPI, not as much with charges.

 

The card /Loan details are

 

HFC revolving Credit account (2000 to 2002) I have a copy of the agreement with pre crossed boxes.

 

Peoples Bank 1999 to 2002 (changed to Citibank in 2001)

 

Capital One 2001 to 2007 (PPI cancelled 2006)

 

Lloyds TSB (2001 to present day (PPI canceled 2005)) I have phoned Lloyds on their dedicated PPI line so my complain with them is logged and I am expecting some kind of a reponse from them next week according to the operative and am hoping this route will be fairly easy (yes I know but I am trying to be optomistic)

 

I will continue researching as time allows but would be very greatful of any pointers to see if I am doing the right things.

 

Many Thanks for the forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

There isn't a template letter for a ppi reclaim.

 

All you need to do is send a copy of the spreadsheet and a completed fos consumer questionnaire to the lender with a simple, brief letter requesting the refund. The fos questionnaire is available from the fos website.

 

Also have a look at the examples in Appendix 2 of the FSA handbook (It is in the PPI Stickies) and have a read of the case study PDFs on the fos website.

 

Sounds like your on your on your way with the rest of it

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which spreadsheet did you use? If it is just the one with compound interest, you need to use the one fosrunning credit one, It is in the stickies above. There is not really a templete letter, you need to include copies of statments, FOS questionnaire, and a brief letter, just along the lines of PPI complaint, please find included. Am sure IMS will be along to guide you. Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which spreadsheet did you use? If it is just the one with compound interest, you need to use the one fosrunning credit one, It is in the stickies above. There is not really a templete letter, you need to include copies of statments, FOS questionnaire, and a brief letter, just along the lines of PPI complaint, please find included. Am sure IMS will be along to guide you. Good luck

 

Candyapple the one I used was CISheet v101xls (can't post a link yet) I was calculating charges and expected it to be the same.

Do I need to do the FosrunningPPI one? Whats the difference?

Edited by Bakerboy27
Typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the CIS sheet is what a court would award you, it has much higher interest component. It is the one called FOS running, it is for credit cards, and follows the FOS guidelines for awarding redress. You do need all your statments, as you have to input dates, spending and credit for each month, and balances. Seems to tally with what banks offer though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Question about the spreadsheets, one of the first things on there is the interest rate, now this is either the cash interest rate or the merchandise rate and it changes over time so do you just use the latest figure available or do you have to do a seperate sheet for each rate change and which figure is it ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Had some good fortune on these reclaims, Been working away for a week and got home to three upheld complaints! RESULT !!! claims from Capital One, Citi (from when they were peoples bank) and First direct.

Citi said they couldn't find my details with the information I sent so I sent a couple of copy statements with the exact same details on and they managed to find them then. They must try it on with loads ofpeople to get them to back off. I think it stinks really and makes me even more determined to do my bit in changing the banking system.

Donation when I receive the money to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...