Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
    • Send them a letter of claim straightaway. No point hanging around. Given 14 days in the letter of claim and if they haven't paid you by then, issue the claim on day 15. The amount of time is more than adequate for them to get going. Post your draft letter of claim here. A look at. Then log onto the MoneyClaim website and start preparing your claim and post your particulars of claim here for us to have a look at. Don't bluff. No point in it.
    • That's what we thought, but the store manager is inferring that, as the jeweller we used was not a member of the NJA, no one  would give what he said, any credence. The Jeweller we used is in fact, a long established, well respected company, with 2 store and rather than just being a retailer, they craft the most exquisite jewellery inhouse!  I wish my Fiancé would have bought from them rather than H Samuel! Do you think we do need to get another report from and NJA accredited Jeweller ?
    • Really pleased that you won. UKPC know that you have supremacy of contract but still they persist because so many motorists blindly pay them.   Muppets.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4465 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I used to live in the Western Congestion Zone and so had to pay the residents discount of about 80p a day in order to drive to work. The Western Zone was abolished on 25th December 2010. unfortunately I was not covered for the 23rd and 24th as I thought I was. This resulted in two Transport For London demands for two sperate fines.

 

I appealed to TFL immediately, they rejected the appeal. I then appealed to PATAS in February 2011 and never received a reply. I moved house in July 2011.

 

On January 6th 2012 I walked out of my new flat on Friday evening and noticed my car was clamped. I called the number written in biro on the notice plastered to the windscreen. I was clamped by bailiffs working on behalf of TFL. They said I could only deal directly with the 'assigned bailiff' who was on a mobile number and not picking up. Eventually I got through and he told me I must pay £1040 or my car would be towed, at my expense, then stored, at my expense, and then sold, if I didn't pay This was the middle of the night and TFL, PATAS, TEC and county courts were all closed. I called the police who said they couldn't do anything unless the bailiffs became violent and that bailiffs can charge pretty much what they want.

 

I didn't sleep that night and spent my time posting on forums trying to find out my rights. At 9am on Saturday morning I called TFL, explained the situation and they said the bailiffs should give me more time in order to sort this out. I called the bailiff from JBW Group, who refused to even hear what I had to say. 'I've got a live warrant and will be round in half and hour. You can get your money back through the courts' Called back TFL who then said that all charges could be refunded, but did not specify how.

 

Anyway, I was panicked and scared and so paid this bailiff. I called the TEC the next week who said I could not file an Out of Time form or anything else with the courts, as by paying, the courts involvement was ended.

 

And that's where I am now. Saw a pro-bono lawyer who said, write to TFL. But I really have no clue as to where to begin in reclaiming my money. It's all very, very stressful. It's caused particular hardship as I was made redundant last August and had to use the last of my redundancy payment for the bailiff. God knows what would have happened if I hadn't had that.

 

I've just paid £1040 for a £1.80 underpayment of CCharge, it's beyond obscene. Does anyone have the slightest idea how I can go about getting this money back??

Edited by wombleingfree
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is outrageous and a definite over charging of fees by JBW (not surprised)

Have you contacted JBW for a list of fee's and charges made with regards to this seizure.

They should of left you paperwork with regards to the seizure of your vehicle.

 

I dont usually advise any one calling the bailiff, however on this occasion I think a need is called for. When you do try and record the call.

Request he sends a breakdown of all his fees and the charges and list the times and dates that these charges accrued.

i would also write and make a complaint to the authority who passed this on for bailiff action.

 

I cannot understand why the TEC refused to accept an OOT..

 

Hang tight as there will be more alone to advice, Im afraid that I dont know much how the congestion charges are dealt with but there are some on here that are very good with their advise.

 

Please keep us informed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the breakdown of the charges on the 'receipt' the bailiff gave me:

 

Penalty charge and court costs: £374

 

Sending a letter £22.40

 

Levy: £188

 

'Other': £350

 

VAT: £110

 

Plus a further £1.50 for using a debit card, would've been another £40 if I'd used a credit card.

 

Total: £1039.28

 

The person I spoke to at TEC said that I couldn't file an OOT as I'd paid, and that ended the courts involvement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the breakdown of the charges on the 'receipt' the bailiff gave me:

 

Penalty charge and court costs: £374 (Have you the court papers with the fees attached?) If not ask for a copy)

 

Sending a letter £22.40 (Looks like they have charged you double for the letter)

 

Levy: £188 (thats a little high, some one else will know more what they can charge on that)

 

'Other': £350 (you need to find what 'other' is.)

 

VAT: £110 ( VAT dosnt look correct to me, but others may correct me on that)

 

Plus a further £1.50 for using a debit card, would've been another £40 if I'd used a credit card.

 

Total: £1039.28

 

The person I spoke to at TEC said that I couldn't file an OOT as I'd paid, and that ended the courts involvement.

 

I would say that these fees are way too high..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received no letters from anyone as I'd moved house. I appealed to PATAS in February, heard nothing back, moved house in July and the first I know about any of this is a clamp on my car outside my new address.

 

I had a note stuck to the car saying it was to be removed, if that's a notice of seizure? Never saw a warrant, just a receipt with my previous address on it. I've never been given any court papers either.

 

I have no idea what a levy is and have never seen one.

 

I might sound dumb, but this was all done in the middle of the night over the weekend and I had no clue what to do and there was really no one to ask except TFL the following morning who told me I could get reimbursed and the penalty 'reset', and the Police who told me that bailiffs and wheel clampers can basically charge what they like.

Edited by wombleingfree
Link to post
Share on other sites

I received no letters from anyone as I'd moved house. I appealed to PATAS in February, heard nothing back, moved house in July and the first I know about any of this is a clamp on my car outside my new address.

 

I had a note stuck to the car saying it was to be removed, if that's a notice of seizure? Never saw a warrant, just a receipt with my previous address on it. I've never been given any court papers either.

 

I have no idea what a levy is and have never seen one.

 

I might sound dumb, but this was all done in the middle of the night over the weekend and I had no clue what to do and there was really no one to ask except TFL the following morning who told me I could get reimbursed and the penalty 'reset', and the Police who told me that bailiffs and wheel clampers can basically charge what they like.

 

It may be possible that you car was recognised during a routine check by JBW in the way of them driving around with a ANPR van.

 

OK a levy is when a bailiff visits he will carry out a levy on your property, like a guarantee that you will pay the debt owed, once he does this he gives you a time scale to pay the fee. Or you can pay it there and then without a levy being made. However if you do not pay in the allotted time scale then he can come back and take the goods he has levied against. He obviously has not done this. so no levy fee can be charged.

 

You need to contact JBW and request the following;

 

a copy of the court paperwork with fees charged.

A copy of the warrant.

A copy of the levy.

A copy of the two letters sent.

 

A full break down of fees and charges. including an explanation of what 'other' stands for.

 

The police are of course incorrect, by stating that bailiffs and wheel clamper can charge what they like, as they cannot. they have to follow guidelines on what can or cannot be charged and at what rates.

 

Once you have the break down we can then look at it to see how they have come to their total.

 

I would also request from who ever authorised the bailiffs a copy of any warrants and court papers. I would also let them know you had moved and also you had placed an appeal with PATAS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a lot of conflicting advice on what to do about this.

 

 

TFL said I can get all money from the bailiffs, and the money from the initial fine returned to me if I can prove I moved house.

 

Bailiffs have said I can get my money back 'through the courts'.

 

TEC said I cannot place an OOT statement.

 

A pro-bono lawyer's told me to write a detailed letter to TFL outlining exactly what has happened and requesting details of exactly what process I need to go through to get my money back.

 

I really don't want to communicate with the bailiffs at all. From my experience so far they are obstructive, antagonistic, and will say anything to get money out of you. I don't expect any help from them unless it's ordered by a judge or their pay-masters.

 

If PATAS had replied in a reasonable time none of this would have happened. As it stands, I still have no letter from them rejecting my appeal, let alone demands from bailiffs and warrants from courts. It's like my life got turned upside down and I was completely oblivious.

 

And all because I had the misfortune of living inside the CCharge and forgetting to pay £1.80, two days before it was abolished in my area. :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wombling Free - Unfortunately there are no forms or template letters, each person has different problems to resolve and they have to be dealt with on an invidual basis.

Edited by seanamarts
Taking out what is not relevant to the OP
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Getting back on topic, I know it's just a small amount, but I think the VAT is wrong.

VAT is charged at 20% on goods and services so try and ascertain what items VAT is charged on. Also obtain the 9 digit VAT number, sometimes shown as VRN (VAT registration number) and if they are trying to obtain "unjust enrichment" by claiming VAT on zero rated items then we shall report them to my very good friend the VAT compliance officer.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posts have been unapproved, NOT through censorship but they have been removed due to the fact that they bare no help for the OP.

 

If any one would like to discuss this then please feel free to do so by using the contact tab at the bottom of the page.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...