Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
    • Please provide advice on the following situation: I rented out my property to four students for 16 months until March 2024. Initially, the property was in very good condition, but now it needs extensive renovation. This includes redoing the bathroom, replacing the kitchen, removing wallpaper, and redecorating due to significant mold growth. The tenants also left their furniture on the grass, which is owned by the local authority. As a landlord, I've met all legal requirements. It seems the damage was caused by poor ventilation—windows were always closed, and heating wasn't used. There was also a bathroom leak fixed by reapplying silicone. I tried to claim insurance, but it was denied, citing tenant behavior as the cause by looking at the photos, which isn't covered. The deposit barely covers the repair costs, or else I'll have to pursue money claims, which I've never done before and am unsure about its legal complications or costs. Any thoughts on this?
    • The part in question was bought direct from Hotpoint (to replace a burnt door interlock and melted wiring). I'm unsure of the original retailer the machine was bought from, we're talking 5 years+ ago, but I can find out if absolutely necessary. It's one of the models that was listed on the recall list, but Hotpoint have stated for many years it wasn't an affected unit when given the serial number - I expect this is why they offered a FoC engineer visit because I sent them pictures of the (new ) burned door interlock.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome wrong account number


lew247
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4448 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a loan from Welcome Finance, well I've had several since 2003 (Stupid I know but...)

 

The one I have a problem with was taken out in 2005 and has the account number 1**9711 tota

 

I have all the paperwork for this including the one with signatures.

 

The problem I have is this

 

I took this loan out to consolidate a previous loan as I was recommended to when I had problems at the time (ill health)

Consolidation of previous loan £2K appx plus an extra bit to give us some cash plus the ppi

 

Since I took the loan out, about a year after I was reading though the PPI documentation and it confirmed my suspicions that i raised when taking out the loan that it was useless as I had claimed previously (back problems) and it didnt cover me.

 

I disputed this with them and argued and in the end I stopped paying in I think late 2006 and put the account in dispute in July 2007

 

Since then I have had various letters and some before but only recently realised all the letters had the wrong account number

 

I claimed the PPI back a few weeks ago and I also saw my credit record, and the two don't tally at all.

According to my credit records I now owe around £9K and it's been going up most months since I put it in dispute

 

Yet the letter I got from Welcome bout the PPI refund say's I now ove just over £2K

 

After the PPI refund they reckon I still own just over £2k which is possibly right and I will pay it if it is and I owe it

 

BUT in the PPI calculation, they said there was no adjustment of the loan due to previous PPI

 

I reckon there should have been as the main part of the loan £2K was to pay the previous loan off, which included PPI

 

  • Am I right or wrong?
  • Should my balance have kept increasing once I had put the loan in dispute?
  • Is there anything I can do to get them to remove the default notice on my credit file seeing I put the loan in dispute and not them?

 

Regarding the account number can someone please explain to me how they can reckon I owe £9K on an account that I know nothing about, the account number I have on my records (the paperwork I signed) has a different account number

 

I emailed them to ask about this a few days ago and also asked them about the PPI rebate frmo the prevous loan and should this loan start amount not have been adjusted, also did I get a rebate for the medicare and life insurance and also queried the wrong records on my credit record.

 

I got this responce

 

 

Dear Mr ******

 

Thank you for your email of 18 January 2012.

 

My apologies for the human error regarding your loan account number, this had been written on your documentation incorrectly.

 

The correct loan account number is: 1***771

 

Compensation relates solely to Payment Protection Insurance and in your case, whilst finding in your favour, the compensation amount has been applied to set off your remaining liabilities with Welcome Financial Services Ltd.

 

I can confirm that the compensation has nothing to do with medicare or life insurance.

 

Regards

 

Ken Wilson

 

Customer Experience Team[/qupte]

 

They totally ignored most of what I asked, and seem to reckon they can just say that they made a mistake with the account number

 

  • How can I owe something on an account number that I have not signed for?
  • Can I claim a rebate of the medicare and life insurance?
  • On a previous loan (car) Can I claim a rebate on the stupid mechanical breakdown insurance and collision call? I didnt want those as I already had AA at the time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that

Fortunately I still have all the original agreements I have signed, and a copy of most letters sent to them

and some of the ones they sent me

 

IF I sent an SAR would that be better than sending a CCA?

or do I send a CCA?

OR do I do both?

 

What I'd like is a copy of everything that they have on me, but I also want a copy of this mysterious loan agreement that I know I did not sign.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...