Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Brenda/Bruce


brenda/bruce
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6260 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you make alterations, this will only give them the excuse to drag on even longer. They will also see it as a weakness and find something else! It is exactly same bog standard letter that I got and you should stick it to them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all

Need advice on the following letter which i intend to hand in tomorrow to the court with my AQ. (Not really very good at this sort of thing )

 

Claimant Me

Defendant NatWest

 

Dear Sirs

 

I would like to bring to the attention of the Judge the fact that I have received a letter from the defendants solicitors Cobbetts, telling me thet my claim is unfounded and will not hold up in a court, but if i withdraw the claim they will make a goodwill payment of £4500 as long as I agree not to disclose any detail relating to this payment to a third party.

 

I feel their letter is to cause me the Claimant the utmost distress and most of all to intimidate me. They seem to be using this also as a ploy to delay proceedings and to waste both my time and more importantly the time of the court.

 

As a law firm i find their conduct to be appalling and underhand and i respectfully request that their defence be struck out.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

Does this sound o.k

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ignore this letter, they're just trying to make you think you've forgotten something.......typical tactics from Cobbetts!! :rolleyes:

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have received this from the court. Is it standard and what do i do.

 

Upon the Courts own motion. The Court has made this order of it's own initiative without a hearing. If you object to the order, you may make an application to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of receiving it.

 

 

1. Directions will be given in this case by the Designated Civil Judge, His Honour Judge G xxxxxxxxxx. On the 26th March at 10.30 am at Cardiff justice Centre.

 

 

2. The parties may appear in person or make written representation as to how the case should proceed provided a copy of the representation is the court and the other side at least 7 working days prior to the hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't really need to prepare anything for this as I can't honestly see the hearing actually happening. I feel they're using these prelim hearings as a scare tactic in the hope that panic will enter peoples minds and they will actually withdraw their claim.

Not going to happen I'm afraid Nat West.

I'm pretty sure you'll receive your cheque before reaching this hearing date.

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the info Brenda, the only thing that is worrying me, is i haven't received anything from Cobbetts and i haven't received an AQ yet, where as everyone else seems to have had both of these. Ah well i will just keep swotting up and just prepare myself just in case Cobbetts decide to turn up, i don't want to be caught off guard. Also i found this yesterday might be some use to us, http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mercantile-court-cases-stays/36034-case-management-conference-13th.html?highlight=management+conference

there is quite a lot to take in but it may be handy to know, just in case we end up in court:). If i find anything else i will keep you informed :)

:)I am not an expert at this, any advice i give is from reading posts on this site, its all in here somewhere :)

 

:) If i have helped please click the scales:)

 

NatWest Settled 16th february 2007----£3902.67 All charges, costs and s.69 interest

 

MBNA- S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 25th March 2007

MBNA missed deadline, LBA for SAR sent 8th May 2007

CCA request sent 8th May 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brenda,don't know about you, but its all gone a bit quiet with my claim, i received my ammended POC the other day from the Courts,but stil not a peep out of Cobbetts, any joy with you??

 

Lee

:)I am not an expert at this, any advice i give is from reading posts on this site, its all in here somewhere :)

 

:) If i have helped please click the scales:)

 

NatWest Settled 16th february 2007----£3902.67 All charges, costs and s.69 interest

 

MBNA- S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 25th March 2007

MBNA missed deadline, LBA for SAR sent 8th May 2007

CCA request sent 8th May 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not heard anything Lee, but i do know my sister who is claiming from a different bank is also in the same court, at the same time, with the same judge as us. Now have they blocked booked because they do not think it will get that far or is the judge good at multi tasking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm hoping for the first option "because they don't think it will get that far" not sure but didn't Cardiff Courts do this in December, maybe they are fed up with all the time wasting by the banks

:)I am not an expert at this, any advice i give is from reading posts on this site, its all in here somewhere :)

 

:) If i have helped please click the scales:)

 

NatWest Settled 16th february 2007----£3902.67 All charges, costs and s.69 interest

 

MBNA- S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 25th March 2007

MBNA missed deadline, LBA for SAR sent 8th May 2007

CCA request sent 8th May 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

Have received a cheque from Cobbetts for nearly £8000 with the usual conditions, my problem is my claim is for over £10000 but because i am desperate for money at the moment i really need to cash this. Is there any way i can cash the cheque and still try to get the rest of the money from them or am i just being greedy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest peed orf

Poop!

Shame I didn't think of that! :mad:

As the offer was made "without predudice" I thought I wasn't allowed to tell the Court!!!!:?

They are still givin' me a hard time! :-x

Might be worth considering if anyone else gets an offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK

Have just read a posting from Gizmo111 which makes it clear that if i cash the check i am agreeing to full and final settlement.

After much pondering i have decided that myself and Natwest have been fighting this for too long to end this loving relationship at this stage so the fight goes on.

I take it i send the cheque back with a letter saying thanks but no thanks. My next problem is the limitations act 1980 which they keep quoting to me as my claim runs for longer than 6 years is this going to be a major problem. Any advice anyone???????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest peed orf

Hi Brenda/Bruce

Got mine this morning, they've deducted a bit for being over 6 years, and the daily interest, approx £400. What the hell, I can't spend it if I ain't got it.

So I accect.

Best of luck with whatever you chose to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...