Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Brenda/Bruce


brenda/bruce
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6260 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you make alterations, this will only give them the excuse to drag on even longer. They will also see it as a weakness and find something else! It is exactly same bog standard letter that I got and you should stick it to them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all

Need advice on the following letter which i intend to hand in tomorrow to the court with my AQ. (Not really very good at this sort of thing )

 

Claimant Me

Defendant NatWest

 

Dear Sirs

 

I would like to bring to the attention of the Judge the fact that I have received a letter from the defendants solicitors Cobbetts, telling me thet my claim is unfounded and will not hold up in a court, but if i withdraw the claim they will make a goodwill payment of £4500 as long as I agree not to disclose any detail relating to this payment to a third party.

 

I feel their letter is to cause me the Claimant the utmost distress and most of all to intimidate me. They seem to be using this also as a ploy to delay proceedings and to waste both my time and more importantly the time of the court.

 

As a law firm i find their conduct to be appalling and underhand and i respectfully request that their defence be struck out.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

Does this sound o.k

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ignore this letter, they're just trying to make you think you've forgotten something.......typical tactics from Cobbetts!! :rolleyes:

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have received this from the court. Is it standard and what do i do.

 

Upon the Courts own motion. The Court has made this order of it's own initiative without a hearing. If you object to the order, you may make an application to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of receiving it.

 

 

1. Directions will be given in this case by the Designated Civil Judge, His Honour Judge G xxxxxxxxxx. On the 26th March at 10.30 am at Cardiff justice Centre.

 

 

2. The parties may appear in person or make written representation as to how the case should proceed provided a copy of the representation is the court and the other side at least 7 working days prior to the hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't really need to prepare anything for this as I can't honestly see the hearing actually happening. I feel they're using these prelim hearings as a scare tactic in the hope that panic will enter peoples minds and they will actually withdraw their claim.

Not going to happen I'm afraid Nat West.

I'm pretty sure you'll receive your cheque before reaching this hearing date.

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the info Brenda, the only thing that is worrying me, is i haven't received anything from Cobbetts and i haven't received an AQ yet, where as everyone else seems to have had both of these. Ah well i will just keep swotting up and just prepare myself just in case Cobbetts decide to turn up, i don't want to be caught off guard. Also i found this yesterday might be some use to us, http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mercantile-court-cases-stays/36034-case-management-conference-13th.html?highlight=management+conference

there is quite a lot to take in but it may be handy to know, just in case we end up in court:). If i find anything else i will keep you informed :)

:)I am not an expert at this, any advice i give is from reading posts on this site, its all in here somewhere :)

 

:) If i have helped please click the scales:)

 

NatWest Settled 16th february 2007----£3902.67 All charges, costs and s.69 interest

 

MBNA- S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 25th March 2007

MBNA missed deadline, LBA for SAR sent 8th May 2007

CCA request sent 8th May 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brenda,don't know about you, but its all gone a bit quiet with my claim, i received my ammended POC the other day from the Courts,but stil not a peep out of Cobbetts, any joy with you??

 

Lee

:)I am not an expert at this, any advice i give is from reading posts on this site, its all in here somewhere :)

 

:) If i have helped please click the scales:)

 

NatWest Settled 16th february 2007----£3902.67 All charges, costs and s.69 interest

 

MBNA- S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 25th March 2007

MBNA missed deadline, LBA for SAR sent 8th May 2007

CCA request sent 8th May 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not heard anything Lee, but i do know my sister who is claiming from a different bank is also in the same court, at the same time, with the same judge as us. Now have they blocked booked because they do not think it will get that far or is the judge good at multi tasking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm hoping for the first option "because they don't think it will get that far" not sure but didn't Cardiff Courts do this in December, maybe they are fed up with all the time wasting by the banks

:)I am not an expert at this, any advice i give is from reading posts on this site, its all in here somewhere :)

 

:) If i have helped please click the scales:)

 

NatWest Settled 16th february 2007----£3902.67 All charges, costs and s.69 interest

 

MBNA- S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 25th March 2007

MBNA missed deadline, LBA for SAR sent 8th May 2007

CCA request sent 8th May 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

Have received a cheque from Cobbetts for nearly £8000 with the usual conditions, my problem is my claim is for over £10000 but because i am desperate for money at the moment i really need to cash this. Is there any way i can cash the cheque and still try to get the rest of the money from them or am i just being greedy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest peed orf

Poop!

Shame I didn't think of that! :mad:

As the offer was made "without predudice" I thought I wasn't allowed to tell the Court!!!!:?

They are still givin' me a hard time! :-x

Might be worth considering if anyone else gets an offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK

Have just read a posting from Gizmo111 which makes it clear that if i cash the check i am agreeing to full and final settlement.

After much pondering i have decided that myself and Natwest have been fighting this for too long to end this loving relationship at this stage so the fight goes on.

I take it i send the cheque back with a letter saying thanks but no thanks. My next problem is the limitations act 1980 which they keep quoting to me as my claim runs for longer than 6 years is this going to be a major problem. Any advice anyone???????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest peed orf

Hi Brenda/Bruce

Got mine this morning, they've deducted a bit for being over 6 years, and the daily interest, approx £400. What the hell, I can't spend it if I ain't got it.

So I accect.

Best of luck with whatever you chose to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...