Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • depends what the fees are, typically nothing can be added once judgement is passed bar litigation costs. on document retention time limits etc at least 6yrs previous must be held though many hold complete info. as for acronyms and abbreviations ideally yes they should     
    • Still have to submit a statement either system....if they fail they can only give verbal because they failed to file and serve.
    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help, Is my Deed of Guarantor valid??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4487 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Long story short here. I signed a deed recently, very naively, expecting it to only be relevant to the length of the original agreed tenancy agreement.

 

It transpires that, in fact, I am actually liable beyond that date without exception:

 

"cannot be revoked during the continuance of any further tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant"

 

and

 

"not to be revoked by, notwithstanding any alteration of the terms including increase in the amount of rent payable."

 

Yes, I am a complete twonk.

 

I am ok with the original 6 months but I am not happy with any continuation.

 

Having done a bit of homework I think the following points are pertinent to me declaring the deed null and void:

 

1) It was drawn up by the Letting Agents not the landlord, it's even on their headed paper.

 

2) I have never seen and have no copy of the Tenancy Agreement.

 

4) The Agent signed as the Landlord, despite it saying signed 'by the Landlord' and not 'on behalf of the landlord'.

 

5) We (myself and the agent) never had a witness, although there is a witness name and signature.

 

6) That 'witness' is actually the Office Manager not an unrelated third party.

 

Like I said, I'm not unreasonable and willing to honour the 6 months but from my internet investigations the deed isn't actually valid.

 

Can anyone comment? I'm desperate to get out of this as soon as I can for personal reasons.

 

Many thanks!

 

James

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say that you have never seen a copy of the tenancy agreement - have you ever signed a tenancy agreement then stating that you would be guarantor or side contract?

Did you ever fill in any applicant forms for the agent to do their checks upon?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I never saw the tenancy agreement, so I certainly never signed it or initialled it.

 

Basically, I nipped in after work the evening before my friend was due to get the keys, 31/10/10, (because at the 11th hour the agents rejected her mother as the guarantor due to low earnings) briefly read the Guarantors Deed (the Letting Agent even said they could void the deed once it's clear the tenant is paying the rent, which I foolishly believed). So there is a separate Deed to the tenancy agreement.

 

I gave the agent copies of my passport and pay slip proving sufficient funds, I didn't complete any application form.

 

One of my points is, I don't think the agent can sign the deed as the deed is between me and the landlord and they are very different to contracts etc. which someone else can sign??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to re-iterate that I am very happy to honour my 6 month commitment, I'm certainly not looking to weasel out of that. It's only beyond that point I want out, mainly because I am leaving the country and don't wish to be anchored with any 'obligations'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - understand - if you are out of the country and do not have a permanent address within the UK then you cannot be chased or held liable for any debt. You cannot be taken to court as you would not have a permanent residential address within the UK.

 

You MAY wish to you write to the agency informing them of your verbal agreement at the commencement of the tenancy that this guarantee was for six months only and you will not be held responsible for any extensions and suggest the tenant seeks another guarantor for the tenancy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly. I'm seriously not looking to shirk my 6 month commitment, I've been a landlord before and understand what potentially hard work it is. It's just I'm leaving the UK so I'm not sure how it can be enforced anyway??

 

I will write to the agent explaining this, I've already spoken to them and they're not really interested.

 

Back to one of my original points though. I agree that an agent can sign agreements on behalf of the landlord (e.g. the tenancy agreement) but I think, from my research, that a deed cannot be signed by anyone but the interested party.

 

A deed is quite a 'special' document...if I'm correct, this could be of interest to landlords who use deeds and have the agent sign them.

 

Have a read of Law of Property (Miscellanious Provisions) Act 1989 - unfortunately I can't post the exact link because this site won't allow me due to my low number of posts. It's worded in the normal legal language so not too easy to understand! For me anyway...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that in order for it to be a proper deeded guarantor agreement you need to have seen and signed and dated the tenancy agreement and the inventory, without these being seen and signed then your are not a deeded guarantor,

I am not a solicitor :!::!:

 

Most of my knowledge came from this site :-D:-D

 

If I have been helpful in any way at all .............. Please click my star..... :-(:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...