Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What can I do?


jimfishybob
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6401 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't want this to be long and complicated.

 

My mother has a mental illness, (easiest way to describe it is a mix of bipolarity and schizophrenia, usually she is normal but we have occasional 'episodes'), and I recently had to have her admitted to hospital as she lives with her 80 year old mother, (sprightly, but still 80), and the most recent episode, (including some self-harm), was frightening her.

 

She's been in three weeks and as far as i'm aware she's only seen a consultant once. I was present at this consultation and there was talk of sending her home even though she's not fully well. I couldn't really speak out against this at the time for risk of upsetting my Mum.

 

Consequently, Yesterday I rang the hospital and expressed concerns that they were contemplating discharging her into the care of my grandmother as I didn't feel she was equipped to cope with it. After a lengthy discussion, they agreed and assured me that, considering her domestic arrangements, it wasn't appropriate to discharge her yet.

 

Today, my Mum's regular Community Psychiatric Nurse has visited her in the hospital so I rang him after he'd been to see her to see how he'd got on. He said, although she's still not well she's better than she was when she was admitted, (which is true), The plan apparently is to discharge her on Friday into my grandmothers care, with occasional visits from the health service, despite everything i've said and everything i've been assured.

 

I now get the feeling that they were just telling me what I wanted to hear in order to shut me up. Is there anything I can do? Do I just have to stamp my feet loudly or do I just have to accept their decision?

 

Any advice greatly appreciated.

Smile:-The Ethical Bank:- Settled July 2006

HSBC:- Pre-lim sent 09/10/2006

LBA sent:-26/10/2006

Court papers issued:- 13/11/2006

Citifinancial/DLC:- Ongoing since 21st August. Now part of an OFT investigation into Debt Collection Practices.

I am only a Doctor of Love NOT Law. Don't blame me if me advice goes belly up!

:D (I will try to help all the same)

 

If i've helped, use the scales at the top to tell me how great I am!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello.

 

It all depends on your mother's current mental health state. Do you think that, if discharged, she poses a real and significant risk to herself or others because of her mental health?

 

If so, you (or your grandmother, depending on who has next of kin) would have to make an application for detention under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act. This would be detention for treatment and monitoring for a maximum of 28 days.

 

If you wanted to go ahead with this, you would need to contact a community legal centre or Social Services.

 

Don't forget, if there is an immediate and significant risk to her own/others after her discharge, call both the police and the ambulance service via 999. They have powers for immediate action under the MHA.

 

Davjoh

Here to help!

 

Good with employment, disability and welfare/benefit questions :rolleyes:

Just ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi There,

I agree you need to speak to social services, if your mum hasnt already been assigned a social worker then ask the hospital to do this for you, explain the implications of her going home with your nan and ask the hospital to make a note of this, you have expressly asked for your mum not to be sent back to your nan because you fear what might happen, this needs to be written into her notes incase of any come back, it will give the hospital something to think about.

 

My husband and I want through something ver similar last year, My father in law was addmitted to hospital 85 yrs old suffering with Alzheimers the poor man didnt know who we were, where he was, and become very abusive at times, they wanted to send him home to my 84 yr old mother in law, ridiculas, we fought hard and in the end his social worker found a lovely home for him, he ;lived there for 4 months before he sadley passed away.

 

I wish you the best of look, I hope all goes well for you all.

 

Brecken x

Link to post
Share on other sites

& had he injured his 84 yrs old wife they would have rung their hands & said "lessons have been learned & procedures changed"

 

The treatment of the elderly & infirm by many of the so called caring profession makes me sick & very very angry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks you all for your advice and words of support.

 

She was actually discharged a day earlier than they had led me to believe. All is going well at the moment and i'll keep you posted.

Smile:-The Ethical Bank:- Settled July 2006

HSBC:- Pre-lim sent 09/10/2006

LBA sent:-26/10/2006

Court papers issued:- 13/11/2006

Citifinancial/DLC:- Ongoing since 21st August. Now part of an OFT investigation into Debt Collection Practices.

I am only a Doctor of Love NOT Law. Don't blame me if me advice goes belly up!

:D (I will try to help all the same)

 

If i've helped, use the scales at the top to tell me how great I am!

Link to post
Share on other sites

& had he injured his 84 yrs old wife they would have rung their hands & said "lessons have been learned & procedures changed"

 

The treatment of the elderly & infirm by many of the so called caring profession makes me sick & very very angry

 

 

What makes it worse is that I work at my local hospital, I work with the elderly, and sometimes I honestly feel Im the only one who cares, I constantly feel Im banging my head against that ruddy wall, I had a lady stop me in the street a couple of weeks ago and ask " do you work at the hospital" when I said yes I do, she said I thought it was you, I just wanted to say thank you for caring for my mum while she was there, she told me it ment a lot.

I felt very proud of myself and relised I love my job, and I hope one day I come across other people who care.

I doesnt cost anything to be nice to each other does it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The treatment of the elderly & infirm by many of the so called caring profession makes me sick & very very angry

 

Hi there,

 

Just reading through this thread and just had to put my 2penneth in on behalf of the 'caring profession' (being one of them myself). Although there are many who work in the health field who just 'do the job', there are many more of us who do actually care! Unfortunately our hands are often tied due to limited resources and limited community care facilities. All of this is mostly due to the governments mishandling of the NHS.....they figure its better to increase the number of managers in order to reduce the NHS bill!!

 

I can understand how angry the mismanaged care of your relatives makes you feel, having had 2 elerly relatives end up with age related mental health problems myself! I'd actually advise asking to speak to the ward sister and discuss the possibility of holding a case study meeting.....this is where all those involved in the care of the 'patient' are allowed to have their say regarding the 'patient'. If this doesn't do the trick just move on up the ranks and express your concerns to everyone!

 

I hope it all works out for you and your families!

Karen x

Prelim request letter sent 19/10/06

Reply from complaints Dept received 01/11/06

GOGW received 11/11/06 for £210

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi karencupit

 

I agree there are some who care & your advice is well meant but as a person who has a professional interest in the well being of the elderly I have to say been there, done that had the paper hat many many times. Starts off great but then when its thought people have lost interest it falls back into a familar routine.

 

Also why should it be necessary to have meetings just to get the staff to look after their charges properly. Shouldn't it just be a matter of course they do it anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...