Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Are these the important pages I need to upload ? 1.  pages 1-4 are court form 10a 2.  2 pages of the CCA agreement  3.  Default notice from NewDay, 22/02/20 4.   Lowell letter stating they own debt ,     Dated 16/11/20 5. Unheaded letter also dated 16/11/20 from NewDay saying they assigned “all of the respective rights etc,”  to Lowell on 23/10/20 I make this 9 relevant pages from what I can see   ( all other pages are statements/default notes and lots of FCA info sheets) just needing your confirmation in advance as I don’t want to send over pages that are not required thank you  UCM      
    • Just out of curiosity aesmith - are you a lawyer?
    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver I could initiate a claim. Or much quicker  - the other entity - with a charge already - could use that to make an application for an order for sale.
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, so I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Being harrassed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4466 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Mrs H

 

You really need to speak to the court and request disclosure as above - post what you can of particulars of his part 20 so we can see what the issues are and how best to defend.

 

Have you spoken to the originating claimant [off the record] for their take on this at all?

 

Do you have copy of original 3rd party claim?

 

I can understand this is both frustrating and upsetting but you must set your feelings aside and focus on the lawfulness of his actions and best defence and/or counter.

 

In essence the numpty has been caught providing shoddy workmanship and tried passing the buck to you with hyperinflated claim for works done...

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was no court forms issued regards the part 20 claim, rather he said in court he wanted to sue for the sum for work done and not paid for. I was with the original claimant in court for the original hearing and he shifted the blame to me, saying I directed the work and told him to do it all. The judge said well we will have to add her name to the claim now, and that was it, I was a defendant. The original claimant is one of my best friends and feels guilty I have been brought into this for trying to help her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

That's a bit muddled, do you want to sleep on this and come back to this tomorrow when you're a little more settled....

 

There was no court forms issued regards the part 20 claim, rather he said in court he wanted to sue for the sum for work done and not paid for. I was with the original claimant in court for the original hearing and he shifted the blame to me, saying I directed the work and told him to do it all....... Work for claimant or for you?

 

The judge said well we will have to add her name to the claim now, and that was it, I was a defendant....... somethings missing, at which point did you become a defendant in a joining at part 20?

 

The original claimant is one of my best friends and feels guilty I have been brought into this for trying to help her.... Have you ever instructed/authorised works on behalf of your friend?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Believe me I dont sleep about worrying about this.

 

I was in court with the claimant for the first case management hearing. The defendant said he took the items for payment for work he done and wasnt paid for and that he was countersuing the claimant for non payment of work completed. He told the judge I instructed him (the defendant) to do the work. The judge then said, well we best add her to the claim. I then became a part 20 defendant, without having been issued with any of the papers you listed above. Does that help clear it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and yes I was instructing and paying for the work on the house as I owned 50% of it at the time. But he has not done the work he has claimed to have done. He even said to the court he cut a tree down in the gardern and took it to the skip, which he charged nearly three thousand pounds for. HOWEVER, the neighbour has came forward and advised me that she asked for the tree to be cut down as it was a security risk to her property and that SHE AND HER HUSBAND had cut it down and her son burned it in their wood burner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was no court forms issued regards the part 20 claim, rather he said in court he wanted to sue for the sum for work done and not paid for. I was with the original claimant in court for the original hearing and he shifted the blame to me, saying I directed the work and told him to do it all....... Work for claimant or for you? = Work was for the claimant directed and paid by me.

 

The judge said well we will have to add her name to the claim now, and that was it, I was a defendant....... somethings missing, at which point did you become a defendant in a joining at part 20? - At the case management hearing. He sent in a counterclaim against the claimant, but at the case management hearing the judge added my name to his counterclaim as I instructed him - no papers or anything sent to me. Incidently it took my friend over a year to track him down to sue him for the costs of the goods missing and it was only when he sent in his defence that he said he wanted paid for work done, there was never any mention of this before, only when he sent his defense to the court

 

The original claimant is one of my best friends and feels guilty I have been brought into this for trying to help her.... Have you ever instructed/authorised works on behalf of your friend? Yes and paid for everything instructed/for all materials purchased and I have abided by all agreements made

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right......... it pays to provide as much info as possible on here from the first post onwards as it can/does impact on the advice offered

 

if you can post back on here tomorrow, we'll need to know the following [apologies if you've already posted this info]; 1 & 2 I'm assuming you'll have easy access to:

 

1. Particulars of claim

 

2. Defence

 

3. Number of reliable witnesses in support of 1 [above]

 

4. Any verifiable quotations for works done

 

5. Any verifiable quotations for works not done

 

6. Current orders/directions

 

7. Date of hearing [if any]

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I give such paticulars on here, surely that would effect my claim.

 

 

You can post pretty much whatever you want if its lawful and the source is reported verbatim [word for word], remember to remove any/all identifiers...... name, address, claim number etc

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Would like to thank everyone who gave me advise, the claim against me was thrown out of court today, thank you all

 

Good er, early morning Mrs H

 

£48,000.00 Counterclaim struk out, Godzilla to that!

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good er, early morning Mrs H

 

£48,000.00 Counterclaim struk out, Godzilla to that!

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

 

Slight error, £19,000.00 Counterclaim struck out, sooooo, I still say Godzilla to that, a great result for Mrs H.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...