Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • a 'witness' to it not arriving till the 15th is sadly immaterial too. regardless to the above anyway, the PCN remains valid. 
    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

And I thought we'd been getting on so well?! (Cap 1 / Capquest)


sirpip
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4492 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I know many of you have had bad experiences with Capital One, but of all my 'friends' in the debt industry, they've been the ones I have found most reasonable, until now..

 

 

I'll keep it brief - any advice would be most welcome..

  • Mid 2008 - Default with Capital One £1700.
  • Agreed a payment plan of £20pm, default was still issued but account retained by OC
  • Paid for over 3 years (40 consecutive payments), balance now £900.
  • Today, letter from Capquest, basically saying "We're in charge now, show us the money".

Why offload the account to a DCA now, after all this time?

Why no warning?

Why no letter of assignment?

 

I suppose I could contact Capquest and simply reinstate the £20pm arrangement, but I'm not sure.

 

What do you lot think? :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

I know many of you have had bad experiences with Capital One, but of all my 'friends' in the debt industry, they've been the ones I have found most reasonable, until now..

 

 

I'll keep it brief - any advice would be most welcome..

  • Mid 2008 - Default with Capital One £1700.
  • Agreed a payment plan of £20pm, default was still issued but account retained by OC
  • Paid for over 3 years (40 consecutive payments), balance now £900.
  • Today, letter from Capquest, basically saying "We're in charge now, show us the money".

Why offload the account to a DCA now, after all this time?

Why no warning?

Why no letter of assignment?

 

I suppose I could contact Capquest and simply reinstate the £20pm arrangement, but I'm not sure.

 

What do you lot think? :???:

 

Hi, does the letter say Capquest have bought the debt and

that they now are the creditor, or are Capquest say they have

been assigned to collect and manage the account for Cap 1 ??

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, does the letter say Capquest have bought the debt and

that they now are the creditor, or are Capquest say they have

been assigned to collect and manage the account for Cap 1 ??

 

Hi

 

'This correspondence is to inform you that your Capital One account has been referred to CapQuest Debt recovery Limited to manage your account in all matters relating to collection..' Plus the usual threats of doorstep visits, litigation, HL Legal etc.

 

Although, in a friendly and understanding way, the letter does finish with the words "Let's work on this together". They sound like really nice guys :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical nonsense, the explanation is that it is

probably cheaper for Cap 1 to farm the ''non''

productive accounts for collection rather than

keep it inhouse.

Are you paying Cap 1 by SO or DD at present.?

BTW the letter is an acceptable notice of assignment.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would personally just keep that going and ignore Capquest,

if they play up send a CCA request, you are in control this way.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, keep the payments going to cap1 then if they claim to have passed this to cr@pquest, you can reduce your offer of payment to £1 a month, see how they like those apples!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, keep the payments going to cap1 then if they claim to have passed this to cr@pquest, you can reduce your offer of payment to £1 a month, see how they like those apples!

Sound as a bell as usual Boo:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd sar crap1 and get reclaiming

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd sar crap1 and get reclaiming

 

dx

 

 

Cheers DX, I like your style.

 

I have never taken ppi on any loan or credit card, always saw it as rip-off. So my potential for reclaim is minimal sadly. I also operated all my accounts like a good boy until 2007, so even late payment charges wouldn't figure hugely (perhaps half a dozen from 1999-2007).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

'This correspondence is to inform you that your Capital One account has been referred to CapQuest Debt recovery Limited to manage your account in all matters relating to collection..' Plus the usual threats of doorstep visits, litigation, HL Legal etc.

 

Although, in a friendly and understanding way, the letter does finish with the words "Let's work on this together". They sound like really nice guys :-)

 

This doesnt sound like an assignment to me ? But you could send the following letter to obtain confirmation of their status.. If it hasnt been assigned then they are breaching OFT guidelines by threatening you with legal action that they themselves cannot take !!

 

[ATTACH]32452[/ATTACH]

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CB it's CAP 1s version contains all the info,

stating that Crapquest are ''managing'' the

conduct and collection of the account, although

with recent experience I would not be surprised

if a ''sale'' follows.

There are a large number of these around at present.

I guess there will be a lot more.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sirpip,

 

Well, do not rule out anything. With Capquest anything possible.

Just as Brig said, according to what they have been doing lately, they start by claiming that they have been assigned to manage and collect.

That might be far from the truth though but time will tell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I don't like here is that you have have apparently agreed a repayment scheme and you have stuck to it over the years.

It seems that they are now reneging on the agreement by selling the debt on to a DCA which wants to change the terms.

 

Unless there wqas something in the agreement which allows the repayments to be reviewed, I owuld say that what they are doing is unlawful and can be challenged.

 

I'm not saying that the sale of the debt is unlawful. That is probably permitted. However the sale of the debt has to be accompanied by any agreements which are currently in place for the repayment.

 

Do you have any written record of the original £20pcm agreement?

Could we see it please.

 

To my mind, CQ are estopped from going back on the promise given by Cap1.

Furthermore, there might be scope to argue that their attempt to renege show bad faith domination and therefore am unfair relationship per s.140A CCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your comments BF, but as for your question:

 

... Do you have any written record of the original £20pcm agreement?

Could we see it please.

 

No, I don't think I do, it was all agreed over the phone a long while ago. What I can show (via bank statements), is a 3+ years run of me keeping to my side of the bargain and them happily accepting the money. The only dissent they have shown was a letter several months ago regarding a missed payment, I called them regarding this and the problem was resolved (the payment wasn't missed but simply a week late due to a change of bank accounts, in fact they had received the payment by the time I had got their letter).

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. I expect that the evidence of 3 years of payments will do. The blip will have been covered by a resumption in payments and their acceptance of them. However, I expect that they will raise the blip as an excuse.

 

You should check you r credit file to see if the default has been renewed. Keep monitoring it.

 

I would also SAR CAP1 to see what they have got. You want everything - correspondence, screen notes, post-its - everything.

 

Because you are not protected by BCOBS here you will probably have to remain passive and see what CQ will do. If they sue you then I would suggest defending with an estoppel and then also raising s.140A CCA on the basis that anyone who breaks their promise is clearly demonstrating bad faith and an unfair relationship.

 

If you wanted, I suppose that you could sue on s.140A - although this is far more difficult.

 

Keep on making the payments - and frankly, hope that they will try and sue you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA request to Capquest by rec. delivery. They will/should then hand the account back to Cap1 and you can resume payments..... depending on the paperwork they produce. The ball is then firmly back in your court.

 

The usual reply from the original creditor in this case cap 1. will be to ask for your signature.

I have 2 accounts that have been returned to crap 1 after crap quest tried to tell me that crap 1 have a right to ask for my sig . I told them that I have been making payments to them for over 2 years.

And they were also happy to send letters to me at this address.

If they were now in doubt about my identity then they should not be chasing the debt.

Both Crap ONE and Crap Quest have now crawled back under there stones for now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks P1 and BF,

 

Although it makes no difference to the currrent position with the account, I have just thought of a reason why Cap1 might have wanted to to offload the debt....

 

I was made redundant in October - phoned Cap1 to tell them that although I would do my utmost to keep to the arrangement, there was obviously the potential for a problem unless I got back into work pronto.

 

The guy I spoke to said it was sensible to let them know, rather than wait until I had a problem paying. He said that they would consider a lower monthly payment and would send out an income and expenditure form. Told him I would fill the form in if it became necessary, until then I would continue the £20pm payment. A couple of days later I got the form.

 

Quite possibly an 'account manager' reviewed my account and thought that I represented a greater risk than previously, hence the sale to Capquest? The point is though (isn't it?) that I paid up in November and again in December.. it's not as though I completed the I&E form suggesting a reduction to £1pm.

 

Doesn't this episode help my cause somewhat (morally at least, in the event of a legal action)?....

 

I pay what was agreed, and I do so for over 3 years. I advise of a change in circumstances, not to request a reduction in payment, but simply to advise that a problem could crop up, since when, I pay up as before. Then, for reasons of expediency, my debt is sold to a DCA. Is that fair your honour?

Edited by sirpip
typos
Link to post
Share on other sites

quite honestly i'd put 'em down to £1PCM

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...