Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Faulty Speakers Now Discontinued (Logitech/Ebuyer)


swiftkidd
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4492 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I purchased a pair of Logitech Z 10 speakers from ebuyer March 2010. They are now faulty under a 2 year warranty. My problem is the products since been discontinued so I'm unable to get replacements. I've had to deal direct with Logitech as Ebuyers automated form automatically cuts off and says contact Logitech about faults & repairs.

 

So for the last three week's I've been emailing back & forth to Logitech's support. They agreed to a warranty 'exchange' no problem except they no longer have any in their warehouse due to recently discontinuing the product. This isn't really relevant but at the time play.com had them in stock. Logitech wanted me to print out a return label and arrange an UPS pickup to ship them out to the Netherlands before they process my refund.

 

During that time the speakers at play.com have sold out. I can't find them any where due to they've been discontinued so I no longer wish to ship them back as I really don't like any other speakers so a £50 refund isn't of great help to me but what's more I emailed the trader at play who claims he sourced the speakers from an agent who specializes in Logitech clearance stock from the Netherlands. So in essence Logitech has sold my warranty/guarantee speakers to play.com.

 

I requested Logitech locate Z 10's to which they claim they are unable to track global stocks so I requested a repair to which they said they do not have a repair service so I've requested a full refund to enable me to get them repaired myself which they've denied me claiming they need the product back in order to refund me.

 

I requested that guy's superior to which he side-stepped & ignored & basically said:

 

There are 2 options that we can offer you but nothing else. Please review them in the following.

 

1- We replace your Z-10 with a different Logtech Speaker System (see the available systems from at a same price range. Please note; you will have to send your product back to us through a local post office which is free of charge.

 

2- We offer full money refund for your Z-10 speakers. Please note; we will have to arrange a free of charge pick up for your Z-10, then when we receive your product we will issue the money refund.

 

If any of those above are is not suitable for you then there is nothing we can do from here. In this case please contact to our Head Quarters.

 

Head Quarters are based in Switzerland. I'm residing in the UK. so I see no way of contacting HQ other than writing to them, I've requested email but he says they don't have email.

 

"I am sorry but there is no anyother way to contact and made a complain to Logitech Headquarters than sending a written document through post."

 

So what are my options am I really left with the above two. I told the guy to get Logitech HQ to email me or call me but he's really not taking much notice. Just a bunch of useless pleasantries & formality

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your contract is with Ebuyer not logitech or play. com

The Sale of goods act is your best friend here.

 

--------------------------------

That's true, but I'm still entitled to take it up direct with the manufacturer. I've cut out the middle man but Ebuyer refers me to Logitech as stated when I started to fill out the return claim it cut the form off when selecting return due to faulty from drop down menu.

 

It said for faults contact Logitech direct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update: Option 3 has come into place

 

Thanks for your response. If you accept our Loyalty discount code as explained below, you will not need to send your faulty Z-10 speakers back to us, however, Z-10 will be out of warranty anymore and you will not be able to claim for a warranty exchange for Z-10 in the future.

 

We can offer you loyalty discount Logitech understands the situation in which you have been placed.

Logitech values you as a loyal customer and as a gesture of goodwill I can provide you with a Loyalty Discount code. The Loyalty Discount code will allow you to place one order on the Logitech.com online store with a discount of 50%.

 

Please note that some conditions apply, as the Loyalty Discount code:

- Can only be used for one purchase and for one similar product.

- Is only valid for 30 days.

- Does not include a discount on shipping costs.

 

Would you be interested in receiving a Loyalty Discount code?

 

And other 2 options are still valid as summarized below;

 

1- We replace your Z-10 with a different Logtech Speaker System (see the available systems from at a same price range. Please note; you will have to send your product back to us through a local post office which is free of charge.

 

2- We offer full money refund for your Z-10 speakers. Please note; we will have to arrange a free of charge pick up for your Z-10, then when we receive your product we will issue the money refund.

 

I am waiting for your valuable reply.

My reply:

Hm, I don't think Logitech quiet understands my situation or appreciates my  loyalty. I did further research into speaker repairs & in order to repair my  Logitech speakers it's in all likely hood that I would require a replacement  part which of course can only be provided by Logitech. Which repair &  replacement parts has already been ruled out as an option so Z 10's are no good  to me anymore.

50% discount I'm assuming this is excluding the £52.88  refund for the Z 10 speakers. I want the Z906's which is priced at £299.00 in  Logitech's store but can be found for £230 on Ebay as noted before Logitech  store does not compete with it's customers (Buyers)/Traders/Resellers  etc.

So I will pay £100 for Z906's, Return the Z 10 speakers &  forfeit the refund. Which would make it a true 50% discount. 

Do you think this is a good deal ? I send the speakers back, pay £100 & get 50% of Z906 (5.1 speaker setup) though tbh I don't really want a 5.1 & Logitech products look like they're made from cheap toy plastics..

 

They are trying to rip me of by claiming I can have 50% off without my refund. my refund is worth £52.88 & Logitech stores overinflated price on average 20-25% more expensive then their online retailers..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update & resolved:

 

Sent a couple more email's to Logitech & received a phone call the next morning from their headquarters in Switzerland I told Logitech how thing's where going to go down.

 

My deal: I've returned my Z-10's in exchange for a full refund (£52.88). Received a 50% off in-store discount code and used it to purchase "Logitech Speaker System Z906 & Bluetooth Wireless Adapter priced £299.00.

So paid £149.50. Not quiet my 50% off (Product Price) so also requested & received. Logitech Ultimate Ears 200Vi priced £34.99 so roughly works out my 50%. Which I'm kinda happy with as I got a double victory as you'll see in my next thread " Mis-sold & now faulty"

 

Edit: the only thing I forgot to do was use 'Topcashback' to receive a 5.5% cashback of £7.50 :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...