Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please answer the following questions.   1 Date of the infringement 03rd March 2024   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] I did not received a NTK    [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received Give answer here   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Give answer here   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Give answer here   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Give answer here   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here   7 Who is the parking company? MET Parking Services   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] (346) Southgate Park, Stansted CM24 1PY   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS - POPLA   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here I received a parking charge Final Reminder today 15th April 2024  Copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions... …….... In either case scan up bothsides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY MET Parking Services Scanned Doc.pdf
    • I am getting conflicting advice from friends about this issue. I am hoping somebody can end my confusion. A couple of weeks ago I took my Mum out for her birthday. Another driver scratched the front passenger side near the bumper of my car as it was parked up. There are no dents just quite severe paint work damage. He scraped his car against mine. The other driver drove off. Luckily there was 2 witnesses who got the other drivers reg number. Cut a log story short the other driver said he didn’t realise he damaged the paintwork on my car. He has however admitted liability. His insurance is paying out. Last Thursday my car was taken away to have the paintwork done. Today I been told my car has been put down as a total loss (not a write off).  As it is only paintwork damage and not body work or mechanical damage, I don't understand why it has been put down as a total loss. I have been told by the insurers I can either write the car off and receive payment to the value of the car or I can take a lower payment and get the car repaired myself.   I am getting conflicting advice from friends. Some are saying if I keep my car and get the repairs done myself the car will then be classed as a category S or category M and I will no longer be able get insurance on the car as it will be classed as written off. As it is only paintwork damage and not body work or mechanical damage, I don't understand that. My questions are  If I take the payment to get the paintwork repair done myself will I still be able to insure my car when the insurance is up for renewal? If I take the payment to get the paintwork repair done myself will my current insurance policy be voided? If my car does get classed as category M or S will the stop me from selling it on the future? Thanks
    • Yes, it is just for Tesco. But as that manager explained, those two spaces on that ground are now rented by the electric company. "What appeal?  Private parking companies never, ever, ever accept appeals - ever." What is my next move then, please? Just wait for them to issue me with whatever it is they issue, and then what? 
    • so how are you doing OP?  Letter of claim ready?
    • @fusionrox please create your own thread by clicking the button at the top of the website
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

have I been fed a load of lies by south eastern water


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4501 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

last year when I was having great financial difficulties I informed se water who refused point blank to come to an arrangement.

Finally this year we broke even and had funds to get out of debt. agin se water refused installments.

 

We moved and informed them of this then heard absolutly nothing .

 

Then last week a letter dropped on my doormat with the final bill dated 3rd november stating that it was subject to court proceedings.

then just 2 days later when I was out a male came rounnd (I was out at the time) and my son answered where this thing (to pout it mildly)

demanded him to call me on the phone.

 

He made all sorts of threats saying that if I didn,t come to his beck and call he was going to add extra fees on.

THIS GUY WAS NOT A BAILIFF.

 

I asked to be put back to my son and he hung up on me and my son said he left.

 

This morning he returned and I was here by myself as my hubby to be was out and I spoke to him through the open window

this poerson was truly revolting firsr he literally grabbed my arm and thrust paperwork in my hand and when i read it told him that I had never received any court papers here

or old address and that I was getting married on the date to which he replied

"well you will have to cancel the wedding and go to jail then "

 

I immediatly called se water and told them and they said he was not a bailiff def and had overstepped the mark .

 

I also told them again that I was willing to pay installements and that I could not attend the hearing as I was getting married

to which she replied no we want all the money in one hit refused point black to revoke the means test ,

refused to acknowlege we never received any claim forms and even said we never ever rang them .

 

she was adamant that she would rather me face the courts than come to an amicable result.

 

My Partner called them agsin as I was distraught and tried once again but was met with brickwalls where ever he turned.

 

In the finish we mustered up the full whack and soon as we did this miraculasly the summons was relinquished leaving us with a cancelled wedding reception and honeymoon .

 

grst and I get married in 3 weeks>

 

Does someone know whether they still could have accepted installments or have they diddled me into parting with my wedding cash and leaving us high and dry

Link to post
Share on other sites

water is NOT a priority bill like gas & electric

 

they cant cut you off

 

i very much doubt the guy was a bailiff

and

i doubt they even had any court papers

 

they lied.

 

for ref

have you checked your CRA file?

 

as for not accepting installments

 

for futher ref

 

thats THEIR rule.

they cant stop you.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no the guy was def not a bailiff se water admitted ton that and I have put a complaint in about him, the paperwork he gave me was to attend court for questioning and basically to cough up in full or i will go to jail. this guy was employed by se water they admitted to it . I kniow from often reading on here that water is not a priority debt and cannot be sent to prison but it seems they have found a legal loophole (or loogal leaphole as called by my beloved LOL) where as they called me for the questioning and if I dont shiw I would be done for contempt and jailed LOvely. I did call the courts also and asked for the set aside due to the fact thsat I had never received court forms or had a chance to defend myself. but as I said mustered the last of the cash to cear the debt which was due to be paid for the wedding etc. So these people basically have done me over then by going behind my back getting a judgment by default using legal loopholes and john boast lookalikes \(was scarey cos he was a spit of him but obviously not) is there a way of getting the monies back and going onto instasllments instesd or do I have to write this off as a bad experience and just do my i do,s and send all my guests home

Link to post
Share on other sites

so do you know what court it was filed at?

you could [if you paid by card]

poss use chargeback

 

i had the same arguement with

3 valleys

aND

latterly viola

 

i was at my property almost 20yrs

 

the water till 2007 was in with the ctax

then it split out

i successfully argued that the ctax was installments so my water will be

and paid 1/12th each month by internet banking

water co changed

had the same with viola [even though new name for 3V]

 

paid them 1/12th each month

got loads of threat-ograms but never a court order

 

so di you actually get one then

 

dx

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well lets put it this way I didn't know until I received my final bill at my new address that they had put a claim in by croydon county court and transferred it to kettering as I live in the northants area now but I did nit know this until I read my final bill stating subject to court and that idiotic moron who thrust the questioning hearing at me whilst telling me I am not allowed to get married. but it seems to me that they served papers at the old address despite me telling them i had moved. n when I confronted se water with this they cslled me a liar and told me I never informed them and they traced me through electoral role (odd im not on there yet) and magically all my telecons I had last year with them had vanished. and they got it by default and yup you guesed it northampton county court, who transferred it to croydon who transferred it to kettering . I did ask about the chargeback but the bank says that as I willingly paid this nothing they can do about it

Link to post
Share on other sites

willingly paid, but under duress

 

now another angle

 

you weren't send the papers

 

get the [ccj?] set aside.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you were not served the papers - yes.

 

but how long it will take is another matter

and yu'll prob not get your money back till you've won the set aside.

 

pers i think you need to investigate the chargeback again.

 

you need to tell the bank that you willingly paid

because you got a court order

however, you now know the order was obtained by fowl means

and the court are sending you papers to get it set aside.

 

even if this 'compounds' the set aside issue

i'm sure no judge would bear a grudge as a pre planned wedding was involved!

 

i have never found any law which states you must pay your water bill upfront in full.

 

certainly by installments, so's you are never in arrears , but none that says you MUST pay it all on the first bill date which is a full 1yrs in advance!

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...