Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help - Baliff called today and fine paid... Can I do anything about it?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4547 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok.... Unfortunately a not very lovely bloke from Marstons Bailiffs called today, intimidated me and my girlfriend and left with the fine fully paid £587.90

 

This is my full story: (it is copy and pasted from a draft letter to the courts)

 

Unfortunately, the first I heard of this fine was over a year ago when a letter was given to me from another (wrong) address.

 

I spoke to the lady at Cambridge Court and she advised me that I write to the courts asking for details of the fine and all the paperwork.

 

I sent the letter asking for all the above paperwork in August 2010 but never heard anything back.

 

In all honesty, I probably forgot about it and that is why I didn’t chase it,

At the time I had been unemployed for three months due to being made redundant and I was in the middle of starting a new job

and moving home so I am not overly positive that the court didn’t reply but I just never received it.

 

Fast forward the best part of fifteen months,

and you’ll arrive at the problem I received today.

 

My girlfriend arrived home from work and was followed to the door by a Gentleman, who turned out to be your Bailiff.

 

He told me that I had to pay a £587 fine today otherwise he would enter my house and take things to that value.

When I told him that it was a joint rented house with my friend and that probably eighty percent of the items in the house are not mine,

he said that was not his problem,

he was just instructed to remove items to clear the debt.

 

My girlfriend, hearing this and fearing for our friends belongings, paid the full amount of the fine, £587.90 on her debit card.

 

Leaving her practically penny less for Christmas.

 

When I told the bailiff that I had not had a letter regarding this matter for well over a year he produced a form showing every time a letter was ‘sent’ or a phone call was ‘made’.

 

None of those ever made it to me, and I would be surprised if the phone calls were ever answered as nobody from a court has ever contacted me.

 

Furthermore, after reading on the internet and in several Legal forums,

it was widely written that bailiff’s should give 7 to 14 days written notice before they attend your property, which never happened.

 

I also enclose a copy of the distress warrant as the warrant address is 49 G St, whereas my residential address is 53 G St.

 

 

My questions are, is there anything I can do to get the money back (even some of it!)

 

I have spent near on two hours trawling the internet looking for information,

and have found a Template of Statuatory Declaration,

but dont know if this is valid as I did read the letter and phone the court over a year ago,

even though they didnt reply to my letter that I know of!

 

Any help would be great! :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Fleeced by the balliff ! Visa Debit Card = Chargeback through the bank.... "I ONLY AUTHORISED 58.79 NOT 587.90"! - BE INSISTANT WITH THE BANK DO IT TODAY, BE AT A LOSS TO WHY SUCH AN AMOUNT WAS TAKEN WHEN YOU / THE GF WAS TOLD IT WOULD ONLY BE DOUBLE FIGURES :-)

 

This will upset the baliff firm...which is an understatement......

 

Meanwhile, before he comes a knocking again like a bad santa claus, get onto the court, get a stat dec filed before xmas SMARTLY.

 

Other more learned in such like will be along with the words you will need :-)

 

Numbers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nick,

 

She'll have to sort with the bank BUT by going down this route, i am sure you will understand that when / if the bank refund this amount...

the fine will be outstanding, further action will need to be taken to remove the fine and extorted balliff charges and the balliffs (or scrouge as i like to call

them at this time of year) will be mighty p***ed off and will be spiting fire...

 

I deal with CB's on a daily basis, from the point of challenging them....

 

There was a change this year, whereas the amounts are refunded immediately to the payee, and then it is upto the company to prove that the charges were true and correct, which if accepted are

re-debited. Even then, the charges can be challenged a 2nd time, and after that it would goto abitration... we would not proceed at this point, as the visa scheme for example will charge the company 750 usd as a minimum for proceeding, win or lose.

 

Usually methods of proving a valid charge are signed authority / confirmation letters etc / PIN entry on PDQ machine. I'm sure the balliff did not carry a pdq machine with him / her, unless of course the card was inserted in his a**e! Did he ring the number thru to his office ?????

 

YOU MUST DEAL WITH THE SOURCE OF THE CHARGES TODAY / MONDAY AT THE LATEST.....ELSE IT WILL GET WORSE...

 

My advice only deals with getting the money back of the 3rd party who paid it for you.....which shouldnt have happened as it was not her debt!!

 

Good Luck to you....

 

 

EDIT - MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL OUR GUESTS ..... 14 at mo! Must be a quiet day....

 

Numbers

Edited by numbers666
Sarcastic Comment
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Numbers

 

I have drafted a Statuatory Declaration but have not got it signed yet as im not overly sure that I can seen as officially I did know about it when I was handed the letter in August 2010.

 

I'll wait till the pro's reply... hopefully! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

Ok Typical timescales for chargebacks....

 

You contact your bank, they refund the money approx 2 - 4 days depending on bank.....

 

They will in this period notify the merchant ie pdq processing agent such as elavon / lloyds / barclays etc of the chargeback... and ask them to provide evidence that this is true and proper charge.

 

THEY will write to the company, the balliffs asking for such... 3 days after they write, the money will be debited from the bank account of the balliffs and sent to your bank...

..............your bank has already refunded you by this point....................

 

so...

 

its possible that the balliff company will not see this chargeback until this coming friday at the earliest....probably even between xmas and newyear more likely....get the SD done on monday, signed by a notary, send one copy to the balliffs and the other to the court - retain one incase they turn up in january....

 

I'd imagine the balliffs will be worshipping the devil or summit like that over xmas with their families, sharpening their teeth and too busy to bother coming out in the snow....

 

As long as you have a SD done, if they do show up, show it too them, it should be like garlic to a vampire, they will hiss and splutter and sulk off to whence they came.....

 

C

Link to post
Share on other sites

Err - No - I banked with YB and had the same card - kick off a storm!

 

How are my debit card purchases protected?

 

 

You have some protection for purchases made using Visa, Visa Electron and Maestro debit cards, through something called Chargeback.

 

The scheme makes it possible for you to claim a refund if a purchase made using your debit card is unsatisfactory, if you are billed multiple times, if you don't receive goods you've paid for, or if your card is used fraudulently.

 

You can claim a refund for any amount of money so it can also be invoked if you have problems with a credit card purchase over £30,000 or under £100 in value.

 

If you want to make a claim, you’ll have to contact the bank who provided you with the card within 120 days of when your goods should have been delivered.

 

If the goods are faulty or your card was used fraudulentyl, contact your bank within 120 days of when you are first made aware of this.

 

Ask them to initiate the Chargeback process and a dispute will be opened by your bank, who will investigate the matter and refund your money when this is settled.

 

It’s worth noting however that while credit card providers are under a legal obligation to refund you because of the Consumer Credit Act, debit card providers are not legally required to honour your refund request. Therefore a little more persistence may be needed when claiming a refund for your debit card transaction.

http://www.theukcardsassociation.org.uk/files/ukca/section_75_v3.pdf

 

But you will be issuing a SD also, this will also reset the fees....but hell and high water getting them back off the balliff

 

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the fees are not refunded after a stat dec you could use the small claims track ,and if they don't defend, and don't pay, send a bailiff to collect off the bailiff....

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the fees are not refunded after a stat dec you could use the small claims track ,and if they don't defend, and don't pay, send a bailiff to collect off the bailiff....

 

Don't forget to issue the N1 to the PREVIOUS company address and then transfer up for a writ of fifa to the High Court to collect 751.49.... :-) or file a winding up order a method of debt collection (sic)

 

Kidding of course, this has Never happened (picks self up off floor)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...