Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you click on the letters SAR which should be underlined and in blue, that's your link with the information.   HB
    • I have my phone ,car key and wallet all in the same place, i left them  behind the bar and go to the bathroom. When I come back I realise my phone has disappear (the bar has been empty no customers) so I did go to the office and ask the managers if they took my phone, to know is it in they hands or someone steal my phone. All of them they said no (they are three) and one of them she said this will be a lesson for me to don't come with my phone. I do understand and i ask them if they can have a look on the cctv and they refuse. So I go back to the bar and i ring my phone three times,  the last time when i try to ring the phone has been switch it off. I report this incident to the police. And the next day I call them to see if they have my phone, the answer it was no. After few days I receive an email from HR to let me know she has my phone. So the GM sneak into the bar and took my  phone without letting me know,  and then he said he found my phone and after he said he is allowed to confiscate my phone!
    • Hi there.   This sounds like an absolute trainwreck in slow motion.  As far as I know there's no such thing as an automatic right in law for the mother to be able to live where her children currently reside.  Plus I'm not sure why the police would force you to let her back in as surely this would be a civil matter rather than a criminal one, unless they were just "keeping the peace".  It'd be interesting to see that letter she produced if you still have it.    What's your current living situation?  If you're renting and if it's just your name on the rental agreement then she's got no right to be there, however if she's lived there since 2017 she may now have some resident's rights.   If you own your current house and you bought it while you were still married she may have a claim to a share of it as a marital asset, even if it's just your own name on the mortgage.    I'd say you really need to speak to a divorce solicitor ASAP.
    • Hi all, I'm a member of the public defending a case by CCPlus T/a GroupNexus  for 4 PCNs from back in 2014 and 2015. The main part of my defence is that I was working on site, and Roadchef didnt enter my VRN either correctly or at all. I had repeatedly called them and was told that they would be voided. I heard nothing for years and therefore thought it was all settled. Another part of my defence will be to question the possible deliberate ploy or policy to wait until 5 years has passed to pursue these claims, therefore claiming an extra 8% per annum in  interest on each ticket. I went to mediation today and we didnt agree  on a settlement, so this will continue on to court. I asked for an SAR (Subject Access Request) for all 4 PCNS and they only sent me details for one of them so i offered to pay for one of them minus the fees/charges etc which was rejected. For the record, 4 PCNs now stand at £950 plus court and solicitor fees.   What also irked me is that I had an email  response from a director at Roadchef saying that they could have helped if i had gone to them earlier. I had gone to them earlier, and presumed it was settled. then years later CP Plus pop up with a letter of claim and summons. This left me in a catch22 situation  and is why I think that this is a deliberate ploy. They leave it 5 years to pursue the claim, then the landowner cant help you because it's 5 years down the line   That aside, I would like to hear from other people who have been targeting 4 or 5 years down the line and would ask if I can use their cases in my defence. If we can prove that this is deliberate, we can do something about it. I would also like to hear from a solicitor who'd like to take this up on my behalf.  Thanks
    • This post is regarding PPE listings on all the major buying platforms. and is affecting many thousands of people trying to buy PPE items.
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 12 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
gumbodave

Hanson v Cahoot - 6QZ18789

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 5141 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

After getting all details of charges and being refused a refund of them I issued a claim form againstCahoot for £833.59.

 

They have entered an acknowledgement of service, meaning they have 28 days in which to file a defence... that was on 31st march, so just waiting for them now. I suppose one of them is bound to turn up to court eventually, but publicity would be good to draw attention to the issue... unles I lost of course!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

good luck with this. have you pm'd the details to one of the mods to put it on the litigation in process thread?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it's done. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for the support!

I am slightly worried these dudes might take it to the courts, but if they do I will make sure it gets publicity. I work for the Consumer Credit Counselling Service, a charity that tries to help indebted consumers, and on a daily basis I see the sly ploys banks and credit companies use to impoverish people who are already in financial trouble. It's really quite disturbing. The OFT haven't seemed to act to stop unfair practices regarding mis-selling of loans and credit cards, or to stop creditors harrassing consumers, so I wouldn't hold my breath in them getting to grips with the charges any time soon...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question:

 

With Cahoot having 28 days to file a defence, do have to advise me of their defence, or would I only find out the details of that at a hearing?

 

In one of the responses from them earlier in the dispute, their customer relations fellow told me, in writing, he thought the charges were proportionate, so hopefully that will be their (flawed) defence.

 

Any advice welcome...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a read of the CPR in the Library. Yes, you will get a copy of the defence in advance of a hearing. The fact that they file a defence is not a definate indication that there will be a hearing. It is quite possible that they will make a settlement offer after filing a defence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers.

 

Yeah I reckon after the OFT's press release they may well make an offer based around that £12 per charge figure. We'll see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also thinking of filing aganist Cahoot for charges made on a current account and credit card I had with them in the past, which is now closed.

 

Do you know where I can find the OFT's press release? I knew they stated that £12 was 'fair' but my link has now expired on the BBC website and comes up with a customer that sued his bank for around £800 in Manchester. Is there an official site?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive just found the actual press release on the OFT website

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/News/Press+releases/2006/68-06.htm

 

There is also advice for consumers: http://www.oft.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/DF19FDA9-1D31-4B18-B251-9BF5AF6A29D4/0/oft842a.pdf


Click links below to view threads:

 

Halifax £763 REFUNDED

Halifax Visa £125 REFUNDED

Amex Blue Card - £323 REFUNDED

HSBC - OFFER ACCEPTED & REFUNDED

Littlewoods - Removal of Default Notice - REFUSED

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Found it now. This is being discussed in the general forums under the OFT ruling and is 'Sticky'.

 

Coming back to Cahoot (the reason for this thread/post), they've always been really helpful with me, and mostly refunded the first type of charge on the first occasion of each one, when requested. EG: First DD, returned, First overlimit, returned etcetera, but I digress (don't feel sorry for them!)

 

I've sent my DSIR (data subject information request, why does everyone call it somthing different?) today and await to see how much the charges add up to.

 

I had a credit card and current account with them, whilst a student. I imagine the charges to be large as they were generally used as most student accounts are (near to the limit).

 

Any special rules on filing for Current Accounts and Credit Cards simultaneously?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Take 'em to court Bro' ...someone has to - it's a day out and a learning experience (and more than likely a pay day - although remembering the point, it is YOUR money in the first place - thieving muppets!)

 

We thought we were paying charges but really the banks were just putting our money into a nice 'protected' savings account for 6 years. bless! ...I would love to see Barclay's in court!

 

Power to the victims...I mean people!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have now received a written defence from Cahoot (Abbey).

 

Highlights include:

 

'The Claimant's contention that the said fees are uneforceable and/or are 'penalty charges' is denied. The fees reflect and are proortionate to the Defendant's administrative expenses incurred due to the Claimant's breach of contract and are a genuine pre-estimate of the damage suffered by the Defendant.'

 

they go on to say:

 

'Further or in the alternative, even if the said fees are not proportionate to the Defendant's administrative expenses incurred (which is denied), the Claimant remains liable to pay such fees as may be found to be proportionate and the Claimant is not entitled to claim repayment of the full amount of each charge made to the Account.'

 

then:

 

'No admissions are made as to the amounts claimed by the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof of the same.'

 

 

They have offered a £475 'goodwill gesture' as a full and final settlement.

 

Any advice would be appreciated? Does anyone think they actually go to court, or should I call their bluff?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have now received a written defence from Cahoot (Abbey).

 

Highlights include:

 

'The Claimant's contention that the said fees are uneforceable and/or are 'penalty charges' is denied. The fees reflect and are proortionate to the Defendant's administrative expenses incurred due to the Claimant's breach of contract and are a genuine pre-estimate of the damage suffered by the Defendant.'

 

they go on to say:

 

'Further or in the alternative, even if the said fees are not proportionate to the Defendant's administrative expenses incurred (which is denied), the Claimant remains liable to pay such fees as may be found to be proportionate and the Claimant is not entitled to claim repayment of the full amount of each charge made to the Account.'

 

then:

 

'No admissions are made as to the amounts claimed by the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof of the same.'

 

 

They have offered a £475 'goodwill gesture' as a full and final settlement.

 

Any advice would be appreciated? Does anyone think they actually go to court, or should I call their bluff?

 

Seems no-one else has responded to this... So I'll give it a go...:D

 

With any of this it all depends on your own pov and how much risk you are willing to take... I personally believe that if pushed they will back down and give you everything that you are owed.

 

It could go one of several ways if it does make it to court.

 

a) The court could find that these are indeed penalty charges and therefore order them to be repaid in full. :D

 

b) The court agrees that they are payment for service but not proportionate. This would then lead to one of 2 outcomes

 

i) The bank would demonstrate what a proportionate fee is which would involve them demonstrating how the cost(/loss) is calculated and then would have to repay you the difference - highly unlikely this has been asked for on many occasions always leading to silence in response

 

ii) The bank would refuse to demonstrate proportionality and would therefore have to repay you in full. :D

 

c) The court may find the charges proportionate and you lose the case :-o However I believe (as do most on here !) that this is so unlikely that the risk is almost negligible, especially in mind that the OFT has said that certainly anything over £12 is indefensible.

 

I think that this is a fairly standard scare tactic to try to mitigate their losses.

 

As ever with (I believe most if not) all advice given on this website, I am not qualified to give any advice and you are duly warned that any decisions are your own decisions made on your own account and no liability will be accepted for any advice followed ! Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

  • Confused 1

If you have found this post (or any other post) useful ensure you click on the scales in the top right of that post to give credit where credit is due.:D

 

DO YOU HAVE A WEBSITE AND WANT TO PROVIDE A VALUABLE LINK TO THIS FORUM ? Go to this thread:-http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=52854

 

As ever, with (I believe most if not) all advice given on this website, I am not qualified to give any advice and you are duly warned that any decisions are your own decisions made on your own account and no liability will be accepted for any advice followed ! Use your own judgment.

Seek advice of a qualified, insured, professional if you have any doubts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dinghy,

 

Wise words, and very valuable I feel. As such have responded to their defence (and their offer of half the payment) as follows:

 

Thank you for your correspondence dated 19 April 2006.

 

Dear [Cahoot solicitor],

 

I have carefully considered the defence filed on behalf of Abbey National plc. and have come to the conclusion that I must reject your offer of £457.00 in full and final settlement.

 

I have no need or desire to avoid filling in and returning the Allocation Questionnaire I have received (which I will be sending to Leeds County Court as instructed to arrive no later than 10th May 2006), and have absolutely no qualms about taking the matter to Court for a judge to decide the outcome.

 

For your information, I will not be seeking a 1 month postponement of further action so we may have more time to reach settlement.

 

It would be interesting, for my information, if you could provide a true indication of Abbey's administrative expenses incurred as a result of me going over my overdraft limit. I realise an organisation of Abbey's standing would have analysed such costs and would appreciate it if you could furnish me with the details.

 

I thank you for your time and hope to here from you soon regarding the costing details.

 

Yours sincerely,

Gumbodave!

 

 

Thought I might as well see if I could get in writing what they think the costs should be (though doubt they will respond with the figures). I'll see if they contact me in the next fw days and then get ready for court. Presumably if they do admit in court to their actual costs, that figure could be used in future as an estimate for other cases?

 

The fight continues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

p.s. Don't worry Dinghy, I really appreciate the advice, and wouldn't hold it against you or the Bank/Consumer Action Group if it all goes horribly wrong. I think this cause is too important to let the creditors get away with treading on consumers rights just so they can make a shed load of cash. The really losers are the ones who are so skint they cannot afford the internet to check this site out. I work for a debt charity and have been printing out the step by step guide and template letters and sending them to clients. Hopefully some of them can start getting some of their cash back too.

That's why I would be well up for court, to try to set a precedent that all banks/credit card companies would have to stick to without everyone having to go through all this to claim back retrospectively. It would be a mild disappointment if they bottled it. We'll see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Dinghy,

 

Wise words, and very valuable I feel.

 

You haven't clicked my scales though... ;)

 

Best of luck with it... My claim was issued exactly a week ago...

 

p.s. Don't worry Dinghy, I really appreciate the advice, and wouldn't hold it against you or the Bank/Consumer Action Group if it all goes horribly wrong.

 

I'm sure you wouldn't but there's a helluva lot of litigious people round here @ the moment ! :D :D :D

 

It never hurts to be too careful !;)


If you have found this post (or any other post) useful ensure you click on the scales in the top right of that post to give credit where credit is due.:D

 

DO YOU HAVE A WEBSITE AND WANT TO PROVIDE A VALUABLE LINK TO THIS FORUM ? Go to this thread:-http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=52854

 

As ever, with (I believe most if not) all advice given on this website, I am not qualified to give any advice and you are duly warned that any decisions are your own decisions made on your own account and no liability will be accepted for any advice followed ! Use your own judgment.

Seek advice of a qualified, insured, professional if you have any doubts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

'You haven't clicked my scales though...' I have now, Dinghy!

 

Looks like Cahoot don't fancy court afterall! Received this today:

 

'Mr Hanson,

 

In view of the amount that you are claiming and the legal costs that Abbey would incur in arranging defence and representation at the Court, the decision has been made that on this occasion, and in this case, your claim will be settled. However, this is on a "without prejudice" basis and is entirely without any admission of liability.

 

'I have therefore arranged for the sum of £833.59 (representing the claim of £753.59 and the Court fee of £80.00) to be paid into your account today in full and final settlement of your claim.

 

I should be grateful if you would inform the Court that this matter has now been resolved.'

 

 

Hope this gives the rest of you renewed hope that they won't go the full distance.

Good luck all!

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
'You haven't clicked my scales though...' I have now, Dinghy!
Ta !:cool:

 

Looks like Cahoot don't fancy court afterall! Received this today:

 

'Mr Hanson,

 

In view of the amount that you are claiming and the legal costs that Abbey would incur in arranging defence and representation at the Court, the decision has been made that on this occasion, and in this case, your claim will be settled. However, this is on a "without prejudice" basis and is entirely without any admission of liability.

 

'I have therefore arranged for the sum of £833.59 (representing the claim of £753.59 and the Court fee of £80.00) to be paid into your account today in full and final settlement of your claim.

 

I should be grateful if you would inform the Court that this matter has now been resolved.'

 

 

Hope this gives the rest of you renewed hope that they won't go the full distance.

Good luck all!

 

Congrats... It was worth that very small gamble then !


If you have found this post (or any other post) useful ensure you click on the scales in the top right of that post to give credit where credit is due.:D

 

DO YOU HAVE A WEBSITE AND WANT TO PROVIDE A VALUABLE LINK TO THIS FORUM ? Go to this thread:-http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=52854

 

As ever, with (I believe most if not) all advice given on this website, I am not qualified to give any advice and you are duly warned that any decisions are your own decisions made on your own account and no liability will be accepted for any advice followed ! Use your own judgment.

Seek advice of a qualified, insured, professional if you have any doubts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PS (just to save the mods posting this...:D ) make sure you complete their survey (http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/survey.php) if you haven't done already...


If you have found this post (or any other post) useful ensure you click on the scales in the top right of that post to give credit where credit is due.:D

 

DO YOU HAVE A WEBSITE AND WANT TO PROVIDE A VALUABLE LINK TO THIS FORUM ? Go to this thread:-http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=52854

 

As ever, with (I believe most if not) all advice given on this website, I am not qualified to give any advice and you are duly warned that any decisions are your own decisions made on your own account and no liability will be accepted for any advice followed ! Use your own judgment.

Seek advice of a qualified, insured, professional if you have any doubts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All done on the survey.

 

I was just getting psyched up for a court room battle as well! Alas, it will fall on some other's shoulders to get these rascals stitched up in the courts and set that all important precedant that proves banks are indeed exploitative in their business practices and couldn't give a monkey's about consumer welfare or anything that didn't end in zeros.

 

Hurray for Bank Action Group!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats Gumbodave!! I'm just about to send out the preliminary approach for repayment letter for £1188.48. Hope I get the same result as you have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent news - I'm taking these badboys to court myself - Can't wait to unload my "A FEW GOOD MEN" court room scene on them.:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was just a thought,,as you are in the business of helping people who are financially leg locked, perhaps it would be possible for you to help them get their charges back as well.

 

Also dont forget to donate to the site. I would be in queer street without it.

 

Congratulations by the way

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic was closed on 03/07/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 5141 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...