Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello Friends. I cannot believe it but im being evicted again, i was given a section 48 notice 4 months into my tenancy. I already went through this process last year, i overstayed in my last place by a few months and left on 6th Oct 2023. I knew to check all the documentation that they sent to see if the notice is legal, it looks like it is. I took this place out of desperation as i had to vacate that last place. I hate this place so im not bothered about leaving it.    These cowboys lied to me when i viewed the house. I told the agent that i was evicted from my last house and naturally i dont want this to happen again. She said  the landlord has no plans to sell the house. What she did not tell me was that the landlord had tried to sell the house last year and failed. So it looks like they have used me to fill in the short period of time until its time to sell again. I did see it advertised online.   I told them im not in a strong enough financial position to find another property, cost of a deposit, 1 months rent and moving costs.   They have told me they are starting legal proceedings. They have sent me an invoice for £395 but i have not even received the court paperwork.    I dont like the job im in so i have decided to relocate to a better job and hopefully find cheaper rentals.   I can post a copy of the notice if needed.  
    • yes a judgement sorry I used the wrong word before
    • Hi So on Friday I received a copy on email from the claimants solicitors with an attached relief from sanctions application - on the basis that the solicitor missed the deadline for the additional directions and it was an oversight on their part and that the claimant should therefore not suffer.   They then attached a copy of the deed of assignment and a new witness statement.  They stated that they would be happy to delay the court date by 28 days but that they believed both parties were ready for the court case on 7th June. My first question, is there anything I need to do or do I just sit and wait to see what is decided?  Secondly, is it likely the judge will be aware that the claimants solicitors did exactly the same in the set aside court case (ie they filed their court bundle late and applied for relief from sanctions on the morning of the court date, and my solicitors had no choice but to agree because they threatened to strike my case out because my solicitors had only filed their court bundle by email and not post).  This is a clear pattern of how these solicitors work rather than it being a one off oversight! 
    • I shall find the link later this evening. It was about couples not living together but being liable for council tax. I was never married or in an official civil partnership. We lived together for 18 months, I then left for 6 months for work but continued to pay my half of the bills and rent.   We then split up I gave up my tenancy she took it all in her name. She then decided to move in with me 5 months later. She then banned me from going back to my house eventually let me back in then called the police. Took over my house and is now only paying the rent not the bills so I will be landed with those to. So over the course of our relationship I have ended up paying her debts for 5 different addresses, personal loans and credit cards. If I refuse to pay them she makes more accusations.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

forced to work on a self employed basis and breaks deducted from wages

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4540 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts


i am hoping someone can help me. I have been working as a driver for the past 9 months with the same company. Recently the boss more or less forced the drivers to work on a self employed basis, the reason given that there would be no work for any drivers working on an agency basis. like many at the moment i could not afford to not have an income. so reluctantly agreed.

Is this constructive dismissal??


Also they are deducting half an hours wages for breaks. regardless if taken or not. im not a commercial driver so no legislation exists on working hours. If im self employed can breaks legally be deducted.

hope someone can help!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you have an original contract, obviously going from being paid by an agency to being self employed is quite a change. How are you now getting paid ?. Normally being self employed you either use an umrella company or you have a Ltd company setup yourself, you then sort out all the tax, etc issues yourself, which canm be very benificial as you (and the employer) pay less tax however there are lots of rules about this and can be quite complex.



Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. i was employed by the agency. The people who own the agency owned the company i drive for. (tax fiddle maybe??) i worked for them for 8 months straight. Im led to beleive if you work for the same company for 13 weeks continuous. you have same rights as a direct employee. To answer your question though. I now invoice the company for hours worked each week and i am then paid fortnightly direct to my account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally though I thought if you were self employed then an agency cant pay you directly by law, that it why many 'umbrella' companies exist or you yoursel;f have to setup a limited company, whenever Ive done self employed work, they dont pay me directly, ive used umbrella company or my brothers ltd company he set up for that very reason.


How is the tax and NI calculated ?



Link to post
Share on other sites

The agency is no longer paying me. the company i was working for via the agency is. i just invoice them. i only started self emp 2 weeks ago so i now have to pay my own ni and tax. I feel that we have been held to ransom really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well..I would of thought it was a new contract really but no dont really know if they can 'finish' your old one like they did, really its as if a new contract has started, still being self employed is normally a benefit, you can pay less Tax, less Ni plus can offset expenses such as travel and food against tax.


Id check its legal for them to pay you directly though, I was under the impression that YOU had to set up a Ltd Company and then payments would go to that company.


There are rather complex IR35 rules that apply (basically to stop people using it as loophole to pay less tax).


You must also tell the HMRC you are self employed they then send you the info. at tax return time.


Being self employed can be a bit of a hassle so normally youd be paid a few quid more than you would normally (you are also saving the employer money !).



Link to post
Share on other sites

You need a years service for constructive dismissal and also need to be an employee and have to resign.


Secondly, the agency worker regs state that you get the same rights to pay and holiday after 12 weeks but it shouldn't help you either. Also, those weeks only start running from 1st October so you havent completed them yet.


The agency are probably doing this to avoid the regulations (maybe fairly). do other people work there doing the same job but on better rates?


Further, being called self employed and invoicing doesn't make you self employed, there was an horizon or panorama show on a few weeks ago that explained this simply and very well - should be able to find it on iplayer - if you want a better explanation just ask but it ma not help with your current query.

Edited by Offkey81
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...