Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4229 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I very stupidly decided to steal items from TK Maxx.

 

I was caught, and the Police were called.

 

The total amount in goods was around £120, and I returned them to the store.

 

I honestly don't know what was running through my head at the time, perhaps just, ohh, I may be able to get that for free if I steal it.

 

I am now feeling like a foolish wreck and will never do it again.

 

The police were called as I am 19 year old female student and in University and I have to pay a £80 fine to Thames Valley Police.

I was also issued with a Notice of Intended Civil Recovery.

 

I WILL NEVER DO THIS AGAIN! And I JUST FEEL SO ASHAMED AND GUILTY.

 

I was wondering how much the Civil Recovery charge would perhaps amount to, as I am a student and don't have much money to live on, let alone pay this fee, and I'm feeling really scared.

I don't want my parents to find out.

 

I am so sorry and scared, and also wondered if there were people I am able to email and to get some advice.

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll no doubt get a letter from RLP asking for money/damages, have a read through all the other threads about this on here and read the CAB Report (and RLP's reply), whilst TK MAxx/RLP may in theory have a claim for damages against you, they clearly are not confident enough to pursue someone all the way through the court process and win BUT you will no doubt be hassled by RLP but you can either ignore the letters, write back denying you owe them anything or pay them.

 

Have a search around and youll find good advice on all the other threads.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy so much for replying.

 

I will definitely be keeping an eye out for those RLP letters!

 

Do I need to pay the £80 for penalty notice from the police?

 

Also, I wondered how much this would affect my future job prospects.

It would be awful if this very foolish mistake I made had an impact on the rest of my life. This all feels very overwhelming at the moment, and I have learned my lesson for sure!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I need to pay the £80 for penalty notice from the police?

 

 

EErr..I would of thought so, no expert on this, but I would of thought non-payment would leave you open to arrest.

 

As for Job Prospects, this has been bought up before, I guess you could kiss goodbye to woprking at TK MAxx and associated stores, there has also been talk of some sort of 'blacklist' that other stores may have access to, Im unsure of this and it may well breach data protection rules.

 

Unfortuneatly there are a great many youngsters who do something stupid and find it haunts them in later life, I assume that the £80 'fine' means that there is no police record as such, but Im not sure whether such things show up on advanced CRB checks.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you MUST pay the Police (unless you decide to be dealt with by a Court) or this could result in a criminal conviction. RLP you can argue with.

 

What exactly was the type of Penalty given to you? Although the Penalty itself is not recorded as a Conviction, the fact that you were arrested and dealt with by way of a Penalty Notice will almost certainly leave a trace which could be disclosed if you ever apply for a job where an Enhanced CRB is required.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've recieved two letters from RLP to date, demanding I pay them £187.50.

 

1. I don't know if i should write back demanding a breakdown for the actual cat, because I know that £187.50 is way more than any damages to TKMaxx, a number RLP plucked from nothing. As i have returned all items undamaged, I don't think this could affect the sale of the objects.

 

2. However, I am afraid of my "details" remaining on their databases for 6 years, and whether this will affect my future life/ mortgages/ banking/ employment.

3. I am also afraid of them taking any sort of legal action against me, as police were involved, and if I am sued or taken to courts.

 

4. However, I do not have £187.50 to pay RLP, being a student. My student loans barely cover my living expenses.

 

5. Perhaps if I get my father to write them a letter responding they may take me more seriously.

 

6. I've looked around on this site, where many people have been advised to just leave the letters alone and not reply back. I'm not sure if I should do this. I am scared RLP will take even more drastic actions.

 

I am just unsure of what to do.

 

Also, when I was at TKMaxx, the security guard threatened me that bailiffs would come round to my accommodation and take my stuff if I do not pay the charges. I am just really not sure what to do....

 

Please help. I have attached the two letters I have received so far.

 

Thanks!

DSCN0270.jpg

DSCN0271.jpg

DSCN0274.jpg

DSCN0277.jpg

DSCN0279.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

£187.50 is a pretty standard amount for RLP. It is a 'pre-estimate' of damages rather than actual costs incurred and is one of the main reasons why RLP would be unlikely to succeed in a Court case.

 

I have never come across anybody with any experience of their 'database'. Not saying that they don't have one, but I don't believe that it is used by too many people. It certainly wn't affect any official record or credit file so cannot possibly affect future credit or banking facilities and is VERY unlikely to ever affect employment.

 

A letter from your father will simply show that they have a fish on the hook and will lead to them cranking up the threats. It won't carry any more weight than if you were to write yourself - TO TELL THEM THAT YOU DON'T OWE THEM AND WON'T BE PAYING!

 

What more drastic action can they take? Of all the threads here, not one person has come back having had a claim issued in Court. The vast majority have ignored the threats until they stopped, and a very small number paid up because, like you, they were too worried. All that has done is to give money away that they needn't have done.

 

The security guard was talking out of his backside. Bailiffs can only be instructed IF a claim is issued by the Court, IF a Judgement is entered and IF you then don't pay the Judgement. That is a million miles from where you are now and is incredibly unlikely to happen.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore their first letter. Don't telephone them.

 

When they send their second begging letter, send a single line reply "I deny any liability to you or your client" - nothing else, nothing from your dad or anyone else. Send 2nd class but get a certificate of posting.

 

Then ignore anything else they send.

 

RLP CANNOT take you to court - they are nothing to do with the shop The shop could take you to court to recover their losses - round about zero - so there's no chance of that

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are pretty automated, they will send those letters regardless.

 

Hi, thanks for the replies.

 

I was thinking of sending a letter, but I thought if I did, they would pester me more and more.

 

I was thinking of perhaps ignoring them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a read through the CAB, some of the letters sent by the loss recovery companies actually seem quite threatening, and some even said that they were going to go to the resident's house!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So would you recommend I completely ignore the letters, or send one back with the one liner,

"I deny any liability to you or your client" and not respond to future letters?

 

Once again, thank you guys very much, I really appreciate all your help and support and will NEVER find myself in this situation again! I will always have this guilt and the criminal mark against my name, which could possibly affect my future choices, but at least I have learned from this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So would you recommend I completely ignore the letters, or send one back with the one liner,

"I deny any liability to you or your client" and not respond to future letters?

 

Once again, thank you guys very much, I really appreciate all your help and support and will NEVER find myself in this situation again! I will always have this guilt and the criminal mark against my name, which could possibly affect my future choices, but at least I have learned from this.

 

Definitely - 2nd class after you get their 2nd letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just been sent a third letter saying their client is now in a position to issue court proceedings against me.

 

I guess I will be writing that letter tomorrow and sending it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Standard letter. Send off your response!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just been sent a third letter saying their client is now in a position to issue court proceedings against me.

 

I guess I will be writing that letter tomorrow and sending it!

 

HHmm..but they never do..odd that !

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...