Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me against the Halifax - Advice please.


1DEBS
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Found this site quite by accident after reading an article on AOL re: claiming back your bank charges. Just like to say what a fantastic job you are all doing for us, the common people. THANKS!!!

Anyway, gathered all relevant info and sent off my preliminary letter to the Halifax on 19th September. I received...surprise...a standard letter saying someone will be in touch with me within four weeks to discuss my complaint. Do I still go ahead and issue the LBA in 14 days if I have not heard from them, and if i do hear from them offering say, a small fraction of what i am claiming as a goodwill gesture, do i give them another 14 days to cough up the full amount and should I still go ahead and claim the full amount through the court as per my original schedule. Or should i accept the offer, would a court still award me the full amount in light of the offer.

Hope that makes sense. Would be grateful for any feedback.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you read the FAQ's? everything you need to know is there.

 

Do not stick to their timescales stick to yours....so yes once the 14 days given in the prelim letter passes, then issue the LBA providing another 14 days. If you receive a offer which is less than you're claiming, the write back saying you accept this as an interim offer, however you are still pursuing for the rest and that the clock is ticking.

 

Once the 14 days of the LBA runs out, if you haven't received your money in full then start your court claim.

Lloyds TSB - £972

S.A.R, prelim and LBA sent

Claim acknowledged

Defence received

AQ 20/06/06

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 20/07/06***

 

Woolwich - £2288

S.A.R, prelim and LBA sent.

Offered half

Moneyclaim filed online 02/08/06

Judgement filed online 23/08/06

WARRANT FILED ONLINE 30/08/06

MONEY RECEIVED BY BALIFF 04/10/06

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 09/10/06***

 

Smile - £175

Pelim 23/06/06

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 07/07/06***

 

My Ex vs Woolwich - £715

S.A.R sent 30/08/06

Pelim 06/10/06

LBA 20/10/06

 

Advice & opinions provided are personal, and not endorsed by CAG or BAG, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Oh my God!!! PANIC...PANIC...

Quick update, I sent my prelim letter requesting refund of £444 in charges and just before 14 days was up I received a letter from the Halifax offering as a "goodwill gesture" £268 in full and final settlement and the usual threatening to close my account if i do not manage it properly. I wrote back declining offer but willing to accept it as part payment etc etc. I have now received a letter back from the Halifax saying that as I have not accepted their offer of £268 they will not be refunding me any of the charges i have incurred since opening my account (although I have only claimed for the last six years and held an account with them for 18 years). They say if i am not happy I can go to the Financial Ombudsman Service with my complaint. The 14 days since my second letter is up on 23rd October.

Please can someone tell me what to do now, do I still go ahead with my court claim? Are they likely to defend it and are they likely to win. Are the banks getting tough now because of the number of people demanding refunds.

I am feeling slightly bullied by the bank and a little confused,i have read other peoples threads and i cant find one where the bank has withdrawn their offer and refused to pay anything.

Any advice and help would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

send LBA. wait 14 days issue MCOL.

 

they paid in full 3 days after MCOL plus 8% interest.

 

remember you are in control not them!

when i win ...... 5% goes back to the site!

 

Halifax- 14/6/06 Data Protection Act.28/6/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) - (Subject Access Request) handed in person. 2/7/06 Prelin sent for £3297. 19/7/06 LBA sent SETTLED

Halifax cc- 26/7 prelim for £140 - 14/8 LBA sent - 21/8 £ 70 offer - 22/8 Halifax agreed to pay £140 after call SETTLED

Halifax loan #1 - SETTLED

SMPL- 20/6/06 prelim sent for £610 4/7 sent lba after no reply. MCOL 29/9

Rooftop Mortgages - 20/6/06 prelim sent for £225. 29/6/06 letter rec'd saying no! /2/7/06 LBA sent

Capital One- 24/6/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent. 2/7/06 prelim sent for £137. 19/7/06 LBA sent MCOL 29/9 SETTLED

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debs you need to go to the Halifax forum now and start a new thread to keep updated with details of your claim, it will receive a much better repsonse in there as this is just a welcome furm to direct those in need or direction to the banks forums etc, here is the link http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank/

 

thanks! :)

 

oh and by the way mark above is correct in what he says!, follow his advice:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

Go ahead with your claim, they are bluffing. All of the banks do this and look who is winning.

 

Stick to your timetable. Have your parachute account opened and let them do their darndest.

 

Way to go;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debs you need to go to the Halifax forum now and start a new thread to keep updated with details of your claim, it will receive a much better repsonse in there as this is just a welcome furm to direct those in need or direction to the banks forums etc, here is the link http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk.../halifax-bank/

 

thanks! :-)

 

 

All the answers you need are in the Halifax forum including a forum on sucesses which you can read for hours and hours and will give you an idea of how far most had to go!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...