Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

DPA - Cahoot


keld
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6586 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I sent my first DPA letter to Cahoot on 9th March and my second including the £10 on 21st March 2006. Am I right that the 40 days starts from 21st?

 

Thanks.

KELD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've just received a voicemail and this email in response to my DPA letter.

 

'Dear Mrs D,

I am e-mailing following your letter of 21st March regarding your cahoot accounts.

I've today attempted to call you in relation to your letter. I'd be grateful if you could advise me via e-mail at: [email protected], of a convenient time and number to discuss the points you've raised.

Yours sincerely,

David Freeman,

cahoot Service Relationship Manager.

 

'I have emailed the following. 'Dear Mr Freeman, I don't have regular access to a phone at the moment, please email with your queries. Regards, Mrs D'

KELD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've just received this from Cahoot.

 

'Dear Mrs D,

 

I am e-mailing following your letter of 21st March 2006 regarding your cahoot accounts. I had hoped to discuss this with you in person but will attempt to address your concerns in this e-mail.

 

Having reviewed the request outlined in your letter I am of the opinion that it might be in both parties interest not to complete a full Subject Access request. I understand your are asking for a list of charges you've incurred throughout your accounts history. I've listed this below for your information.

 

*******

 

3/03/05 £25.00

 

*******

 

9/02/05 £20.00

14/02/05 £20.00

24/12/05 £20.00

01/05/03 £25.00

31/03/03 £25.00 (This charge was refunded on 22nd April 2003)

 

I understand that you wish to contest the legitimacy of these charges. I've reviewed your account history and can see that these were incurred as a result of isolated incidents. I've considered this matter sympathetically and, in the interests of customer retention and as a gesture of goodwill, I'd like to refund the £110 you've incurred. I'd be grateful if you could confirm whether you wish to accept this in settlement of your complaint via e-mail at: [email protected].

 

Should you still require the Subject Access Request, please advise me via e-mail and I'll make the necessary arrangements. We would be unable to consider refunding the £10 as this is a fair representation of the cost of producing the request.

 

Thank you for taking the time to bring this matter to my attention.

 

If you've any further queries or wish to discuss anything in greater depth, please do not hesitate to contact me.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

David Freeman,

cahoot Service Relationship Manager.

 

 

*********************

Internet communications are not necessarily secure and may be intercepted or changed after they are sent. cahoot does not accept liability for any such changes. If you wish to confirm the origin or content of this communication, please contact the sender using an alternative means of communication.

 

This communication does not create or modify any contract.

 

This email may contain confidential information intended solely for use by the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication you should destroy it without copying, disclosing or otherwise using its contents.

 

Please notify the sender immediately of the error.

 

cahoot is a division of Abbey National plc.

Abbey National plc is registered in England, registered number 2294747.

Registered Office: Abbey National House, 2 Triton Square, Regent's Place, London, NW1 3AN.

 

 

--

No virus found in this incoming message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition.

Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.5/301 - Release Date: 04/04/2006'

 

Just goes to show what you get if you ask. So what do you think take the money and tell everyone to have a go?

KELD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The money has been credited to my bank account. I can't believe that two letters and two emails have got me £110 so easily.

 

Thanks again. Now just to get TSB, Mint and Coop.

KELD

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/07/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

KELD

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6586 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...