Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Kwik fit how to complain


casper1963
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4265 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi booked my car (chrysler voyager) in for a front break check Knowing my pads where low having covered 12000 miles since last set of pads and new discs fitted by kwick fit.

 

on the day my wife took the car in for me some time later a fitter comes back and tells my wife will they had the car on the ramp they decided to do a rear break check aswell and that they had found that both rear brake cylinders where leakin and had contaminated the break drums and would need new cylinders,brake drums + fixing kit and brake pads costing £475 then went on to say we would proberly need front discs as well at £150 so toal £625 .

 

when my wife said no to the work they tried to convince her that she couldnt take the car as it was un road worthy she then said we didnt have the money at the time to pay for the repairs they said she could leave the car there till she had the funds.

Anyway some 2hrs latter and some arguing they agreed to put the car bk together so she could leave.

 

Today we took the car to a chrysler specialist for a second oppinion any way what kwik fit had told her was nothing but lies the the front discs where as good as new drivers side rear brakes had no faults drum,pads and cylinder fine, offside rear drum and pads fine and a slight leak from the cylinder so all that was needed was the front pads as we new plus one rear cylinder.

 

surely this not exceptable conduct from kwik fit, any advice as how to deal with this would be apprciated

Regards casper

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Fill in this form from their Customer Services as this will be dealt with by head office, better if you get the name of the Operations Manager at the Branch also.

 

http://www.kwik-fit.com/customer-comments.asp

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Fill in this form from their Customer Services as this will be dealt with by head office, better if you get the name of the Operations Manager at the Branch also.

 

http://www.kwik-fit.com/customer-comments.asp

 

Cheers for that will fill that in and send off will post bk when i get a response

regards casper

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are charlatans and well known for this sort of thing.

 

Best avoided... a friend of mnie ws told she needed a new exhaust + cat (£480) on an old car car worth £400.

 

Can't be welded, can't separate cat from rest, nothing we can do etc.

 

She booked it in.

 

I got her to book it out and a £25 weld later from a guy I know and she was on her way.

 

That was 3 1/2 years ago and now 3 MOT tests later.

 

Charlatans

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always buy my tyres from Kwik **it. Not just because they are competitive but because I take great pleasure in getting the keys back and then giving them back to them with the words " now go back and do it properley".

The brake report always makes interesting reading as does the shock absorber report. One of them once read, "rear struts leaking"............er it has torsion bar suspension.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always buy my tyres from Kwik **it. Not just because they are competitive but because I take great pleasure in getting the keys back and then giving them back to them with the words " now go back and do it properley".

The brake report always makes interesting reading as does the shock absorber report. One of them once read, "rear struts leaking"............er it has torsion bar suspension.

Seems a bit daft; they could damage your car out of spite if you wind them up. just go to somewhere you can trust in the first place !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi booked my car (chrysler voyager) in for a front break check Knowing my pads where low having covered 12000 miles since last set of pads and new discs fitted by kwick fit.

 

on the day my wife took the car in for me some time later a fitter comes back and tells my wife will they had the car on the ramp they decided to do a rear break check aswell and that they had found that both rear brake cylinders where leakin and had contaminated the break drums and would need new cylinders,brake drums + fixing kit and brake pads costing £475 then went on to say we would proberly need front discs as well at £150 so toal £625 .

 

when my wife said no to the work they tried to convince her that she couldnt take the car as it was un road worthy she then said we didnt have the money at the time to pay for the repairs they said she could leave the car there till she had the funds.

Anyway some 2hrs latter and some arguing they agreed to put the car bk together so she could leave.

 

Today we took the car to a chrysler specialist for a second oppinion any way what kwik fit had told her was nothing but lies the the front discs where as good as new drivers side rear brakes had no faults drum,pads and cylinder fine, offside rear drum and pads fine and a slight leak from the cylinder so all that was needed was the front pads as we new plus one rear cylinder.

 

surely this not exceptable conduct from kwik fit, any advice as how to deal with this would be apprciated

Regards casper

 

Hi Casper

 

We were concerned to read about your wife's experience with Kwik Fit. We would like to discuss this further with you if you dont mind - I will drop you a message with my contact email address to discuss further.

 

Kind regards,

Gerry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Casper

 

We were concerned to read about your wife's experience with Kwik Fit. We would like to discuss this further with you if you dont mind - I will drop you a message with my contact email address to discuss further.

 

Kind regards,

Gerry

 

Hi Casper

 

Sorry unable to send you a message, please email me on: kwikfitwebcare AT kwik-fit DOT com.

 

Thanks

Gerry

Link to post
Share on other sites

We got caught the same way many years ago and being naive agreed to the work. A week later we ran into the previous owner who advised that all the brakes a etc had been changed about a month prior to him selling the car. He posted the receipts to us, but by that time we were a couple of hundred quid down. Seems that this issue has been happening for quite a number of years with this "fault"

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this Gerry chap doesn't deliver then write to Sir Tam Farmer the owner of kwik fit at their head office.

 

Sir Tom is one of a few "Sirs" in the Scottish motor trade who's business practices are of dubious reputation.

 

The zombies who work in this part of the motor trade are paid in part by sales related bonuses hence such complaints.

 

As Surfer says, this has been going on for years.

 

The story in this area about kwik fit is that many years ago an old codger went into his local branch and asked for a part of his exhaust to be replaced.

He was told they don't do this but would replace the whole system which would give him a long warranty.

He agreed and his car was taken up on a ramp.

 

Shortly after, the depot mouth piece came and informed him (bad news) that he had a leaking rear shocker.

The codger agreed to replace to which the mouth replied that they had to be replaced in pairs. Again the codger agreed.

 

When the work was completed the mouth presented the codger with a huge bill at which point the codger said he needed to get into the glove compartment.

 

From here he produced a receipt showing that the shockers had recently been renewed by kwik fit under their lifetime guarntee. So the old guy paid the exhaust and drove away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have now emailed Gerry at Kwik Fit copy of email below minus the attachments.

 

Dear Gerry thank you for responding to my post on the consumer action group which i have copied and pasted below for ease of reference i have all so attached the quote which has also been posted on CAG i look forward to your response as to how this sort of conduct can be allowed to be carried out in your garages in particular i believe they tried to take advantage of a female who they thought to be a push over to the point were two employees tried thee old double act trick of further trying to get her to have these unnessary repairs.

 

Further more as per Kwik Fits life time guarantee we did not get our free brake pad change because they kept argueing that the discs needed replacing dispite the fact they were in very good condition as they were only relaced by Kwik Fit 12000 miles previous, by this time my wife really had had enough and demanded the car be put back together so she could leave.

 

Now as the brake pads were in fact needed sh took the car to another garage were the pads were replaced at a cost of £80 ( which i trust given the circumstnces you will be refunding to us. )

After this work was carried out the car was then taken to a specialist to have all the brakes examined the results of which are in the post you replied to.

 

I will now await your reply and at the sametime i will be considering sending a copy of this email and all relevent information to Trading Standards, Watchdog and the local press.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok had a response from Kwik Fit who have agreed to send us a cheque for the work carried out at another garage and have assured us that the 2 employees involved will be repremanded but didnt explain how this would actually stop the same to other customers in the future, so will poss send all the details to trading standards or watch dog havnt made my mind up on that one yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, casper.

 

Was the reply from Gerry the rep, glad you got something back.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Hi yes it was then he past it on to our area manger whos office happens to be above the kwik fit centre in question went down stares got it sorted strait away and the guys in question had voided the brake check so had nothing to back there side up lol.

 

Not sure it wont happen to someone else though .

 

Regards casper

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this must be very common at Kwik Fit these days - perhaps the pressure of the recession is starting to make them cut corners.

 

Recently we had our ageing but very reliable V40 in kwik Fit for an MOT. They told my wife the rear discs / calipers and pads needed changing to pass the MOT and that the exhaust was blowing. I went to pick the car up to have a look and thought they were trying to pull a fast one so took it to the Volvo main dealer to check. They said the car was perfect and put it through its MOT and it passed with no advisories. And as for the exhaust, it made the noise it was meant to make, a sort of pretendy sporty grrrrr.

 

The other thing that annoyed me was the price Kwik Fit quoted. Something ridiculous like £750 - they said to my wife it was because our V40 was a rare premium car lol. Infact, its the bottom of the range, even has wind up windows. The only thing premium about it is it's looked after!

 

My advice is that some kwik fits are only interested in a fast buck and you should always get a second quote. ATS is often much cheaper...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this must be very common at Kwik Fit these days - perhaps the pressure of the recession is starting to make them cut corners.

 

Recently we had our ageing but very reliable V40 in kwik Fit for an MOT. They told my wife the rear discs / calipers and pads needed changing to pass the MOT and that the exhaust was blowing. I went to pick the car up to have a look and thought they were trying to pull a fast one so took it to the Volvo main dealer to check. They said the car was perfect and put it through its MOT and it passed with no advisories. And as for the exhaust, it made the noise it was meant to make, a sort of pretendy sporty grrrrr.

 

The other thing that annoyed me was the price Kwik Fit quoted. Something ridiculous like £750 - they said to my wife it was because our V40 was a rare premium car lol. Infact, its the bottom of the range, even has wind up windows. The only thing premium about it is it's looked after!

 

My advice is that some kwik fits are only interested in a fast buck and you should always get a second quote. ATS is often much cheaper...

 

Did you make a formal complaint to them ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I didn't. Frankly I was relieved that the car passed it's mot without massive further expense. With hindsight I should have complained - it was only this year so perhaps our resident Official Kwik Fit Cagger can comment.

 

 

(Edit)

Edited by maroondevo52
Removed unsuitable comment.
Link to post
Share on other sites

No I didn't. Frankly I was relieved that the car passed it's mot without massive further expense. With hindsight I should have complained - it was only this year so perhaps our resident Official Kwik Fit Cagger can comment

 

Indeed it would good if he could post his comments on all the above goings on and what is being done to rectify these issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this must be very common at Kwik Fit these days - perhaps the pressure of the recession is starting to make them cut corners.

 

Recently we had our ageing but very reliable V40 in kwik Fit for an MOT. They told my wife the rear discs / calipers and pads needed changing to pass the MOT and that the exhaust was blowing. I went to pick the car up to have a look and thought they were trying to pull a fast one so took it to the Volvo main dealer to check. They said the car was perfect and put it through its MOT and it passed with no advisories. And as for the exhaust, it made the noise it was meant to make, a sort of pretendy sporty grrrrr.

 

The other thing that annoyed me was the price Kwik Fit quoted. Something ridiculous like £750 - they said to my wife it was because our V40 was a rare premium car lol. Infact, its the bottom of the range, even has wind up windows. The only thing premium about it is it's looked after!

 

My advice is that some kwik fits are only interested in a fast buck and you should always get a second quote. ATS is often much cheaper...

 

Hi there,

 

We saw your comments above. If there's anything about your experience that you'd like to discuss with us directly, then please feel free to send me an email - kwikfitwebcare AT kwik-fit DOT com

 

Kind regards,

Gerry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gerry,

 

We managed to get out of there without losing money so we have nothing to complain about really. To be fair, when we purchased the car ages ago, I was a bit suspicious of the kind of farty noise the exhaust made so I took it to my local Kwik Fit and the guy stuck it on the ramp and explained it all to me in a very professional manner and reassured me that there was absolutely nothing to worry about - all at no cost. That was very good, just like the adverts that stated how trustworthy and honest kwik fit are.

 

After the recent experience, I have no reason not to believe and have no doubt that your company would have ripped off my wife - without question.

 

So, what we do now is to allow Kwik Fit to give quotes for work our cars need and then go elsewhere and price match. Suprisingly, even our Volvo main dealer will price match. As for ATS, they have consistently been cheaper than Kwik fit, recently quoting us exctly half the price of Kwik Fit for rear discs and trimmings on our XC90.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

having problems with kwik fit after catalytic converter for my citreon picasso rang up asked if they could price match said they couldnt go that low. I rang customer services and e mailed them no reply to numerous e mails, had to ring again stated not part of the exhaust system so it could not be price matched. Lady was very aggressive and impolite when i stated that it suggested on there website that it was my g/f could hear her raised voice from the other room!!. havent even had teh decency to reply to my messages appauling service and inflated prices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the more people i speak to about the issue we have the more i hear of other peoples bad expiriences with Kwick Fit

 

I would still like to here from gerry as to what action was taken against the 2 muppets that tried to fleece my mrs

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4265 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...