Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ofcourse you wont be playing twice. i think you dont fully  understand how a secured loan nor a ccj works.   You should have a charge dated from when you signed up to welcome against the property. That reminds until settled.   The fact someone, could have been welcome more likely cabot ? Got a default ccj in oct 2014 doesn't change anything with regards to what you ultimately pay, just a few more fee as it went to court   Your credit file will show who got the ccj Your online deeds will show you who owns the charge now.   I suspect as welcome vanished in 2012 if not before i suggest the debt was sold on ? And the above won't show welcomes name?    
    • What date of issue on the claim form ?   Andy
    • Many thanks..yes I did not want to give any indication that I was aware I had parked on the site at any point especially written down. That said I will keep the new entry in. Do I need to add their ref no etc at the top of the letter and or date of infringement? 
    • Hi, thank you for the quick response.     Yes we asked them for the original credit agreement but they only sent a statement of previous payments and charges, etc. Looking back at the communications, we actually asked for this information a year ago and they sprang into life a few months ago.     The letter of claim only referenced the OD not the credit card.   The last feedback we got from them was that they thought the credit card debt was not statute barred and would be sending information over regarding the OD.   Do I need to mention anything specific in the SRA to Lloyds?
    • I have AoS using MCOL. Slight issue in that it has an old address listed and I had no way of changing it using the system. I have emailed mcol@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk to ask them to amend/update, but don't know if that will work. Regardless, at this point I don't think it changes what i need to do - but correct me if I'm wrong.   So, next step would ordinarily be "get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors asking for all relevant bills" Is that correct? Having said that, I have copies of the bills from Eon, and Lowell have also sent me copies of bills. Should i still go ahead with this regardless?   Folowing this, my next step would be filing my defence, correct? And, now that I've done the AoS. I'd really appreciate a sanity check on when I need to file my defence by if that is indeed the next step.   I'll be looking at more threads. I'd like to be able to put all of this to one side until Feb 3rd (I have an absolutely crucial - 5 years of work to get to it - deadline of 2nd Feb for something I'm working on that is totally unrelated but is eating up all my time until then). Am I correct in thinking it's okay to leave this until Feb 3rd now??   Thanks again for your help thus far. Donation made.
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

Help with Lloyds TSB PPI (Asset Card)


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2483 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I have received a reply from Lloyds asking for a signature in order to process the request. (The cheque used for payment was from my partners bank account, so obviously its not on there.)

 

Is this required for a SAR or are they trying it on?

 

They do give me the option of going to my local branch with some form of ID to collect it instead though!

 

Which is best?

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

branch if its not miles away

however there is no harm in signing the request

its not as if its them after YOU.

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
branch if its not miles away

however there is no harm in signing the request

its not as if its them after YOU.

 

dx

 

 

dx

 

 

Branch is only about 1 1/2 miles away in town so not very far at all.

 

I already have the credit agreement for this account anyway and it already has my signature on it, so it's not as if they might lift it!

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Well by my reckoning the 40 days are up and still no SAR!:-(

 

Will the fact that they returned the request to ask for a signature have reset the clock, or is a signature not mandatory?

 

The cheque has been cashed by the way.

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Fuming!!!:-x:-x:-x

 

I have received a letter from Lloyds TSB stating that because I no longer have any active accounts with them, they cannot send my SAR documents to my house.

It must instead be sent to a branch of my choice where I must show some form of ID to collect the parcel.

 

In their previous letter they gave me either option, and I decided to sign the acknowledgement form in order to receive them through the post.

 

Also, to see if they "used" the signature for anything else.

 

This SAR request is now really overdue, yet Lloyds dont seem to care that they are in breech of the Data Protection Act.

 

Are there any requirements that if an account(s) is no longer active, then SAR documents cannot be sent through the post?

 

I've had other defunct accounts sent through the post, so why not this one.

 

I do not want to go to town and collect the parcel, I want it sent through the post.

 

Any advice as to a suitable reply letter?

 

Thanks,

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump.........

 

Is there anything within the Data Protection Act which states that if an account is no longer active, then documents from a SAR request must be collected from a bank branch with some form of ID?

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no but it does happen

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Bump.........

 

Is there anything within the Data Protection Act which states that if an account is no longer active, then documents from a SAR request must be collected from a bank branch with some form of ID?

 

MP.

 

 

Not as far as I am aware

If I have helped you please leave me a message by clicking my star

 

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI

Read Here

3. Reclaim Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial

Read Here

5. Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors?

Read Here

6. Staying Calm About Debt

Read Here

7. Thinking of a Full & Final Settlement?

Read Here

 

How To Upload Documents To Cag

Instructions

 

I DON'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM BUT IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

 

 

 

Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are perhaps inappropriate for posting on the main forum. Site rules explain this in more detail.

 

If you receive a private message which you consider abusive, derogatory or otherwise inappropriate, whether it be about yourself or other members, please report it using the "report" icon

 

If you are approached (or have been approached) by private message with an offer of help "Off Forum" or with a view to asking you to visit another website, please inform the site team via the report icon, especially if this results in a request for a fee. Remember, this is for your own protection

my views are my own and are given in good faith to try and help people. Please seek professional advice on your case if necessary

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies.

 

This whole thing is getting beyond a joke now.

My initial SAR request was sent to LLoyds in December which went missing in the post.

Now this one has gone well past the 40 day mark, yet Lloyds continue to play games.

 

Surely if this was Lloyds policy, then when they asked for my signed authority,

they should have also made it clear then that this was the case.

 

But no, they gave me the option of having it sent to me at home.:???::???:

 

Can I force them to send me through the post?

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure you can force them...they may just carry on playing silly billies.

 

Why not arrange to pop into a branch and get it....might save you a lot of time and grief.

 

As an added extra, lodge a formal compliant with the ICO about it too.

 

i s

If I have helped you please leave me a message by clicking my star

 

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI

Read Here

3. Reclaim Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial

Read Here

5. Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors?

Read Here

6. Staying Calm About Debt

Read Here

7. Thinking of a Full & Final Settlement?

Read Here

 

How To Upload Documents To Cag

Instructions

 

I DON'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM BUT IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

 

 

 

Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are perhaps inappropriate for posting on the main forum. Site rules explain this in more detail.

 

If you receive a private message which you consider abusive, derogatory or otherwise inappropriate, whether it be about yourself or other members, please report it using the "report" icon

 

If you are approached (or have been approached) by private message with an offer of help "Off Forum" or with a view to asking you to visit another website, please inform the site team via the report icon, especially if this results in a request for a fee. Remember, this is for your own protection

my views are my own and are given in good faith to try and help people. Please seek professional advice on your case if necessary

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know where you are coming from. It would be easier just to collect it in branch. It's just the principal of the matter.

 

I've been reading up on ICO complaints. It seems they always try to get you to resolve the dispute with the company first before making an official complaint.........Hmmm LOL

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Well, after many months I finnally have all my SAR documents, all 750 or so pages of it!!!

 

Most interesting reading I must say.

Looks like this account will run into the tens of thousands of ppi refund if I am correct and subsequently successful as the account was started in 1999.

 

It also turns out that they have officially written the account off in October 2011 citing "unenforceable CCA" as the reason.

 

This seems to back up the fact that I haven't heard anything from either LTSB or any DCA this year.

 

So now that question:

 

Do I let sleeping dogs lie or go for the ppi?

 

I've not done any full calculations yet, but I rekon that they owe me at least double the outstanding balance on the account.

 

In another twist, I've also found ppi on a loan I took out in 1998, yet I thought it did not have it attached.

 

Obviously added it without my knowledge! No CCA or anything, just screen printouts from when the loan was approved entitled "fixed term loan with insurance".

 

I feel another letter coming on!!!!!!!!!

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the PPI will all be yours

 

GO GET 'em

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you think the best way to go about this is then?

 

As already stated earlier in the thread,

LTSB have already rejected my initial PPI claim,

as have the FOS,

with the main reason being that the application form stated the ppi was optional.

(Even though I never filled it out, the sales adviser did).

 

Do you think a fresh prelim letter to LTSB along with a SOC, then following up with an LBA?

 

My concern with this is that it will be well over the £5,000 small claims limit, so i'll be liable for costs if I lose.

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Had put this on the back burner due to other commitments, but need some advice here please.

 

I've just received a notice of assignment letter from Lloyds and 1st Credit ltd which states that the account has been "assigned in all of its respective rights, title and interest" to 1st Credit.

 

The letter also includes a standard 1st Credit introduction letter asking for the balance in full etc.

 

Now I know 1st credit can be aggressive as i've had dealings with them in the past, so what is my best option now?

 

The account is still in serious dispute with Lloyds for the ppi and not having a valid cca or original t's and c's, so can they legally sell it on?

 

Also, who do I now chase the ppi for, as the letter seems to state that 1st Credit are responsible for all such enquiries?

 

Thanks in advance,

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope PPI to the OC always

 

your case is rather like another on here a while back.

 

did you tell theses muppets that the sales advisor

filled the form out?

 

as for wetcloths

 

ignore them.

 

tell them gladly see you in court as the balance is all PPI

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Its not Wescott now, they were defeated a while back. 1st Credit have now bought the account according to notice of assignment.

 

Not told them anything about the initial ppi sale yet, only got the letter this morning. Will get an account in dispute letter drafted to them tonight.

 

As for Lloyds and the ppi, given that the FOS rejected my complaint, do I dive straight in and file a Court claim, or do I go down the prelim, LBA then Court route?

 

You dont have a link to the similar case do you? What was the outcome on that one?

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no i cant remmber

 

pers i wouldn't bother keeping up letter tennis now

how many dca's have had it

 

as for the PPI

 

have you got a copy of the agreement?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The account has been passed around 6 DCA's up to now, plus Lloyds internal collections.

Iqor, Wescot, Allied, Robinson Way to name a few.

All returned to Lloyds when I reminded them of the disputes.

 

1st Credit are the only one's to have purchased the account though.

This is the only NoA received so far.

 

I have a copy (poor quality) of the original application form, filled out by their sales advisor,

with me only signing and dating the bottom.

PPI box ticked by the advisor also.

Original terms and conditions were on the reserve,

but are unreadable and missing the key prescribed info.

 

PPI terms and conditions were sent out to me some 4 month after the account started

and after the initial cooling off period without penalty had elasped for cancelling.

I still have the original copy of these from 1999,

but Lloyds no longer have a copy of them. (Or at least they never sent them in the SAR).

 

I argued with the FOS that this also amounted to misselling as I wasn't given all the required info when I signed the agreement,

and wasn't aware that I could actually cancel the ppi.

 

They said that when they eventually arrived I should have realised then,

but TBA I never actually read through them fully with it being so long after the sale.

Plus I wasn't expecting to have been diddled by the bank anyway when they had said the ppi was compulsory,

so never even gave it a thought! Just filed them away.

 

MP.

Edited by makkapakka69
Extra info
Link to post
Share on other sites

right well i'd not bother playing letter tennis with the dca's anymore

prob part why you still get letters...dont pull the dogs' tail...

 

now the PPI.

 

i have one like yours [mine s 26yrs old]

 

whereby under their 'resonable approach' the FOS Omb s says the same thing.

 

how can i possibly remember after 26yrs !!!

 

TBH i fnd that insulting.

 

you CLEARLY remember that the rep ticked the box

you clearly remember not wanting or being told you must have it

or being 'led to believe' you would nt get the credit without it

 

the bottm line here is it was a commission sale by the rep...nice little earner huh!

 

i think it is very poor for the FOS to judge on what p'haps people do/do not remember

 

i's right back

clearly stating the box WAS ticked by the rep

the rep said i must take it out

PROVE otherwise.

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, thanks dx.

 

I'll start drafting up a new letter to LTSB.

Is it wise to include a SOC with the letter or wait for them to reply first?

 

They have only sent statements back from 2000 until default in 2008 with the SAR, but none from 1999.

 

Haven't totting up the amounts yet, but it will be quite a sum with interest on top.

 

Out of interest,

how did your case go, or is it still ongoing?

Did you end up going to court?

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites
As an aside, does a Notice of Assignment need to be sent recorded delivery?

 

MP.

 

no its a worthess bit of paper.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Right, thanks dx.

 

I'll start drafting up a new letter to LTSB.

Is it wise to include a SOC with the letter or wait for them to reply first?

 

They have only sent statements back from 2000 until default in 2008 with the SAR, but none from 1999.

 

Haven't totting up the amounts yet, but it will be quite a sum with interest on top.

 

Out of interest,

how did your case go, or is it still ongoing?

Did you end up going to court?

 

MP.

 

only got my letter thursday after 3yrs of waiting.

 

as for the PPI months you dont know

use an avg of what you do.

 

did you ever send the FOS CQ in?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...