Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”. The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses."    
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
    • The shift to card and contactless technology in the past decade has been rapid - not just in Britain, but in all sorts of remote pockets of the world. This is yet a further sign of it.View the full article
    • We both sent our completed N181 form to the court and claimants solicitors. We haven't received anything from the solicitors yet but perhaps we will today. How are directions agreed ? Does the claimant file proposed directions with their Directions Questionnaire ? I will update once anything is received from the solicitors.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help Please - home repossession in s Ireland to a southern irish bank


jimjim5
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4533 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We had our house repossed in Southern Ireland in 2009 and we moved back to UK. The bank where we had our mortgage has now merged with a UK banking group and we recieved letters from a UK solicitors firm looking for a mortgage shortfall of in excess of 70,000.00.

 

At the moment we are a single income household struggling to make ends meet. I contacted CCCS who gave me letters etc to send them inculding income and expenditure offering 1.00 pm for the time being. they havnt refused this but are looking for really personal information such as employer details.

 

One of the letters is threating to take a UK CCJ out against us for the money. From what I have read here I get the impression that this is something that they cannot do but I do know that there is someway of enforcing the debt here.

 

What steps can they take against us as unless we win the lottery there is now way on earth we can pay this? The firm is definatly a solicitors I havnt seen them listed as a DCA

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have a mortgage here in the UK. I dont know how bankruptcy will affect it. I have looked at the agreements between UK and Ireland but to tell you the truth i dont understand it. It says it can enforce the debt but i also interperet it as that it cannot appear on credit file here in the UK??? Can they get the CCJ here or does it have to be in Ireland. If they get it here it really mucks up any plans we have to hopefully re-mortgage in a few years to try and clear the debt by hopefully getting a settlement on it.

Edited by jimjim5
misspelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

With having a mortgage bankruptcy isn't really an option. You could look into a IVA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individual_Voluntary_Arrangement

It says it can enforce the debt but i also interperet it as that it cannot appear on credit file here in the UK???

If a judgement is made in the UK it will be entered on to your credit file.

Can they get the CCJ here or does it have to be in Ireland.
As i said there are reciprocal agreements within the EU, see http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?250889-Can-I-Be-Sued-For-An-Overseas-Debt
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do the have to give us all the information such as how much the house was sold for. As if the figure is euros, the info isn't very clear so far, it will be about 20, 000 less.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

An Irish bank have filed a county court claim against me for a mortgage shortfall. they have lodged the claim through a court in the uk. they have never pursued this through the irish courts. I rang and checked. Can they legally do this without pursuing a judgement in Ireland first. I have been given confliciting information regarding this

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I just return the forms saying I'm challenging jurisdiction so. Is there anywhere I can get legal help with them.. I can't scan. It just states mortgage shortfall 71,027.48 and partial address of the property. It does not detail anywhere the full address or that its in the roi

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to move your thread into the legal forum to see if the legal wallahs can help.

 

The POC seems to be ambiguous and you should be able to defend on two counts in my opinion, out of jurisdiction an a .'embarrassed defence'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jurisdiction in cross border cases is governed by EU Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, otherwise known as the Brussels Regulation.

 

Normally the usual place of residence of the defendant is the country with jurisdiction to process the case. People who normally reside in a particular Member State must, whatever their nationality, be sued in the courts of that Member State. However, there are exceptions to this so some claims can be brought in another Member State other than where the defendant resides. These exceptions mainly occur in matters relating to -

 

• a contractual obligation;

• actions for damages;

• matters relating to maintenance; and

• matters relating to consumer contracts, insurance and to individual contracts of employment.

• Matters relating to patents and trademarks

• Matters relating to ownership or tenancy of immovable property

 

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/ex725_e.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to go to court re a debt of 70k. I don't know what to do can anyone tell me what happens and what can happen. It's re a house repossession

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a county court case re a mortgage shortfall. We got the papers on Saturday. I have the details in another thread. The debt is from another country but there are pursuing it through the courts here. I don't know what way court works and I don't understand terminology either

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly jimjim, are you able to provide a link to your previous thread with all the details? Can you also advise which country the debt is registered in? Someone who knows more anout these things may be able to advise you in respect of whether a case from another legal jurisdiction can actually be heard in the UK.All the best,CM

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...