Jump to content


Healthcare Private medical Contract Rules


albertjohn
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4441 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We had some private healthcare via an employed status contribution for the whole family and some important and expensive work was authorised for my wife (prior to time when the Company stopped paying for the cover) to be carried out.

 

The Specialist involved has decided that the operation should not take place for a few more weeks and the insurance company is now saying that although it authorised the work in writing because the policy has now ceased she is not covered!!!:mad2:

 

I appreciate it may be in the small print but does this stand up in contract law etc as it is previously authorised complaint not a subsequent or subsequently discovered condition???

 

I believe we can take up the option of continuos cover within 30 days by signing up to a new policy but what about the cover which was in force for 18 months during which time no other claims were made and this claim was wholly authorised?:-o

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the face of it if your wife had valid cover and a medical condition started whilst she had cover she should be treated for it - but it really is a question of reading the terms.

 

If you feel the term is unfar then you may wish to check out the 2 pieces of legislation relating to unfair contract terms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...