Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PPI claim against First national Motor


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4186 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I have recent sent in the following PPI claims on the 8th November

 

PSA Finance

Pendragon

and also one was sent to

First National Motor Finance

 

Of course i am not expected an response straight away but i have got a response from Santander.

 

In their letter to me they confirm that Santander Consumer (UK) ltd is the facility manager for First National Motor Finance which ceased trading in Dec-03. They state on checking their records they can confirm that they have been unable to locate any credit protection insurance or payment protection insurance sold by us. So say they can not take the matter any further but if i have a compliant then go to the financial ombudsman.

 

Please note in the letter to them i enclosed a copy of the agreement i signed back in 1989 which show i have taken out a credit protection insurance this policy lasted for 5 years.

 

I know there is no time limit to claim this money back but what do i do when they say the company ceased trading and i have already provided them with the evidence that the policy was taken out.

 

I may be able to find some really old bankstatements showing this debit but what are my options now do i have to the Ombudsman or can i go back to them. My really concern they got the letter on the 9th and they responded the same day saying no.

 

Any response would be appreciated

 

Thanks.

 

Roe

Link to post
Share on other sites

just a ruse to put you off

 

go get 'em!

 

do an soc and the fos customer questionaire

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dk

Just a bit confused

I understand you say to get a SOC but do you mean a SAR. If you do mean SAR then is this going to be a problem as Santander say the company ceased trading after my loan have been fully paid back.

Also I have already sent them a copy of the loan agreement with the PPI attached so why do I need to do a SAR?

I may be missing the point but I just don’t understand what the SAR is going to say that the loan agreement I have, I can also show a bank statement which shows the debit of the loan plus the PPI, I can also provide a copy of my credit reports going back to 2004 which I think shows the loan (I have this due to ID theft which is a completely different matter).

Surely the loan agreement, plus a copy of the bank statement plus a copy of the credit report is enough evidence to prove the loan and the PPI existed. But is the main issue that the company ceased trading?.

Regards

Roe

Link to post
Share on other sites

soc is shedule of charges [spreadsheet]

and you'll need the FOS customer questionaire from here:

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

might also be an idea to have a read around in my sug etc

 

sant ARE your target

dont get fobbed-off!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Hi Emma

 

My loan was taken out with Lombard who then at the end of the day became First National but my loan was not to do with GE Capital Finance - the address i wrote to was

 

3 Princess Way

Redhill

RH1 1UR

 

but i addressed the letter to first national and i got a response from Santander. However i am not sure this is the address you need. When you do some more digging you will probably come up with the same address but a different post code. Sorry can't be any more help.

 

Regards

 

Roe

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...