Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Below is my proposed letter of claim to Yodel. I would welcome comment.   Dear Yodel, Claimant x: claim for breach of contract loss of package xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I am making a claim against you claim against for breach of contract relating to your loss of a package valued at £150.00. I refer to two webchats that I have had with your organisation following which I was advised that Yodel were not prepared to recompense me for my loss. This letter is being sent to in accordance with the Practice Direction on Pre-action Conduct and Protocols (the Pre-action PD) contained in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR). In particular, I refer you to paragraphs 13 to 16 of the Pre-action PD concerning the court's powers to impose sanctions for failing to comply with its provisions. Ignoring this letter may lead to our my commencing proceedings against you and may increase your liability for costs. Circumstances leading to my claim against Yodel On 14 June 2024, I made a sale on eBay of a set of 3 Kirkland Signature golf wedges (‘the goods’) at a price of £150.00 plus £6.00 postage. I received payment from the purchaser via eBay and on 15 June I purchased postage from eBay’s Packlink. Packlink arranged the delivery of the package to the purchaser with Yodel. Having packaged the goods in wrapping paper, I delivered them on 15 June to the Shell petrol station on ……..and a tracking number of  xxx was given. Tracking showed that the package made it to your Leeds Depot on 15 June but thereafter the package went missing. The Purchaser had been advised that they were ready for collection at her local depot in Preston but they could not be located in Preston. I personally attended your Leeds depot where your helpful staff confirmed that the package had been scanned into that depot and was also scanned going onto one of your trailers (7DL 1436) bound for Preston but that thereafter the package was not scanned again and could not be located either in Leeds or Preston. Due to non-receipt of the goods, I was required to refund the buyer her £156.00. I have sought compensation via Packlink but they are only prepared to pay ‘basic compensation’ of £25.00. Through your webchat I have sought to make a claim against Yodel but have simply been referred back to Packlink suggesting that I do not have any rights against Yodel. You are referred to the The Contract (Rights of Third Parties Act) 1999 upon which I rely and which give me the right to sue on the contract just as if I was a directly contracting partner. I was a discernible beneficiary of the contract entered into by you with Packlink to deliver the package on my behalf. As the sender of the parcel I was somebody who was intended to benefit under the parcel delivery contract. In breach of contract, you failed to exercise reasonable care and skill to deliver the package to the purchaser but instead have lost the package. Given the scanning history of the package, it is likely to have been misappropriated whilst in your custody – a failure to take reasonable care to avoid such misappropriation.   My Claim against Yodel I wish to claim the sum of £150.00 being the value of the goods lost by Yodel   Relevant documents I enclose copies of the following documents that are relevant to this matter: 1.    A screenshot of the eBay sale of the goods and the tracking notes.   Alternative dispute resolution I am prepared to consider ADR.   I  look forward to receiving confirmation that accept liability for these matters, together with a full settlement of my claim, within [21] days of the date of this letter, namely by [DATE].] [In the absence of a full response by that date, I will issue and serve proceedings without further notice. Yours faithfully,    
    • I didn't know I had to go to the US. Were you there recently, TOR? I'm not sure you've been to London recently either. We know some 'average Americans' and I've asked what they think about things today, as it happens.
    • The scammers were posing as young women online to trick people into sending sexually explicit material.View the full article
    • To even ask that question you clearly haven’t visited anywhere in the USA recently The cesspit that is SanFrancisco Venice beach that no one in their right mind would visit  The open drug taking, crime, zombies everywhere (reminds me of Khans London) The Texan border towns flooded with illegals (The sole responsibility of Harris) And that’s before we get onto world matters  One sniff of Harris in the White House  and China will be into Taiwan Endless tax dollars being thrown at Zelenskyy for what reason? To keep killing Ukrainians? The average American hates it  The barmy Biden/Harris rush to net zero  Perhaps as President Trump can knock that lunacy on the head worldwide 
    • Their fees can go up with different stages of enforcement. They will almost certainly have charged the creditor the first stage (compliance) of £90 including VAT. This will be added to your bill though. Then they are allowed to visit with a view to entering into an agreement with you. They may charge £190 plus VAT for this plus 7.5% of anything over the first £1000. A second visit would trigger an additional fee of £495 plus VAT. Finally, they can visit with a view to removing goods for sale. They can charge £525 plus VAT for this visit plus 7.5% of anything over the first £1000. Not sure if these figures match with anything you have. You would need to ask which fees have been added. You shouldn’t have to pay the VAT. Hopefully, it isn’t a major issue given you won’t be dealing with the bailiffs.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

advice please... re claimed debt by Capquest old Next Account


lynd
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3460 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

dear all

 

my lodger was evicted from her mother's home approximately two years ago October time. She left with very little.

 

She's just received a letter from CapQuest saying that they've bought a debt from Next for nearly £2k for non-payment.

She did have an account with Next (and had a storecard) but did not have the card with her when she left her mother's home.

It can only be presumed that her mother has run up debts in daughter's name.

 

The letter is addressed correctly to this address.

She has never had any form of correspondence from Next saying that she owes them money or what has been ordered.

I am presuming that the goods, when delivered to wherever from Next were signed for and that Next have details of this signature,

the goods ordered and what they were.

 

We've emailed the CAB for advice and will contact (is this wise???)

Capquest in the morning stating what (that we're taking legal advice???).

Capquest say they want payment in full by the 13th of November or else they'll take legal action and/or send in baliffs.

 

Now, regarding the baliffs

- the property she lodges in is owned my me.

 

Bar her personal possessions (clothes etc) everything else is owned my me

- the furniture in her room, her bedding etc..

 

am I right in presuming that the baliffs can't take any of that?

I have read that baliffs can't enter the property unless by 'peaceful entry' (i.e. through an unlocked door or open window

- actually if they do that and my dog bites them then what???).

 

. How does this affect my credit rating (which is exceptionally good I may add)

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. She (lodger) is obviously a little shocked that her mother could do this to her.

 

Thanks

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi and welcome

 

DO NOT phone Crapquest or any DCA EVER, keep everything in writing only.

 

Do not worry about their threats,

to appoint bailiffs they would require a court judgement and your lodger is a long way from this stage.

 

I would suggest a 'prove it' letter to Capquest and make it clear that she does not acknowledge this debt and disputes it.

Once you dispute a debt they have to put it on hold and investigate.

 

CAB advice can be less than helpful at times

- they are overstretched and not really prepared to help in disputes,

so see what they say but don't rely on it.

 

Do not do anything else until you have the full facts of this

 

Prove it letter

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?428-General-debt-letter-if-you-know-nothing-of-the-debt

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bailiffs can't/wont' come unless it has been to court, there has been a judgement against her and she has refused/failed to pay by 28 days after the judgment.

 

That's one thing to report as that type of threat is not allowed.

 

I've edited your heading to include Capquest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good, Crapquest are well known for this. Send your letter recorded and keep a copy.

 

It may be worth some enquiries to Next also but see what CQ come back with and don't worry

  • Confused 1

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have sent off the letter to CapQuest.

 

Interestingly enough, talking to lodger, is that she has never taken out a storecard with Next... also CapQuest have tried to call her on a couple of occasions yesterday via her mobile.... makes you wonder where they got the number from?

 

I said, don't reply to them - is this right? They left a voice-message saying get in contact asap and the woman who left the message was a little 'brusque' to say the least!.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, don't speak to them at all, keep everything in writing.

 

It is against Office of Fair Trading Guidelines to phone someone when they have been requested not so send thenm this

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?493-Harassment-by-telephone-response-letter.

 

See what their reply to the 'prove it' letter is, I suspect they are 'phishing' and have not necessarily caught the right person.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that when you do write to them,

make a point of saying that you wish to keep all communication from them in writing only

and that any furhter phone calls or text messages from them will be deemed to be harassment.

 

Point out that under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 that if they make further phone calls or send additional text messgaes,

not only will you inform the police, but you will seek compensation for any distress caused by their harassment.

 

Have a read of the Protection From Harassment Act 1997 - it's brilliant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just an update

- have had a reply from Capquest to say that they are looking into the matter and will be in contact in due course.

 

They have phoned lodger (the last call being on Monday) but nothing since.

 

I've told her not to reply.

 

Will await the next step and may be back for more advice.

 

.. thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll take a wild guess and suggest the letters doesnt say they will send bailiffs straight away, only that they coudl if it coulds to court and there is no payment.

 

If your lodger has not run up the debt and wnast to play ball she will have to report identity theft to the Police. If her mother has comitted fraud then she will have to cop it.

 

If your lodger is denying the debt is theirs then they should write to capquest and tell them so, otherwise you will fidn thigns will just go orudn in circles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll take a wild guess and suggest the letters doesnt say they will send bailiffs straight away, only that they coudl if it coulds to court and there is no payment.

 

If your lodger has not run up the debt and wnast to play ball she will have to report identity theft to the Police. If her mother has comitted fraud then she will have to cop it.

 

If your lodger is denying the debt is theirs then they should write to capquest and tell them so, otherwise you will fidn thigns will just go orudn in circles.

 

I believe they have indicated that this is not their debt and have sent 'prove it' letter

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi people.

 

Lodger has received another letter from CapQuest

 

It says

 

Dear X

 

Our Client: Next

A/c number XXX

Balance XXX

 

We thank you for your correspondence and respond as follows:

 

We can confirm that this account relates to a Next Directory account, opened on 8.8.08.

 

Yours

 

It doesn't give any details of any orders, what was delivered, letters that were sent etc.

 

She wasn't living here then though - didn't move here till 2009.

 

What do you think my (her/our) next move should be?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You require a lot more information than this, you can respond and say that this is still in dispute and you are reporting this matter to OFT. You require proof of liability. Do report this to OFT http://www.oft.gov.uk/contactus

 

You can also enclose a CCA request - this will cost a £1 postal order but should force them to send any agreements and also statements of what is owed

 

 

CCA Request

 

CCA letter to send with a £1 postal order by recorded delivery, do not sign. They have 12 plus 2 working days to reply. If nothing valid is received you can send a letter to put the account in dispute and this should stop them contacting you.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?414-CCA-request-letter

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks.

 

I report them to the OFT saying what exactly

(sorry to be such a doofus - have only ever dealt with TalkTalk and that was a nightmare in itself [but resolved]).

 

I send the CCA letter along with a paragraph saying that this is still in dispute and she needs proof of liability (still not admitting that it's her debt right)?..

 

that letter seems as useful as a chocolate teapot!!

 

And I've dealt with requests (albeit just to supply information) from students and Data Access Request.

 

Most appreciative of all your help here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Report to OFT saying they are not dealing with your dispute properly and providing any information about your liability, which has been requested.

 

Yes sent a CCA request as stated. As part of CCA request they should provide statements of account which will give some idea of where this has originated.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hello again.

 

Continuing the saga we've now had another letter from CapQuest saying that they've frozen the account

whilst they gather the information we requested (they've frozen it for 28 days).

 

Do I let this go as I seem to remember someone saying they've 12 working days plus 2 to supply said information (we're 10 days in now).

 

They've also asked for any paperwork for said debt to be sent to them - which obviously we don't have...

 

Any advice would be more than welcome.

 

Thanks...

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - still send the account in dispute letter after 12 working days, recorded delivery. It is up to them to prove this, not your friend. Let us see what they come back with. Add to the letter that you have no information to support this claim. Did they say exactly what they are asking for?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?436-Failure-to-provide-a-copy-of-the-agreement-within-the-prescribed-timescale

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

The information they've asked for?

 

Any paperwork whatsoever in connection with Next (Bills, Orders blah blah).

 

Now you'd think, considering they're pursuing the said debt, that they would have this information wouldn't you.

 

Lodger has absolutely nothing whatsoever.

 

So, the next step is to send them, after 12 working days, that particular letter? Will get it ready to sign for next week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are asking for you to send paperwork to them, that suggests they are trying to cobble together proof that you have ( and have used ) the account possibly in the abcense of a valid cca. Don't send them anything.

 

I say "You" but I mean your lodger:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

hello there again...

 

I last came on this site nearly 2 years to the day to deal with the above

 

The DCA we were dealing with then was CapQuest who never came back with any of the information required

- and you were all very helpful..

 

Today, lodger received another letter from Next to say that they've passed the debt on to Lowell Portfolio 1 ltd..

 

. any ideas of what to do?

 

Lowell haven't written to her yet but am sure they will

- do I just go through the same thing again???

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have received the notificiation from Lowells about the 'debt'.

 

Quick question. Next sold the debt to CapQuest.

 

It now says that Next has sold the debt to Lowells.

 

How can they sell it twice?

 

Lodger (who has now been promoted to spare daughter) is a little worried again.

 

Do I send the CCA letter off now - the prove it letter?

 

Tis a real pain in the butt to go through this again

- CapQuest last wrote to lodger in December 2011 and have heard absolutely nowt since..

 

. they never supplied the CCA documentation (as I think they didn't have any)

so why did Lowells buy a debt that doesn't seem to be able to be proved?

(or do they just bulk buy?).

 

many thanks indeed for all your help

- you were very very useful before with CapQuest and I hope I can rely on your help again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...