Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, await the Directions Questionnaire from the court. No, the Directions Questionnaire is just a short form and leads to the case being transferred from MCOL/CCBC to your local court.  If you Google "Form N180" you can see a blank copy on government web pages.
    • There will only be one hearing (typo possibly 25th is a Saturday Courts closed ) clarify with the court.
    • Upload a redacted copy of their statement (+ Exhibits) please.
    • No Andy, I'll scan, redact and upload later today. So the court sent me 2 letters, same envelope and stapled together but with different dates!. 1. N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, stating: UPON considering the papers herein IT IS ORDERED THAT The claim is listed for an attended hearing 25 May....... at which court will consider allocation..  etc   2. N24 Notice of PTR/Adjnd/Restored/Hrg/Management conference TAKE NOTICE that the hearing will take place on 24 May at....... When you should attend 30 minutes has been allowed for the Hearing   No other instructions anywhere in the envelope or on the letters. Do I attend both?
    • Then leave it just proceed with the claim( strike out/SJ application are risky).....the defendant will not be permitted to rely on written evidence (documented) only verbally as they failed to comply with the N157 (unless they have filed with the court and failed to serve you a copy) ?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MNBA Help Please


Claire Marshall
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4529 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you flowerchild you have been brilliant.

 

I do have a Halifax Credit Card I took out in 2006 which am having that looked at.

 

Do you think its a good idea to do a balance transfer from MBNA onto Halifax!!

 

That would be your decision, it would be against the rules of this forum to advise someone to transfer a balance with the intention of defaulting it, if you see what I mean...

 

Apart from that, there's no guarantee the Halifax 2006 will be unenforceable, not everything pre-2007 is! The only way to find out is to go through the documents, with older accounts or those that have been sold several times there's always a chance they may not have an agreement but not very likely to be the case with a 2006 account!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I finally received a so called "copy of executed agreement" from mbna.

 

I am confused at this because of the following:-

 

a: Copy is of executed agreement taken out in 2009, this has been electronically signed, but not signed manually i.e. My signature is not present

 

b: A second agreement has been given to me with my new address, this agreement is unsigned and has not been electronically signed either

 

also on the second agreement there appears to be no signature box either.

 

I am confused with mbna how can they provide me with a second agreement when i have not signed it with my new address??

 

Is this legal - very confused??

 

Please help!!??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claire you have been asked before to stick to one thread for one issue. It makes advising you extremely difficult.

 

All your MBNA threads have now been merged into one. You can find your threads easy enough by clicking on "UserCP" at the top of the screen.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I finally received a so called "copy of executed agreement" from mbna.

 

I am confused at this because of the following:-

 

a: Copy is of executed agreement taken out in 2009, this has been electronically signed, but not signed manually i.e. My signature is not present

 

b: A second agreement has been given to me with my new address, this agreement is unsigned and has not been electronically signed either

 

also on the second agreement there appears to be no signature box either.

 

I am confused with mbna how can they provide me with a second agreement when i have not signed it with my new address??

 

Is this legal - very confused??

 

Please help!!??

 

Claire,

 

Unfortunately the answers you'll get may not always be what you'd like to hear! The answer to your query was not my personal point of view but a statement of the facts as they are and you can do your own research and will find nothing different.

 

In a nutshell: if your card was taken out in 2009 you can't really use unenforceability in your favour. I would like to be able to tell you otherwise as I myself have an unenforceable MBNA CC so I can understand why you would like to take this route but it won't work in your case because your account is just too recent!

 

You should also be aware that The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Electronic Communications) Order 2004 states that ticking the box is the equivalent of a signature for online applications made after 2004. The document is here: http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?LegType=All+Legislation&title=Consumer+Credit&searchEnacted=0&extentMatchOnly=0&confersPower=0&blanketAmendment=0&sortAlpha=0&TYPE=QS&PageNumber=1&NavFrom=0&parentActiveTextDocId=996470&ActiveTextDocId=996470&filesize=59499

 

Hope that clarifies matters for you!

 

You will notice that not everybody gets taken to court for unpaid debts, however, should MBNA or a DCA start court action, you will not have a defense based on the issues you've posted. Everyone (including OCs and DCAs) knows about the changes to the CCA enacted in April 2007 and will use the age of your account to their advantage.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you sweetie advice taken and understood.

 

I do have a Halifax credit card which I took out in September 2006, which is currently being looked into so hopefully that one will be unenforceable!!

 

I might just write to MBNA and ask them to stop adding the interest so that I can pay the balance only; see how they respond.

 

If they dont then I can just do a balance transfer onto another card and avoid interest that way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see how you feel about MBNA and their obscene interest, that's what made me default in the first place as suddenly the balance was going UP despite keeping up payments every month :frusty: - the balance went over the limit because of their interest hike in 2009 and there was PPI on top! They also charged overlimit charges but I only went over limit because of THEM! I wrote to them and they came back with a load of poo so I just stopped paying them almost 2 years ago! :mad2: :mad2:

 

MBNA ****ed me off soooo much I was even looking into a CMC like you (CCK in my case, ouch! :embarassed::oops:) just to get back at the b******s, I couldn't believe that, while the BoE dropped the base rate to nearly zero to stimulate the economy, these sharks were using the opportunity to line their pockets, knowing balance transfers were few & far between at the time! I was unemployed and most of my savings went down the drains just to keep up with payments, only to be swallowed up by their interest & charges! :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2:

 

So I haven't paid them a penny for two years and the account is UE as they have no trace of a CCA, they have admitted as much in writing... :whoo:

 

So you see I fully understand your frustration with them, it's a shame UE doesn't apply to newer accounts as the Powers That Be decided to side with the banks when they passed the new CCA in 2006, knowing how useless and inefficient financial institutions were, they decided to repeal the section that made it possible to challenge their agreements... :-x

 

Yes, you should consider a balance transfer if you have the option, why line the pockets of MBNA? :?:

 

Best of luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, hope you are well.

 

Just received an interesting letter from MBNA

 

Considering my account is in dispute over a non executed agreement, the greedy buggers have sent me a ltter about raising my interest rate from 15.9% to 24.9%

 

Aren't they greedy sods, even the rate of inflation aint 9%!!

 

How can they get away with this!!

 

I have sent them a letter about it objecting to the increasing as it will make the debt worse!!

 

Anyone else got this problems with MBNA!!??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you rebel, I have sent them another letter saying account is in dispute.

 

I also telephoned the Financial Ombudsman Service to tell them and they are not happy with it either.

 

I have told MBNA that if they increase my rates I will go bankrupt as they are putting too much financial strain on me by upping my rates by 9%!!

 

Hopefuly this might do the trick!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...