Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Consumer loans ppi -Claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3918 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A few months ago ;

we made a claim against Consumer Loans for PPI on a secured loan provided ; the Consumer Loans Ltd ;

 

the Loan Company our rejected the claim grounds that the time limit has expired ;

we therefore approached the Ombudsman for redress;

We have just received a response from the Ombudsman that it can not pursue our claim grounds that my claim has expired;

but then will investigate concerns with the insurance company who actually provided the cover.

 

The facts are that Consumer loans provided us with insurance cover for five years of the secured loan;

but then after the end of the 5 years kept on collecting the insurance premuims for another 10 years until the secured loan was paid off.

 

We are unhappy about the ombudsman position and also the fact that despite the fact Consumer loans did not offer cover kept on collecting premiums on the secured loan:mad2:

 

Any suggestions on how to proceed with the Ombudsman

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few months ago ; we made a claim against Consumer Loans for PPI on a secured loan provided ; the Consumer Loans Ltd ; the Loan Company our rejected the claim grounds that the time limit has expired ;

 

What time limit?

 

we therefore approached the Ombudsman for redress; We have just received a response from the Ombudsman that it can not pursue our claim grounds that my claim has expired;

 

Expired in what way?

but then will investigate concerns with the insurance company who actually provided the cover. The facts are that Consumer loans provided us with insurance cover for five years of the secured loan; but then after the end of the 5 years kept on collecting the insurance premuims for another 10 years until the secured loan was paid off. We are unhappy about the ombudsman position and also the fact that despite the fact Consumer loans did not offer cover kept on collecting premiums on the secured loan:mad2:

 

This would have been a single premium ppi policy most likeley. So they haven't actually taken premiums from you....they actually loaned you the money to pay a single premium and spreadit over the lifetime of the loan agreement.

 

Any suggestions on how to proceed with the Ombudsman

 

What did they say they are going to do (if anything)?

 

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mariander; Thanks for your response. This is the contents of their letter as quoted dated 3/11/11-

' Having looked into this case in more detail ;

I sorry that we are unable to investigate the complaint about the seller.

This is because the event you have complained about the sale of your payment protection insurance policy took place on a date

before the sale of insurance policies by this business became covered by our jurisdiction.

 

We are ;however investigating the possibilty of raising these concerns with the under writer of the policy (that the isurance company who actually provovided the cover under the policy)'

 

They indicate they are not even quite sure whether the insurance company will accept liability but will keep in touch with me again.

 

Do you think we should continue to pursue this claim to the next stage -the assessor or simply wait for their comments.

Thanks

knight templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats a std response from the FOS when they get told by the OC - not us mate go away

and the FOS agree with them.

 

you'll sadly get nowhere now with the fos.

 

what kind of figures are we looking at here and how old is the A/C

 

please give us the details of your claim..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mariander;

Thanks for your response;

 

we have not received a final response from the ombudsman as yet ;

 

except a letter as copied ;

 

we shall wait till they write regarding the contacts with the insurance company regarding

acceptance of liability which I think may be doubtful ;in response to dx100uk;

 

the amount involved is £9,075 inclusive of £825.00( PP Insurance policy)

 

knight templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi Cags'

 

Submitted a PPI claim againnst Consumer loans for about two years now;

 

all I get are these endless letters from the FOS reminding me or assuring me that the claim

are being still been investigated by the FOS;

 

is this another ploy by the Consumer Loans and what shall I do ;

 

can I complain to the FOS for such delays to the response to my claims.

 

knights templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

claims should always be directed at the original creditor first off

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you a thread already running?

 

no good asking one line questions when you don't tell us the full story................

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx; no thread on this issue on this thread ;

details as follows ;

 

made a claim for a PPI refund to consumer loans ltd the original creditors via an agent called Express Loans and Mortagges f

 

rom what I understand this company has ceased trading ;

 

the loan was a secured loan on our property of high rise council flat ;

 

PPI taken out on loan ; l

 

oan paid off as a result of sale of property ;

 

made a claim for PPI ;

 

liability rejected by original lender;

 

thus seeking to know whether original lender is correct in repudiating liability

as agent made the application and accepted with PPI payments .

 

Knights templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan up the refusal letter.

 

if le&m are no more try the fscs.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

was this under £25k and a signed consumer credit agreement

 

if so you need to retort with section 56 of the CCA.

 

Consumer Credit Act Section 56. refers...

— (1) In this Act “antecedent negotiations ” means any negotiations with the debtor or hirer—

(a) conducted by the creditor or owner in relation to the making of any regulated agreement, or

(b) conducted by a credit-broker in relation to goods sold or proposed to be sold by the credit-broker to the creditor before forming the subject-matter of a debtor-creditor-supplier agreement within section 12(a), or

© conducted by the supplier in relation to a transaction financed or proposed to be financed by a debtor-creditor-supplier agreement and “negotiator ” means the person by whom negotiations are so conducted with the debtor or hirer.

 

.............

 

(2) The effect of section 56 is to makes the finance company liable for what you were told by the salesperson who negotiated the contract. But it will not help you demonstrate that what the salesperson said creates liability. I think you need to add an allegation that the salesperson misrepresented the terms of the insurance contract and that you relied on that misrepresentation.

This will already be implicit from you should say about being told the PPI was mandatory but best to state it expressly.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx; Perfect response ;

 

Yes the amount of the loan was for £9075 and there was a signed consumer credit agreement

between ourselves and the original creditor ;

 

but not quite sure what le&m and fscs means sorry for the ignorance ; can you please HELP .

 

Thanks

Knights Templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

legal express.......

 

FSCS are the people that cough up when firms that go bust charged PPI.

 

you need to read around the forum

 

and send a letter of reply clearly rejectingtheir attempt to palm you off

 

however we need the background please

 

HOW did you complain?

 

did you use the FOS questionnaire?

 

did you do a spreadsheet?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx; Thanks for your response;

 

YES did inform FOS and completed application form ;

an officer rings on Tuesday to say it will be difficult to resolve

because their problem is that application was made through an agent

or third party but will in get in touch with Consumer loans Ltd but we did not submit any spreadsheet for our claim .

 

Rung FSCS this afternoon soon after your response;

to inquire whether an application would be considered ;

was told by officer on phone that since our claim or insurance policy of PPI was issued in 1990

it is not likely they will entertain my claim ;

are they correct or it is another poly to FOB us Off as usual ;

 

this is really disappointing ;

 

sorry to bother you again .

 

Thanks

 

Knights Templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

the issue with PPI if that era is WHOM were they responsible too?

 

not sure what 'rules/guidelines' were in place by whom in 1990

 

there was the GISC code on PPI and another one [AES? ] before that.

 

I can see the issue.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx ; Thanks for clarification and doubts but is there any where I can get publication of the GISC code and AES code and regulations as it pertains to PPI to read or do you think we would be wasting our time and efforts and therefore should just back down from our claim .

 

Thanks

knights templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is a self help site too.............

 

type in GISC in a search engine and read...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx ; Thanks for your help ;

 

 

we realise the forum is self -help but as it is said ' for lack of knowlegde my people perish'

 

at least you have taken the trouble to guide us ;

 

we shall read through the relevant guidelines .- GOOD WEEKEND !!!!!

 

Thanks

Knights templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...