Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Not prosecuting in the public interest seems to be bandied about on forums frequented by students. I don't think I've ever seen a prosecution not go ahead because of that. You would have to define why it isn't in the public interest to prosecute someone who isn't paying their way and is costing other travellers more. I can't think of a reason. HB
    • we have known for a very very long time that 9/10 the OC never knows IRRWW are chasing debtors nor  in some cases even taking money from them that the OC never ever see!! IDRWW pockets it -  free money - lets all go on a staff holiday. there was an article some years back whereby that quoted some +£4M debtors had paid to IDRWW on UAE debts that when contacted the originating banks knew nothing about....😎  
    • let the ombudsman do their job. you'll win handsdown you dont obv owe OVO p'haps anything at all.  dont worry about Past Due credit or any other DCA ( THEY ARE NOT BAILIFFS!) as for you being added to the debt, thats quite OK, you were a resident adult and equally liable under law. once you start getting things moving via the  ombudsman dont forget to get your credit files cleansed of any negative data & seek compensation for distress etc, again the  ombudsman should sort both out for you. as you are now NOT a customer of OVO, there is very very little they can do to you now.  
    • A question - did you use the supermarket or the restaurant? I see the restrictions are different. Sign.pdf
    • DN is ok DCA NOA is ok, though not one from Newday saying they've sold it. agreement states esigned on a sunday at 11am?? really??  but no typed names or tick box nor any IP address used. if the date is correct then poss ok, it that your correct address for that time of take out? but if not, then that could simply be a copy of someone elses they've used with you details copy'n'pasted over theirs. the agreement details separate T&C's in at least 8.4. a full set of T&C containing your correct address for the time MUST be included. failure renders the agreement unenforceable... have you the T&C's too? dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DCA harassment for my deceased Grandfather...please help


Lisey Loo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4548 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, not sure if this is in the right place so please move it if need be.

 

My Grandfather died in August 2010 and ever since then I have had endless letters and calls to my mobile regarding a debt he apparently owes to Phillips & Cohen. They are making me ill.

 

As he & my Grandmother were never in debt ever in their lives & didn`t even have a credit card as they were `old school` & believed in saving for what you wanted, this matter is making me go crazy. They never bought anything with credit always cash from a shop.

 

They have continued to call & send the letters to me after I have sent a copy of his death certificate and several letters to them asking them to stop but they refuse to acknowledge that his has died and want the money from his estate, I think it`s £200 now. We could barely afford his funeral & had to get help from the DWP to pay as he`d been ill with cancer for many years and had strokes/TIAs since 1998.

 

All I can possibly even connect this to is an order I made online for him several years ago for some trousers which I paid for online with my credit card. As the order was going directly to him, I gave his address for delivery.

 

If anyone can help put a stop to this I will be forever grateful. I`m getting calls from 8am every day until 9pm and every letter with his name on asking for money upsets me all over again. They have his first name wrong and are addressing him by his middle name.

 

How can I get them to stop?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your quick reply.

 

I should`ve said that I contacted them last year & the only advice they gave was to write to the DCA with a copy of the death cert & they were convinced that would put a stop to it all.

It made no difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this Phillips & Cohen all the time

or is any other company chasing.

 

Brig.

  • Confused 1

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are committing an offence under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and I would use that act against them and also claim compensation. As it is a criminal offence you can involve the police and they are obliged to act on your complaint.

Alternatively as you have already sent them a letter, send them another letter registered mail advising that if they contact you or your family again you will escalating the matter and seeking compensation through the courts for undue harassment under the Harassment Act or something along those lines.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I`ve tried telling them that what they`re doing is harassment but they carry on. I wasn`t aware of the actual act though, thank you for that.

They were sending all the letters to my Nan`s address and I could see how much it was upsetting her so when I wrote to them telling them to stop and that he`d never bought anything ever from the internet I gave them my address to shield her from it all.

 

I hate them so much!! It feels like they are tarnishing his memory by accusing him of all this cr*p and lying all the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lisey, The way to go from here is to make a Formal Complaint

with a time limit of 7 days for a reply.

I would suggest that you say something like this.

Dear Sirs,

FORMAL COMPLAINT

 

Take note Mr.xxxxxx died on xxxxxxx copy of death certificate attached herewith.

The estate has been settled and there are no funds remaining,you will therefore

remove all data relating to this matter from your files forthwith, failure to do so

WILL result in action against your firm for harassment, and the OFT will be advised

of your conduct as will Consumer Direct.

I am sure I do not have to point out to you the relevent sections of the OFT Guidance 2003-2011

or the Harrasment Act (S).

This my bfinal response to you on this matter as the is no possible resolution to your claim.

send the recorded delivery addressed to the Compliance Manager.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy to help Lisey let us know what

happens, there's more in the armoury

if needed.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget to add

 

and a complaint will be made to the Solicitors Regulatory Authority as your governing body.

 

The SRA won't do much but they are starting to clamp down on the 'solicitors for rent' who are specialising ONLY in debt collecting, deceased debt collecting has a lot of rules and this lot are taking the proverbial.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...