Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
    • Doubt the uneconomic write off would be registered, unless you agreed to accept write off settlement of the claim. It is just cosmetic damage. All that has happened, is that the car has been looked at and they realised the repair costs are going to exceed the value of the car. If the car is perfectly driveable with no upcoming normal work required to pass next MOT, your current Insurers will continue Insurance and you can accept an amount from third party Insurers to go towards you repairing the scratched bodywork.    
    • Peter McCormack says the huge investment by the twins will help Real Bedford build a new ground.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap1 & CCA return


tamadus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4924 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Bad manager!

 

Is such an agreement enforceable. any advice from anyone.

 

It would be wise to start your own Thread in the following CAG Forum:

 

Halifax Bank and Bank of Scotland

 

This is just to allow you to get dedicated help.

 

This Thread is so large now, that your plea for help will soon get lost here.

 

As Foolishgirl has said, if you can Post up a copy (with Private details hidden), then people can advise.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Have been looking for into something but can't seem to find a definitve answer. On a loan agreement does it have to show the 'interest rate charged' or is the APR shown on its own sufficient for it to comply with the regulations. Any thoughts appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that PT it only shows the APR and makes no mention of rate of interest anywhere. It is a loan agreement regulated by CCA 74 so therefore should show it as aprescribedd term

if its a loan then its not necessarily a prescribed term to have the rate of interest

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read the informative link that Car kindly supplied and that seems pretty clear that all agreements post 2000 should include 'an interest rate to be charged'. Therefore in what case on a loan agreement that is regulated by the CCA 74 is it not required?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read the informative link that Car kindly supplied and that seems pretty clear that all agreements post 2000 should include 'an interest rate to be charged'. Therefore in what case on a loan agreement that is regulated by the CCA 74 is it not required?

 

the point is that for a loan agreement, the rate of interest to be charged to the credit is not a prescribed term, well in most cases anyway,

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the risk of going back over old ground, it has been asserted to Mrs VS that "Regulations" (not further specified) permit the provision of either a copy of the original agreement and all subsequent variations or an up to date version consolidating all variations.

 

That was not my understanding. Can anyone shed any light on this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had not been able to find the complete text of the 1983 Regs previously but a bit of prodding has unearthed zootscoot's very helpful uploads.

 

Reg 7(1) does not quite say what it was asserted that "Regulations" (not further specified) say but it could be construed to confirm that s78 is indeed satisfied by the provision of a copy of current Ts&Cs.

 

Reg 7 reads as follows:

 

7 Copies of agreements or security instruments where the agreement or security instrument has been varied

 

(1) Where an agreement has been varied in accordance with section 82(1) of the Act, every copy of the executed agreement given to a debtor, hirer or surety under any provision of the Act other than section 85(1) shall include either--

(a) an easily legible copy of the latest notice of variation given in accordance with section 82(1) of the Act relating to each discrete term of the agreement which has been varied; or

(b) an easily legible statement of the terms of the agreement as varied in accordance with section 82(1) of the Act.

 

Does the fact that reg 7(1) uses the term "include" mean that s78 is satisfied by the provision of the current Ts&Cs without anything further or is it possible to contend that what must be provided is both a true copy of the original version of the agreement as executed AND a copy of the up to date version?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 78 can be satisfied by a copy of the up-to-date terms (prescribed terms).

 

What people need to realise is that s78 has nothing to do with enforceability - it is merely a provision to allow a debtor to find out what terms govern the credit. Enforceabilty is covered by sections:

 

61 (properly executed agreements are enforceable),

 

65 (agreements not properly executed an only be enforced by a court) and

 

127(3) (agreements not properly executed can only be enforced if they have the debtors signature and prescribed terms in the same document)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have recieved a letter from HSBC in reply to a s78 letter.

Reg 3(2) of the Consumer credit ( Cancellation Notices and Copies od documents) 1983 allows that certain items may be omitted from such copies including the signature box & signature.

 

Therefore the copy of the executed agreement we must supply is a copy but need not be a photocopy of the original agreement. Reg 7 of those regulations also requires us to provide a copy of the executed agreeement which there is with your agreement and that power has been exercised to vary the agreememtn which, again is the case with your agreement.

 

They have not sent a copy of the original jusrt a copy of what I would have signed at the time.

Is this correct? If not, how do I reply to them?

Many Thanks

Odio los bancos con una venganza

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a variant on what I described above in relation to MBNA and Mrs VS. I've not been around for long enough to know whether this is a new trend or old news.

 

The 1983 Regs do sort of say what HSBC say they say but I am not sure that HSBC have applied them correctly.

 

They are indeed not obliged to provide a photocopy, provided that it is a true copy - in other words, it must accurately set out what the agreement you signed did say and it cannot be a "conjectured reconstruction" based on what they are simply asserting is what you would have signed at the time.

 

Had they sent you a copy of the current Ts&Cs, they would have - sadly, as I have come to the conclusion recently - complied by being able to rely on regulation 7.

 

By sending you what they have done, it is more questionable as to whether they have complied or not. I think they haven't. But others with more experience and a better feel for these things than I have may want to comment too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the deal is that a 'true copy' is all fine and dandy for a request for a CCA, but they would have a hard job enforcing in court without the original signed copy.;)

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the deal is that a 'true copy' is all fine and dandy for a request for a CCA, but they would have a hard job enforcing in court without the original signed copy.;)

 

 

 

Yes, this is my understanding as well!!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Date

ADDRESS

Dear Sirs

Account Reference Number : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

With reference to the above account, I would be grateful if you would send me a true copy of the original Credit Agreement.

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77-79), I am entitled to receive a copy of my Credit Agreement on request. I enclose a payment of £1.00 which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act and understand a copy of my Credit Agreement should be supplied within 12 working days.

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the Agreement under these sections of the Act.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

Yours faithfully

J Writeoffmedebt

Mrs J Writeoffmedebt

(electronically signed)

enc

This is what I sent Tow .. it might need a bit of updating but 3 points to remember are 1) remember to send £1 cheque, 2) DON'T sign it - use a fancy font and 3) send it recorded (or 'signed for' - whatever they call it these days).

 

Hope this helps

 

jax

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4924 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...