Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Robinson Way won't provide Notice of Assignment

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4639 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Robinson Way are chasing me for an old HSBC overdraft (last payment made in 2008) and won't provide me with a Notice of Assignment from either HSBC or previous DCA that I dealt with. I have requested it four times now and they just sent me a letter from themselves. I replied saying it wasn't the correct documentation. They just ignored my comments and said they were satisfied of my liability for the debt and that I should contact them within 14 days to arrange payment.


They have as yet still failed to prove they have any legal right to act on this account. My understanding is that they would need an Assignment to pursue this through the courts. Does a CCA letter mean they would have to send me the assignment or this not valid for overdrafts?


Any help much appreciated.

Edited by teaandtoast
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi A letter of Assignment only determines who owns the debt,if this is Robinson Way then they need to provide the Assignment.


Did the previous DCA own the debt? and Robinson W are just acting for the debt owner.?


CCA for a Bank overdraft will not work.


You could write to HSBC and ask for a letter of Assignment ,this will then tell you who owns the debt.



Link to post
Share on other sites

Previous DCA was 'Central Debt Enforcement Agency' (who I think were part of Metropolitan) acting on behalf of HSBC. Was paying them and to the best of my knowledge the debt was cleared in full according to my payment plan.


I requested full statements of account from Robinson and they provided me with a printout from them showing last six months of payments to them. I have repeatedly asked them to confirm from whom and when they took over this debt, as well as a Notice of Assignment, but they will not tell me anything. Surely it is their legal responsibility to provide me with proof that they have a right to act on this debt and to provide me with the NOA as requested?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Yes the Central Debt Enforcement Agency (Worthing) are linked to Metropolitan owned by HSBC


I think Robinsonway are just acting for Central Debt E A and that is why you are not getting a Letter of Assignment.


Write to HSBC and ask if they have in fact sold the debt,or go for SAR which should produce all the Data regarding this account including a NOA if applicable.


I would save the £10 and ask HSBC the direct question.



Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this. I knew the SAR was an option but as you say it costs £10. The debt is only £30. I am considering making them an offer of £10 just to p*** off.


Will write to HSBC first though. I don't see why I should make it easy on them which is why I am pushing the fact that they should be sending me a NOA or at least telling me when they took over the debt and from whom...

Link to post
Share on other sites

£30? If you do actually owe it (and I mean you actually used the overdraft, not a legal argument) and can afford it, why don't you send a cheque to HSBC and forget about it as it does seem like a lot of hassle for a relatively small amount.


Also this method bypasses Robinson Way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As this is an overdraft and £30 only I would

try the offer of £10.00 in Full and Final Settlement,

but please remember that must agree to the F&F

if you just send the £10, they will allocate it to the

debt then chase for the balance of £20.



Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I thought I had paid the full amount off, but Robinson claim otherwise. If I can send the money direct to HSBC and those muppets at Robbers Way won't see a penny then I will do that. I'll write to HSBC first and clarify who owns the debt etc and take it from there...


Also, the amount is not really the point, these companies need to realise that they have to operate within the law and consumers have legal rights. They can't just harass people for payment without proving they have a legal right to act on an account, and I think it perfectly reasonable to expect them to do that.



Edited by teaandtoast
Link to post
Share on other sites

The time & trouble is going to cost far

more the £10.00 especially if a SAR is

required £10 + Recorded post, just not

worth the time or the money.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...