Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Okay so potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
    • Currently - "the maximum daily price at 100p / kWh for electricity and 30p / kWh for gas – keep in mind that's a lot higher than the Ofgem Energy Price Cap, so if you can't afford prices to increase further, you're probably better off sticking with a protected tariff such as Flexible Octopus." Octopus Tracker is a product of our labs, available now to customers through our beta programme. Octopus Tracker is a beta product. Some things may not work the first time, and installations and processes may take longer than we'd like. Third party tech like In-home Displays won't always work, and on occasion data issues with smart meters can take significant time to fix or prevent things from working at all.   Copied straight from octopus   Feel free to shove it somewhere else    
    • depends what the fees are, typically nothing can be added once judgement is passed bar litigation costs. on document retention time limits etc at least 6yrs previous must be held though many hold complete info. as for acronyms and abbreviations ideally yes they should     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

5 payday loans, and im now out of work on benefits. -


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4543 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I think that was from my complaint i made about minicredit, this is another response ive just had from them (this is most likely the CFO cpmplaint)

 

Dear Mr Daniels

 

Thank you for your enquiry to Consumer Direct dated 03/11/2011. Your reference number for this case is NW 4462437 and should be quoted in all further correspondence regarding this case.

 

From your email it appears that a loan you took out is increasing and you would like to establish your rights.

 

The key legal points in response to your enquiry are as follows:

 

Generally, when a consumer has signed a contract or agreement it is deemed that they have read, understood and agreed to the terms and conditions of that contract, even if they haven't. However, a consumer can look to make a claim under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 if they feel any term and condition is unreasonable or unclear.

 

The Consumer Protection Regulations 2008 makes it an offence for a trader to harass the other with demands for payment which by their frequency, or the manner or occasion of their making, or any accompanying threat or publicity are calculated to subject him or his family or household to alarm, distress or humiliation.

 

For debt advice, you should contact National Debtline on 0808 808 4000. This is a national telephone helpline for people with debt problems in England, Wales and Scotland. The specialist advice given over the telephone is backed up with written self-help materials and they can assist in setting up Debt Management Plans. The service is free, confidential and independent.

 

Alternatively, you may want to contact the Consumer Credit Counselling Service as they also offer independent advice on debt. You can contact them on 0800 138 1111.

 

As the trader may have breached consumer protection legislation, the information you have provided will be passed to Trading Standards for their consideration. While individual complaints do not necessarily lead to immediate enforcement action, the information is valuable intelligence allowing Trading Standards to properly prioritize their activities. Trading Standards will only contact you if they require further information.

 

Please note: We here at Consumer Direct will always endeavour to give our best legal and practical advice, but in the end it is only the courts that can decide what your rights are and if the company/trader won’t give you what you feel you are entitled to, the only way to enforce your rights would be through the courts (although this is rarely necessary).

 

If you do not receive a satisfactory response or you require any further advice or information about this case, please do not hesitate to contact Consumer Direct on 08454 04 05 06 quoting the case reference number.

 

Thank you for your enquiry

 

Yours Sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep pretty much same response either way - you have the option to persue them in a court to but remember you'd have to fund the claim first Good luck with Trading StandardsSorry don't know much about Mini Credit apart from I'd class them both in the same boat as to their level of handling debtors.

Happy to share my experience but for your own protection, please check and double check what myself and other Caggers inform

...

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence.”

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats good stick to your guns and stay strongAs your out of work they are only entitled to £1 too - I had seen that whilst I've been reading up x

Happy to share my experience but for your own protection, please check and double check what myself and other Caggers inform

...

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence.”

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My girlfriend also took a loan out with minicredit for £150 which was due to be paid on 28/09/2011. She also was not able to pay the full balance, and went through the stages of asking to set up repayment plan etc. The balance is now £724. She has had a letter from them about the doorstep collector also.

 

I think at the end of this week she is able to offer a settlement figure. How much should she offer?

 

The loan plus 1 months interest would equal £187.50 but i just can't see them accepting this offer. The new balance is disgusting. I mean its only 5 weeks or so past its original due date! This company needs to be shut down rapid!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres a breakdown of teh charges on my minicredit loan. End of the month im going to pay them 350 and say take it or leave it as its more than the loan plus 1 months interest. If i then start receiving letters from their solicitor then i would appreciate help from experienced members on here.

 

Loan principal £250

Interest in total £190 (1% of the Principal per day)

Overdue penalty £25 (was added on the 1st day overdue)

Overdue penalty £55 (was added on the 3rd day overdue)

Debit Attempt fees in total £320 (every unsuccessful attempt to receive the repayment costs up to £5)

Debt Recovery fee £100 (was added on the 30th day overdue)

Link to post
Share on other sites

here some advice on this matter

1. go to the police and report the matter to them stealing money is against the law.

2. get a crime reference from your local police

3. report them fraud action group

4. report them to loan sharks call 0300 555 2222

text LOAN SHARK and the details you want to pass on to 60003

send an email to reportaloanshark@stoploan sharks.gov.uk

Iaintw is a registered customer services official/profit Protection staff/supermarket worker and who deals with customers

Buying laptops with advice etc

ISP Moderator and chat room helper for chats

Aviationist and train advice

Credit references and bank helper advice

Loss Protection (civil recovery)

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE

 

Cash Genie, Txtloan, and PaydayUk have all agreed my payments offers of £15 per month until my circumstances change. Txtloan also took off £50 of charges so the balance now stands at £336.

 

So its clear that the 2 remaining payday companies i have loans with, minicredit and capital finance one are the 2 hardest to deal with. They both won't accept repayment plans, they both add huge amounts of interest and charges to loans. I believe capital finance one have broken OFT guidelines by taking money out of my bank on a none agreed date and for a sum of their choice. So i now owe them nothing right?

 

Also have minicredit breached OFT guidelines in anyway? If so how? excessive charges can this be classed is breaking the guidelines?

 

 

Im happy (as i can be) with the results so far, just need to deal with these 2 loansharks.

 

ps. Just rang minicredit to see what they would settle my loan at, the loan is now on £955 (original loan £250) and the least they will accept is £800!!

Edited by marts_uk
Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe your best bet is to ignore them and wait for a DCA to contact you.

Do not get me wrong I hate DCAs too, but maybe they will be more willing to make a payment plan with you, and ignoring them at first usually gets them to halve the debt as an offer of settlement.

If you are someone who can put money aside easily ( im not) do so, and if the DCAs offer you this option, you have the money to pay it in one go to accept the deal.

 

On the other hand, I had a payday loan a couple of years ago, and the company tried to take the money earlier than they agreed, and I got a £35 charge off the bank, I cancelled my card, and without knowledge they set a DD up and tried again. I too changed bank, and told them I was taking legal action against them. Never heard from them since, and I never paid. Only Crudit Solutions tried to get anything, and I told them to prove it was me who ticked the electronic box on the app forms online.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done nish for what u are doing to them. If they take your money you have the right to contact the police and your bank . Some payloans companies are breaching the otf

stealing peoples money.

Iaintw is a registered customer services official/profit Protection staff/supermarket worker and who deals with customers

Buying laptops with advice etc

ISP Moderator and chat room helper for chats

Aviationist and train advice

Credit references and bank helper advice

Loss Protection (civil recovery)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have only whizzed through your post but just wanted to tell you a little about my situation!

I have about 6 payday loans adding up to about £2000 & was really struggling to pay them all, so i cancelled my card & stopped all payments ( mainly cos they wanted me to make card payments which would mean that they have my details & can dip into my account). I contacted CCCS & am now on a DMP & the payday loans are getting about £5-£10 a month. I have been on the DMP for 4 months & the companies haven't contacted me at all.

 

This way worked for me & I hope you manage to sort yourself out!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...