Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NHS Paramedic - Help !! my work keep refusing my leave requests


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4557 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi CAG friends, I am in need of your help and expertise, I am frustrated and hope there is someone here who can give me some advice. In short, I keep getting my "time off in lieu" (TOIL) requests refused. Below is what they emailed me,,,,,,

 

Good Morning,

Unfortunately your TOIL request has been refused for the following reasons:

 

X2 people already on leave

Weekend demand

 

This TOIL request could be granted if you can find someone to cover this shift for you or alternatively you can try to find a staff member willing to do a shift swap for you.

 

 

below is response I emailed but have not heard back.

 

Hi ......,

I do not understand why my TOIL request has been refused. I have given reasonable notice (16 days). The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service state "The default notice period must be twice as long as the period of leave requested". The Employment Relations Act 1999 and the Employment Act 2002 state "at least 2 weeks notice". Agenda for change state "TOIL should be taken within 3 months of the hours worked. Any hours not taken within 3 months will be forfeited." This is now the third TOIL request I have been refused. Where are restrictions on taking TOIL expressed in contract of employment ? Having given 16 days notice, please explain why the resource office is not willing to arrange cover for a 10hr day shift on 12/11/11. What resources have the resource office utilised in an effort to honour my TOIL request ? Please will you email me a current copy of the level of cover at ......... station for the 12/11/11.

 

What can i do ?..... its frustrating because they can always use operational demand as an excuse not to give me leave, isn't TOIL hours they owe me ? what law can I quote or reply can I give to get a posative outcome ?

many thanks in advance :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your own response would appear to be a reasonable assessment of the legal position re TOIL. Their answer should be interesting.

 

If they continue to deny you TOIL as is your entitlement if you are due it, they are liable to be in breach of contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your reply concillitator, I am frustrated that they keep putting the onus or obligation on the workers to cover the shifts for them, i feel that's their job. I have worked the extra hours,they should let me have the time off they owe me. I bet they just come back to me with , ....due to operation demand and current shortfalls on station i can not authorise your leave however if you can get someone to cover your shift or a shift swap i will grant your leave.... yade yadee ya they can use this excuse everytime (sigh....)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I presume that the reason you have accumulated TOIL entitlement was that you were prepared to help ease ‘operation demand’ and fill in for the ‘shortfalls on station’ in the first place.

 

Your supervisor seems to be under the impression that your statutory rights can be flouted now because of his failure to manage operational demand and shortfall in the cover he is obliged in his position to provide.

 

Unless it states in your contract that you must arrange for your own cover if you want a day off he are adding a condition that you had not agreed to. This unilateral action on his part could be construed as a breach of contract. You have given him sufficient notice and you have quoted ACAS and the relevant ERAs chapter and verse which support your stance. It seems that he is quite prepared to brow-beat you into accepting his decision to deny your fair request.

 

If I were advising myself I would call his bluff. I would respond to his email by saying something along the following lines:

 

“Despite several requests for time off the response is always the same, request denied on grounds of operational demands and shortfalls, and the invitation to fulfil the management functions myself if my request is ever to be considered. Consequently, and having given the required notice, I am insisting on my statutory rights being honoured and will be taking the stated time off. Managing rosters and cover is a supervisory or management duty, not my responsibility.”

 

If you are then threatened with suspension, or even dismissal, you would be in a position to argue that consideration of operational demands and shortfalls don’t seem to enter the equation when he threatens disciplinary action for claiming a statutory right but are sufficient grounds on which to deny your requests for one day off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tread carefully on this one. As a front line NHS worker, different rules apply. In any event, 16 days notice might not be considered 'reasonable notice'.

 

I had 13 years in an Ambulance NHS trust and left at the point 'agenda for change' was rolled out. A lot of rights were swept away and agreed by Unison. Sadly, people got blinded by a lack of information and greed in a pay increase.

 

Speak to your union rep as a matter of urgency.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tread carefully on this one. As a front line NHS worker, different rules apply. In any event, 16 days notice might not be considered 'reasonable notice'.

 

I had 13 years in an Ambulance NHS trust and left at the point 'agenda for change' was rolled out. A lot of rights were swept away and agreed by Unison. Sadly, people got blinded by a lack of information and greed in a pay increase.

 

Speak to your union rep as a matter of urgency.

 

 

As per my 1st post they have refused my request because of "X2 people already on leave and Weekend demand" they have not said it is to short notice. I have searched high and low and spoken to some union reps and There is only a resource brief document which is considered "live" like an ongoing draft subject to change. it only relates to annual leave not TOIL, i cant find anything in policy about toil requests....

 

3. Annual Leave – Managed Rotas.

 

3.1 Requests should be submitted in line with the current local agreements and faxed or emailed to the Resource Office on the Generic Application Form at Appendix 2.

 

3.2 Staff are required to give a minimum of 21 days notice for leave to be considered. If less than 21 days it is the responsibility of the individual staff member to arrange appropriate like for like cover with regards to skill mix. This is consistent with the timescales for allocating relief shifts to those on managed rotas.

 

3.3 Annual leave will be granted on the basis of allowing 80.5 hours per week per team of 10, subject to relief being available. This is whole shifts only and will be calculated pro rata for other sized teams.

 

3.4 This allocation will be no more than 2 shifts per day and must not be matching shifts i.e. 2 nights.

 

3.5 The Resource Office will authorise or decline any requests and will notify stations. The target will be to deal with any request and to respond within 3 working days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is where i think they can keep refusing it acording to agenda for change.....

3.5 Staff may request to take time off in lieu as an alternative to overtime

payments. However staff who, for operational reasons, are unable to

take time off in lieu within three months must be paid at the overtime

rate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey CAG Just had a response back from them today it is below ....really hope someone can give me some advice on what to write back .... times running out and I am really hoping to get this day off to attend a family event. many thanks for your time with my problem

.

 

Good morning ....

 

As you are aware you are on a managed rota, when looking at your TOIL request the relief aspect is looked at. In this case there is no relief available to cover your request as I specified in my original email. The resource office’s role is not to cover annual leave as there is sufficient relief built into the rota which should be managed locally.

 

What I would suggest is that in future when looking at making a TOIL request you check to see whether there is available relief to cover this and in line with previous resource briefings you give the required 21 days notice.

 

If you are still not happy with this decision then please contact either your line manager or your HR Advisor, I have copied both of them into this email.

 

Regards

.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...