Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Council sent "Notice of Rejection to FR" but never received communication stated!

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4647 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Good afternoon forum,


I wondered if I could get some advice on this please.


In July 2011 I received a PCN from Bexley Council whilst parking in OAKLANDS ROAD car park, with contravention "Parked in a car park without clearly displaying a valid pay and display ticket or voucher or parking clock"


I challenged the PCN stating that the car park had only recently introduced 24 hour parking charges, I had parked at 11pm at night for just over 30 minutes and affixed the P+D ticket on my windscreen - the lighting levels are TERRIBLE in that car park, and as such the CEO probably didnt see my ticket and just assumed I hadn't paid.


I never received any correspondence back from the council - until TODAY!


I've received a letter titled "Notice of Rejection of Formal Representation Response to Holding (FR)" stating the reason for the Council's decision:


"The Council previously sent you a Notice of Holding indicating that additional evidence and/or documentation was needed to consider your representation comprehensively. You were given a specific time period in which you were advised you must supply the requested evidence and or documentation, otherwise the Council would serve a Notice of Rejection on you.


There is no record from the case file that you have supplied the Council with the requested evidence and or documentation, within the required time period specified or indeed at all, accordingly, the Council must make a decision based on the evidence so far presented and in this instance the Council must uphold the issue of the PCN."


First of all, is it me or does the response given to me above seem like something thats essentially been copied and pasted from a "blanket response" document?


Secondly, I have never received any request for additional documentation "and/or" evidence...in fact I never even was acknowledged that the Council received my initial challenge.


Can I get some afvice please on a recommended course of action? Do I:


a.) take this to PATAS stating that I have reason to believe the Council have not considered my appeal at all, simply sending out a blanket response and lied about sending me correspondance

b.) write to the Council again stating the facts above - even though the NoR states "please do not send your appeal to Bexley Council", and ask them to prove their points?


Look forward to hearing your thoughts!



Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a pre-written response, but that doesn't mean they didn't consider your letter - it's just not practical to sit and type out a custom reply to every appeal, so they use standard paragraphs.


What seems to have happened is that they sent you a letter, probably asking for a copy of your p&d ticket, but you never got it.


As their letter says "rejection of formal representations", this implies you were also issued a Notice To Owner. Do you know anything about that, and did you respond to it?


If you have a copy of the pay & display ticket, you might be able to resolve this by calling them and telling them you never got the letter, and asking them to consider it now, if you send a copy in. They may agree.


Can you advise if you were issued a Notice to Owner?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jamberson,


Thanks for your reply


I've never been issued a Notice to Owner in relating to this - the only documentation I have is the original PCN affixed to my vehicle.


I can probably dig out the original P+D as I have to keep all of them for business expense purposes.





Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case, I would suggest you do try and find the p&d ticket, then phone the council and clarify a couple of things:


1. Have they issued a Notice to Owner?

2. If not, why have they sent you a Notice of Rejection to a formal representation (which they cannot do before an NTO is issued and appealed)?

3. What were the contents of this alleged letter "Notice of Holding"?


They look like they have fouled up procedure, but at this stage, it's probably best to play friendly. If they see they've sent a Notice of Rejection in error, and you offer them the evidence they wanted in the first place, then if they agree, you can assume they will cancel the PCN when they see the evidence. (I assume your p&d ticket is all OK.)


Of course, if they don't agree, you need to confirm that an NTO will be sent to you in due course, and when it is, you can appeal on the grounds of impropriety, but hopefully it won't go that far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The PCN was issued in July. It is possible an NTO has already gone out - we don't know. The advice to sit and wait carries a risk that the next thing to arrive will be a Charge Certificate, to which there is no right of appeal and no route to adjudication. Better to get to the bottom of where the case is at.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...