Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the dca is BCW - i haven't heard from them since early 2015, they wrote offering discounts etc, which seemed a strange approach straight off the bat  - this was when i told them i didn't acknowledge the debt, it was long-since time-barred, that i didn't believe that they had an enforceable agreement and they could either issue proceedings or bugger off.  I haven't heard a word since, via email or post, and assumed that my position had been accepted. I check Experian and Equifax every month, and was advised to check TransUnion for completeness, which is where it shows. If i make an SAR, is this likely to wake them up, or serve as an acknowledgment, or should I just wait until the end of the year when it would, i assume, drop off in any case?
    • I've looked up Multiple Encashment Fraud. When they put the chargeback amount back into my bank account, which they did the day I made the chargeback, I spent the cash over the next couple of weeks. I did this because I assumed I would win the chargeback due to the fact that I did everything required to win it. So me spending that cash, according to them is Multiple Encashment Fraud. They are saying I fraudulently made a chargeback so that they would put that amount back into my account so I could spend it, and basically rip the bank off.
    • dca please.?   Barclays would have marked the A/c Defaulted on or before sale, and issued a default notice a dca debt buyer cannot issue a default notice    send Barclays an sar.   the A/c was opened whilst resident in Scotland that means the debt is statute barred and extinguished,, dead gone parrot. though that has no relevance to a credit file.    
    • scan it all up to one multipage PDF read upload carefully   I suspect its the usual stuff they troll out for vanquis card debt those  application forms are not a credit agreement    lots of previous Lowell claimform threads here to read that explains why.   dx  
    • In late 2014, I received correspondence from a DCA acting on behalf of Barclays, pursuing a student overdraft of around £1k from 2003. I hadn't used this account in many years, well over six, and it is my belief (though, in full honesty,   I can't actually remember, and can't prove anything) that it was closed a couple of years later in around 2004/2005/2006 (and it wasn't on my credit file in 2014), and the overdraft transferred to RBS (an account also closed so long ago that it is long since gone from my credit file. I certainly don't recall using it after 2004, and it was quite common then to transfer student accounts/overdrafts between banks.   I emailed the DCA, stating that I didn't acknowledge the debt, that it would be statute-barred in any case, and requested an original credit agreement. None was forthcoming,   after some back and forth, I invited them to issue proceedings if they felt they had an enforceable credit agreement. They did not respond.   I am currently looking at applying for a mortgage, and have noticed that whilst this account doesn't appear on Equifax or Experian, it is on my TransUnion file, showing as set up in 2003 and defaulted in 2015.   Does anyone have any advice as to what I should do? The 2019 Doyle case might make my contention that it was statute-barred somewhat shakier, though, equally, I haven't heard anything about it in over five years,   I cannot believe that, if the account was not closed/settled in the mid-2000s as I believe, that Barclays would not have issued a default notice before 2015. Does anyone have any advice as to what I should do?   I want this off my credit file, even if the account wasn't closed in 2004, I believe that Barclays/its DCA are trying to pull a fast one by recording a default in January 2015, but given that neither party has any records with which to validate their belief/position, it hardly seems fair that I pay out for something that either doesn't exist or ought to be statute barred? A further point is that whilst it is Barclays, the account was opened at a branch in Scotland (where I lived/studied), where I believe that the Limitation period is five years, so, even if it transpired that the default was legitimately in 2015, would the matter now be statute barred anyway? Or would it be six years given that I now live in England?
  • Our picks

TinaTurner2

1987 Barclaycard - No Agreement - What to do now?

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3011 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I wonder if someone could give us some advice on what to do.

 

OH had an Egg card which was terminated with the other few thousand back in 2009. Went to court and won just less than £5k in Dec 2010. Egg still haven't paid the Judgement and we've offered to make payments on the remainder but Egg refused. Egg issued defaults in May 2011 and this has been referred to the FOS.

 

In the meantime, Barclaycard took over Egg accounts. So I don't know if the following story is due to this outstanding Egg issue.

 

OH took out a BC in 1987. £10k of debt on it currently. He requested CCA in an SAR in July 2010. Followed it up a couple of times and finally got a 'reconstituted agreement' in July this year with normal letter saying they were allowed to do reconstituted etc (which we knew was allowable).

 

BUT, the reconstituted agreement had an address from 7 years after he took the card out (3 removed from the correct address) and, presumably, the wrong T&Cs so we wrote back in July saying it was wrong. We had a letter in September saying they were still looking at it.

 

Just received. 2 letters from them today in the same envelope. The first dated 28th Oct says that they are unable to provide the agreement and that they are prevented from enforcing the agreement but that if we don't continue to pay then they will inform credit ref agencies, debt collection companies, issue default notices, etc.. The second dated 27th Oct says they are "currently unable to provide a copy" and that they accept that they are "prevented from enforcing our agreement with you while this state of affairs continues". They then go on to say that they are suspending the account with immediate effect because "in our view there is a significantly increased risk that you will cease to make payments".

 

We've never missed a payment but we have reclaimed default charges. We've never intimated that we wouldn't be paying the debt if they couldn't find the agreement and never even mentioned anything about unenforceability in our letters.

 

Any suggestions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TT,

 

It is normal practice for BC and other banks to restrict any further borrowing on an a/c after you make a CCA request.

 

It would be reasonable for them to assume that either:-

 

1. You are experiencing financial difficulties and so are looking at whether debts are enforceable.

 

2. You are looking at whether the debt is enforceable as a means of avoiding repayment.

 

You say you have no intention of not continuing to repay. However, I suspect that you will have difficulty in persuading BC of this.

 

As you continue to pay off the a/c, they will reduce the credit limit each month until the debt is clear.

 

If I thought you had a reasonable chance of arguing about this with BC, I'd say so. But the reality, I suspect, is that they will not budge.

 

If you want to get a credit card elsewhere, this should may possible although you won't find out until you apply.

 

It would be worth first checking on your credit files, to see that no adverse markers are in place.

 

:-)


We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As for the £5000 Egg judgement- its up to YOU to enforce this judgement.

 

Otherwise, what was the point of taking legal action against them if you weren't going to see it through?

 

Thats what bailiffs are for. :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As for the £5000 Egg judgement- its up to YOU to enforce this judgement.

 

Otherwise, what was the point of taking legal action against them if you weren't going to see it through?

 

Thats what bailiffs are for. :-)

 

Agreed............ unless Egg/BC have offset the judgment against current balance with or without notice to court/claimant...... its shoddy practice but will sway a dj

 

Check first, if definitely not settled its worth the £100.00 fee [recoverable] to enforce with HCEO

 

Is the Egg assigned account the same as the BC account or do you mean there are 2 [1 with an outstanding judgment and 1 in dispute re CCA] ?

 

Gez

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How can that be fair? Surely we can excersize this right without retribution?

 

I read in the OFT literature this "treating any right conferred on the debtor or hirer by the agreement as terminated, restricted or deferred" is not allowed if a contract is unenforceable. Is the suspension or removal of the credit facility not a restriction?

 

Will FOS do anything to help us?

 

And what would happen if we actually didn't pay?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@gezwee

 

They didn't offset the Judgement against the balance. The balance pre-judgement was £12k. The judgement was given in Nov 2010 as a judgement in default (although we were in constant contact with Egg and their solicitors during this time and they said they would 'vigorously defend', they didn't file a defence. They said this was because we didn't send particulars but we sent signed for and gave them all the details of the woman in the post room who signed for them (I spoke to the post lady myself and she explained their internal process). They then said this doesn't prove they were delivered to the right person in the building and that they would claim damages if we went ahead and got a judgement in default. We got a judgement in default in the Nov. They said it was a 'technicality' and that they were applying to set aside. They didn't make the set aside application until April 2011 and the judge threw it out. In May they issued a default and terminated the account. The defaults/termination/credit file all have £12k on. at just about £5k which should have brought the balance down to £7k. Before the trial (like a week) we offered to pay the £7k but they never got back to us. During this time we offered to make a F&F and asked for a figure but we had no responses to any letters we wrote between Dec 2010 and August 2011. At beginning of August we wrote to them the last time saying that they should not have issued the default in May and how could they terminate an account that was terminated 2 years ago. At the end of sept we issued a complaint through FOS. Then in October we got a response to our august letter saying that it was the same complaint that we made last november and so they had added it to that - but they didn't actually reply. We think they did this because you only have 6 months to make a complain to FOS and, if they could claim that the original complaint was november, that we were out of time to go to FOS. We wrote back saying that the event that happened (the default/termination) happened in May so how could it possibly be related to a complaint in Nov, especially as we didn't write to them in Nov. We had no response.

 

As to why we couldn't enforce the judgement....because Egg had indicated that they were going to set aside we were unable to do anything until that hearing took place in May this year. Immediately after the hearing (like, days) they issued the defaults and termination and we have been trying to get that sorted out. At the moment they are not chasing us for the balance of the account (although we're happy to discuss this with them and have been trying) and if we enforce the action and they pay then we may no longer have leverage to get the defaults removed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And there are 2 different accounts. A BC from 1985ish and an Egg Card from early 2000ish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning TT

 

You really need to start action to enforce the earlier judgment........... not a clue what BC think they're up to defaulting sums no longer owed post judgment.

 

Did the judgment include post judgment interest?

 

Honestly think you'll be fighting an uphill battle with FoS, they're more likely to side with the creditor.... and yes, I'd agree it is unfair on the complainant but it is becoming a regular occurence with them.

 

Gez

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was Egg who issued the defaults post-judgement, not BC. I believe it was before BC took them over but we've had no correspondence at all from Egg or BC so we technically aren't aware if the Egg account got transferred to BC.

 

Yes, the judgement included post-judgement statutory interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TT

 

Assume the judgment was issued against Egg Banking Plc at their Canary Wharf address?

 

I'd prioritise the enforcement first, have you checked your CRA files to see if Egg or BC are reporting this account?

 

Gez

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, Citibank at Canary Wharf.

 

Barclaycard have never reported anything to a CRA ever for the Barclaycard account or for the Egg account.

 

Egg initially stopped reporting in Feb 2009 when they did the blanket terminations and they set it as settled with no balance at that time. Then they marked it as defaulted in May this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like the assignment may have been reversed whilst in litigation [set-aside hearing], should mean its still held by Egg but due to judgment the value is no longer being accurately reported with CRA's........ if it were me I'd be reminding them of their duties to the DPA and getting a complaint off to the ICO.

 

Write to Egg setting out your concerns [data] and remind them of their obligation to remedy

 

Oh and send the bailiffs in to get your money :-)

 

Gez

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...