Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Disability Discrimination


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4480 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You absolutely right! they want her to go away quietly in empty hands and that's not all she had to give away all her claims and won't get another job! That's what they did sound.

 

Prishan

 

Hello again. What do you mean about 'giving away all her claims' please?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello again. What do you mean about 'giving away all her claims' please?

 

My best, HB

 

they gave her two options either to take a demotion and stay with them or leave signing a compromise agreement whereby she has to give up any claim she has (gagging clause).

Link to post
Share on other sites

What little advice I can give you is gather all the evidence you have against this company and starta employment tribunal hearing. The ET has a strict 3 month rule regarding claims. Although you could arguethe discrimination is ongoing. The company has clearly breached employment law by demoting her in the manner it has.I take it the 2 of you work together, will you be prepared to be a witness on her behalf at a ET hearing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Need an advice urgently!

 

My mate has informed HR and Top boss about her disability on a number of occasions by letter about her disability and asked for readjustments. But, they did not acknowledge her disability nor they took any steps towards reasonable readjustments.

 

Now question is does she have to raise a formal grievance of discrimination against her disability as soon as possible? or it should only be raised prior to ET claim?

If she raise the grievance now and claim is not submitted within a fixed time period will that make the claim out of time?

 

Your advice is highly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes! Its there. thank you very much.

 

Does she need to raise the grievance against any particular person like Head of HR or the Chief coz' she informed both of them?

 

In her company, they have separate grievance procedures and forms to fill in. and the form requires her to state the person she is bringing grievance against.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'My mate has informed HR and Top boss about her disability on a number of occasions by letter about her disability and asked for readjustments.'

 

You friend will also have a Personnel File, it might be a good idea to get hold of that.

 

Also gather as much documentary information as possible.

 

Some more info here:- http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights/rights-of-workers/index.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

'My mate has informed HR and Top boss about her disability on a number of occasions by letter about her disability and asked for readjustments.'

 

You friend will also have a Personnel File, it might be a good idea to get hold of that.

 

Also gather as much documentary information as possible.

 

Some more info here:- http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights/rights-of-workers/index.html

 

Thank you Rebel. I will ask her to do that. By the way do you know anything about this service clicklaw.com an online fixed fee advice?

 

are they reliable?

any employment hand book you can suggest we read? She is at a loss when it comes to a legal issue:whoo:

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

my mate has one serious question. She was online with home insurance legal. the lady says my mate has already accepted a downgrade by working in downgrade for long 10 months before she went off sick though she was paid in her original terms and condition.

 

In fact, her manager asked her to come back to work in a temporary capacity under another colleague for introducing into a development plan to re-build her confidence as they did keep her off work for a long while. He also said in writing that she will remain in the current terms and condition and further confirmed that she remains employed in her original status after she raised a grievance to any demotion. she continued in the new placement where the work was downgrade expecting that issues will be resolved soon in the without prejudice negotiation but as the latter end in a stalemate she revoked all her grievances and notified her disability.

 

Is she correct that my mate has actually accepted a downgrade given the above?

 

the employer didn't appear to have acknowledge her disability yet send her to OH as she is on sick but insists it is about bringing her back to a demoted position not to her contracted position. This seems according to insurance legal that its an Act of discrimination through disability. Now there could be a claim.

 

Guys question is it so and I should better go ahead with DD claim?

 

all advice is very much welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems clear dispute to me, which should be grieved about and taken to the ET to sort out. Perhaps she should get a solicitor on to it after the grievance phase.

 

That's right! she thought of the same and raised this issue with the insurance lady about raising grievance to it...she insists grievance will be seen negatively because there are three more grievance already not heard. She thinks employer could argue a breach of trust and confidence if I raise another grievance.:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's right! she thought of the same and raised this issue with the insurance lady about raising grievance to it...she insists grievance will be seen negatively because there are three more grievance already not heard. She thinks employer could argue a breach of trust and confidence if I raise another grievance.:???:

 

In that case see a solicitor.... this is getting very complicated for a forum and perhaps needs skilled eyes on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems clear dispute to me, which should be grieved about and taken to the ET to sort out. Perhaps she should get a solicitor on to it after the grievance phase.

 

That's right Papas! my mate thought the same. She raised that with the insurance solicitor about raising a grievance first but she kinda discouraged her do that saying you have three grievances not heard yet one more will be seen negatively. Employer can say there's a breach of trust and confidence and sacked her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup papas. Its really getting complicated. We tried to get hold of a solicitor in the past but failed to find a reliable one and finance obviously was a big question and still so.

 

Any idea the best way to find an affordable and reliable one?

 

sorry asking a hard question.

 

BW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. I can't remember if this has already been suggested, but have you seen the CAB? They should be able to put you in touch with an employment lawyer who will hopefully give a free initial interview.

 

I wonder if the home insurance lawyer was thinking that working on under the new conditions for some months amounted to something like custom and practice or acceptance, I can't quite remember all the terms? And I don't know if it's relevant, just a thought.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for the enlightenment with lots of info that you all have given us .

we believe when one door closes, another opens.

we will try to make best use of the info you guys kindly shared with us.

 

Very kind of you all.

 

Thanks again. All the best.

 

Prishan

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi Guys

 

came back again to tell the truth that you are doing a great job over internet helping those poor employees to be able to stand on their feet and fight for their rights!!

 

I thought its high time that I need your advice for my mate. She disclosed her disability about 6 months ago and asked for readjustments back to her contracted position. At the same time she had to go sick off work due to the stress caused by her employer as the latter forcing her to accept a demotion.

 

The HR asked her to attend Occupational Health for assessment but It was clear from Occupational Health statement that they were not provided with information of her disability other than her being sick off stress and depression. The HR was insisting for an assessment of her depression in an attempt to return her to a demoted post where she had been temporarily prior to going off sick ignoring any possible readjustment in the light of her disability.

 

She declined to attend such an occupational Health appointment and insists that sicknes policy should be followed correctly as advrtised by HR wherein a readjustment should be to a contracted post not to someother uncontracted duties.

 

She raised formal grievance against the employer's attempt in following wrong sickness policy and other discriminatory acts. Meanwhile, her sick leave completed first 6 months and HR informed her today that from the begining of this month her salary will be halved.

 

She did raise a number of grievances related to the wrong and discriminatory course of action pursued by various memebers of the management but it is now 6 months and none of these were heard. The employer utterly failed to follow theiir statutory grievance procedures but very keen to follow the sickness one rather in the wrong way.

 

Now, she wonders that why her leave absences should not be considered under disability and why she should not be entitled to full sick pay, when there is specific case laws in this regard.

 

My question is if the emplyer deliberately pursue to ignore its duty under Equality Act to do the reasonable adjustment for employee to return to work should the Court action be the only remedy for an employee available? :mad2:

 

I will greatly appreciate any comments and advice as to what next step my mate should take. Should she raise a grievance against reducing her sick pay? If so what arguments she should put forward to defend full sick pay. She is planning to make an ET1 soon.:-(

 

Thank you again

Prishan

Edited by honeybee13
I've put in a few paragraphs to make this easier to read.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...