Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I'm getting nowhere with eBay Customer Support, Live Chat, so what do I do?


Maz73
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4561 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't know if I'm posting this in the right place, I'm demented right now after yet another phone call to so called eBay 'Customer Support' (and must have downed 1/2 bottle of vodka just trying to deal with those numpties!).

 

Basically, I've been phoning eBay for the past 6 weeks (since my account was hijacked). They credited most of the fees for the 200 items not listed by me) but not all of them.

 

I have been passed around every department, some of them telling me that 'everything's been credited' when it's not, spent hours on the phone to them (nearly 4 hours one night), I just keep getting passed around to every department, and no one seems capable, or willing, to sort this out.

 

I want this sorted out so that I can pay the fees that I do actually owe, and obviously to keep my account.

 

Anyonw know how to deal with these 'dafties'???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, Rebel. Sorry, just realised that I hadn't even thanked you (just recovering from this bug that's going around, and hasn't been helped by the stress of trying to get this resolved).

 

I did email Clare Gilmartin, haven't had a reply or even an acknowledgement though. Not really surprised though.

 

I didn't actually make it a complaint, although did state my grievances about CS, but explained the problem and asked her if she could please look into it and sort it out.

 

I thought I'd keep it 'quite nice' give her a chance to resolve it. Would a Letter of Complaint make a difference? I've asked them where I can find their Complaints Policy, was given false information by CS, and told I'd find it on the Help tab on the site, lol.

 

If someone would only do their job, they'd receive the fees that I do owe!! lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get the hell away from the Imbeciles. I spent 34mins on the damn phone this morning (Friday), then the damn phone went dead. At the beginning of the phone call they told me the wait was 10mins. I never bought anything straight forward, there is always a drama. People ripping people off like Susan7873 (court case pending) and getting away with it, people buying stuff and then not paying. Ebay do nothing about it. They're thieving, useless b*stards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've addressed it for her attention, then it's a Complaint, if none of their Customer Service doesn't work, then you complain to her as a last resort, lets see what she says.

 

Thanks for that, Rebel. Sorry, just realised that I hadn't even thanked you (just recovering from this bug that's going around, and hasn't been helped by the stress of trying to get this resolved).

 

I did email Clare Gilmartin, haven't had a reply or even an acknowledgement though. Not really surprised though.

 

I didn't actually make it a complaint, although did state my grievances about CS, but explained the problem and asked her if she could please look into it and sort it out.

 

I thought I'd keep it 'quite nice' give her a chance to resolve it. Would a Letter of Complaint make a difference? I've asked them where I can find their Complaints Policy, was given false information by CS, and told I'd find it on the Help tab on the site, lol.

 

If someone would only do their job, they'd receive the fees that I do owe!! lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...