Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Illegal eviction and deposit deductions


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4570 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,Long story, but will try to keep it as short as possible.Tenant and landlord mutually agreed to end tenency early for personal reasons. Agreed date was 24th May. Actually moved out on 1st May, but kept going back and forth to previous property and was intending to fully clean and do gardening, etcetera before 24th.tenant turns up on 4th May to find locks have been changed and gets home to find an email from landlords agent advising that new locks to be charged to tenant as keys had not been retuned and that all cleaning costs and rubbish removal will be charged to tenant.tenant advises that this is illegal and they still need to do cleaning etcetera, but landlords agent dioesnt seem to care and does not respond.Tenant raises a dispute to TDS to recover deposit, meanwhile landlord makes a court claim for rent arrears up to the 24th. Court papers sent to wrong address so default judgement made, tenant makes application for a set aside and has a hearing date for next year.TDS decide to award whole of deposit to landlord for cleaning, rent arears and gardening.If this at all makes any sense, does it seem right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was rent actually paid up to the 24th?

do have this agreed end of tenancy in writing? Hoe can they charge for rent to 24th when you not in possession, they have taken it back!!

Not only should they get the original ruling set aside, they should start their own action for return of deposit, distress, expenses and anything else they can think of.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Were the court papers sent to the tenancy address? Had you provided a forwarding address to the landlord? If you had not provided a forwarding address then it may be difficult to get the court decision set aside (as in it is your own fault you didn't get the papers). How do you know about the court decision?

 

Do you have the agreement regarding the early surrender in writing?

 

DPS would have tried to contact you by telephone and email - did this not happen, or did they change and you didn't tell them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was rent actually paid up to the 24th?

do have this agreed end of tenancy in writing? Hoe can they charge for rent to 24th when you not in possession, they have taken it back!!

Not only should they get the original ruling set aside, they should start their own action for return of deposit, distress, expenses and anything else they can think of.

 

Rent was paid up th the 4th when they changed the locks.I have the date in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Were the court papers sent to the tenancy address? Had you provided a forwarding address to the landlord? If you had not provided a forwarding address then it may be difficult to get the court decision set aside (as in it is your own fault you didn't get the papers). How do you know about the court decision?

 

Do you have the agreement regarding the early surrender in writing?

 

DPS would have tried to contact you by telephone and email - did this not happen, or did they change and you didn't tell them?

 

Court papers were not sent to the tenancy address. I provided a forwarding address, but they sent them to my friends address that they heard I was staing at, but I wasnt.

As above, I have the agreement of the date in writing

Not sure what you mean by the DPS trying to contact me, it was I who started proceedings against the landlord to get the deposit back due to illegal eviction, but the TDS found in favour of the landlord, as did the courts, so they now have, in effect, been paid twice for a period where I did not occupy the property and received money for cleaning etc, even though I was prevented from cleaning myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it possible for me to get the court judgement thrown out or something similar as LL has already got the money through the TDS? I could then tackle the TDS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be worth clearing up some things

 

First, if you mean "TDS" then TDS do not keep the money. They only insure the money. LL or agent keeps the money. DPS are the only tenancy deposit company that actually keep the money.

 

With regard to the tenancy deposit scheme, the landlord (or tenant) can choose not to use the scheme for arbitration. If the LL went to court and won (as he did) then TDS would not be involved. Could this be what happened?

 

Or did LL additionally submit evidence to TDS in response to your claim and win this as well? (this wouldn't be the right way of doing things, note, as you are supposed to use *either* the deposit resolution scheme offered by TDS *or* the courts - not both!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see why the deposit has been paid to the LL given the court judgment, but if that is set aside it'll be a different matter. I'm not an expert in this field (or any other for that matter!) but wonder if you should counterclaim for 3 times the deposit. I think you'd need the set aside first though which would then give you the opportunity to defend the original claim.

 

I suggest you PM Ed999 with a link to this thread and get him to take a look.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nat

 

I am sorry to hear of your difficultites. Perhaps you could clarify a couple of things;

 

Hi,Long story, but will try to keep it as short as possible.Tenant and landlord mutually agreed to end tenency early for personal reasons. Agreed date was 24th May.

 

Ok, so you moved out on 1st - locks were changed on 4th BUT you agreed to pay upto 24th - was this agreed in writing? What proof do you have you both came to this arrangement?

 

Actually moved out on 1st May, but kept going back and forth to previous property and was intending to fully clean and do gardening, etcetera before 24th.tenant turns up on 4th May to find locks have been changed and gets home to find an email from landlords agent advising that new locks to be charged to tenant as keys had not been retuned and that all cleaning costs and rubbish removal will be charged to tenant.tenant advises that this is illegal and they still need to do cleaning etcetera, but landlords agent dioesnt seem to care and does not respond.

 

 

How did they know you had left on 1st for them to change the locks on 4th? Did you send a reply to their email?

Tenant raises a dispute to TDS to recover deposit, meanwhile landlord makes a court claim for rent arrears up to the 24th. Court papers sent to wrong address so default judgement made, tenant makes application for a set aside and has a hearing date for next year.TDS decide to award whole of deposit to landlord for cleaning, rent arears and gardening.If this at all makes any sense, does it seem right?

 

What are your grounds for set aside application?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...