Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC Double Entry on my credit file?


moonstar1981
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3857 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I'm a newbie tackling my credit file/debts head on and this forum is fantastic and providing me with boundless information. I'm after some help with regards to a double entry from HSBC on my credit file:

 

I held an HSBC bank account with no credit overdraft facilities from September 2003. I closed my account in July 2009 as I had moved to Australia in 2009.

 

First entry states (CRA's are the same):

Account Type: Bank

Account opened: December 2004

Last Updated: July 2009

Opening Balance: 0

Current Balance: Closed July 2009

 

Status: Green/SettledOK

Not Defaulted

 

Second Entry states (CRA's - Callcredit has current balance and Equifax says CB is closed July 2009):

Account Type: Current Account

Account opened: September 2003

Last Updated: July 2011

Opening Balance: 52 pounds

Current Balance: 8,831 pounds

Status: Default

 

I closed my account with a zero balance so where the hell has 8,831 pounds come from? Also both of these entries have my name spelt incorrectly to?

 

Can anyone help me as it seems they have double entered onto my credit file and I've only ever had one previous account with HSBC which was a current account.

 

Thanks

Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Right so here's my story!

 

back in 2005 I had my HSBC current account and no loans or overdrafts.

 

I wanted to trade some stocks and opened up a shares account to do this.

 

I genuinely did not transfer any money into this share account and it had a balance of £10,000 which I thought was a test thing they do so you can see how it all works and try it out.

 

After having a play etc over a few weeks I realised I was rubbish at it and lost to much!

 

I then realised that thus was actual money I was playing with.

To the point where I had made a massive loss.

I had never agreed or signed to have an account credit and I know that I couldn't even get an overdraft on my current account as I had other debts at the time so why on here.

 

After complaing like mad in branch, they said they would sort the matter out for me.

Then in August 2009 they defaulted my current account and added the balance of debt from the share account to my current account.

 

I lost around £1700 of my money and they put a defaulted balance of £8,841 onto my current account.

 

I have never had any any loans, overdrafts or cc's with HSBC nor have I ever acknowledged this debt.

 

I lived in Australia for a few years, and upon returning found thus on my credit file :

 

Current account

Account opened:September 2003

Account closed/default date: August 2009

Reported to: August 2015

Balance £8841

 

After writing to HSBC in January 2013, about this and stating I don't acknowledge this debt and it is statute barred,

they wrote backand said they were looking into the matter and I would receive a reply on 29th January 2013.

 

Now they have sent me a letter stating that they have sold my debt to MK Rapid Recoveries and they are no longer dealing with my case.

 

On the same date as receiving this, MK rapid have sent me a letter demanding payment on this.

 

Any help on what my next steps should be?

 

I genuinely want to try and get thus removed from my credit file as I'm looking to buy a house in the next year.

 

Hope someone can offer some advice as I'm really worried now

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, The most obvious first step is a Subject Access Request to the bank, to get all the data on the account, and specifically to find out if the £10K was an unregulated overdraft or a loan, this will determine what response is to be made.

 

I suggest you send a Letter to |MKRR stating that you have raised a FORMAL COMPLAINT with the bank and can neither confirm nor deny any liability for the alleged debt.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The registered office, but ant branch will pass the request on.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The address below is the final hurdle/complaints team. This was the address I used before my case went further.

Also, anything you mail goes to Leeds and from there it is redirected to Coventry/West Midlands - anothing confusing strategy used by HSBC.

Service Quality Team

HSBC Bank plc

Arlington Business Centre

Millshaw Park Lane

Leeds

LS11 0PP

I went all the way to court to seek compensation for "damage to creditworthiness" against HSBC. I lost unfortunately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

This is just a quick update - I have sent off a Subject access request this week so hopefully this will provide a more clearer picture. However, I emailed HSBC back in December regarding this matter to see what insight I could further get. Today they have responded back 3 months later with a letter from there customer care team. It states:

 

Payments of £6488.98 and £1310.30 were made to Investment Direct which took your balance to £7907.35 overdrawn.

 

They state that they sent me a letter on 1st December 2008 clarifying there position on this matter - They have attached a copy of a letter (although they have hand written the date in???) I've posted pictures of what they have sent in there letter and there copy of there record. This letter dated 1 December 2008 was never received.

 

During the whole time I had my HSBC account I have never had any overdrafts or loans. I couldn't get anything on credit as I had a number of defaults and 2 CCJ's during this jperiod. I don't understand how they can state that I made orders through Invest Direct for the following amounts above and fufill the amounts through my current account? I'd never had a balance over £1.5K!!

 

On there letter dated December 2008, it states that "I offer my apologies that the letter sent was incorrect and confirmed that we would link this trading account to your bank account. I have now arranged for the correct letter to be issued" - This really doesn't make any sense to me.

 

Please can someone help me on how I can tackle this matter. I have genuinely been shafted by HSBC here :( I accepted no line of credit or nothing so I don't know how they can say I owe them this money.

 

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]42238[/ATTACH]

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]42241[/ATTACH]

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]42239[/ATTACH]

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]42240[/ATTACH]

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

There are photos of the letters they sent me in regards to this debt - I hope you can see them clearly enough, might have to download them to clearly view them. If not just let me know and I'll either type them up in here or dm them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Hi, The most obvious first step is a Subject Access Request to the bank, to get all the data on the account, and specifically to find out if the £10K was an unregulated overdraft or a loan, this will determine what response is to be made.

 

I suggest you send a Letter to |MKRR stating that you have raised a FORMAL COMPLAINT with the bank and can neither confirm nor deny any liability for the alleged debt.

 

Good afternoon,

 

After waiting 12 weeks for a SAR I have now finally received this!

 

After looking into this matter and seeing what information HSBC hold on me there are several failings the bank have done.

 

The InvestDirect account was open in 2003 but lay dormant.

 

1. There is no credit agreement at all for any amount in InvestDirect Account or Current Plus Account. Looking at all the documents they've sent I've noted these points....

 

2. 28th Nov 2008 - Trading Reserve Declined

3. 13th Nov 2008 - Welcome to InvestDirect. Note on FILE says "We have open a settlement Account, which is linked to your HSBC bank current account....You have a personal dealing limit of £10,000 meaning that you are able to place purchase orders up to this amount, whilst ensuring sufficient funds are available in your HSBC current Account. "

4. Payments on 14th NOV 2008 of £6488.98 and 17th NOV 2008 of £1310.30 were transferred from my current account to INVESTDIRECT.

 

So surely there are two key points here:

 

1. I never have agreed/signed/seen a credit agreement

2. There own point of "You have a personal dealing limit of £10,000, meaning that you are able to place purchase orders up to this amount, whilst ensuring sufficient funds are available in your HSBC current account" - On the 13th November 2008 my current account balance was £68.07 OVERDRAWN. Surely this means that they have screwed me over?

 

Again, I have never been accepted for any form of overdraft with the bank, turned down for numerous loans etc and never had a credit card with them. I have several CCJ's/DEFAULTS/LATE PAYMENTS during this time period and couldn't get accepted for credit anywhere. The current account in 21st NOV 2008 had a closing balance of £7907.23 and then they spent a year charging interest etc and closed the account on 30th July 2009 with a closing balance of £8912.04.

 

Could anyone please advise me what my next steps should really be on this matter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi there,

 

Long story short..

 

. Had an issue with an old HSBC debt that landed on my credit file halfway through buying a house a few months ago,

luckily I've got my house and

 

the last year I've been on the road to debt free recovery and managed to have all my debts made satisfactory bar one left now!

 

I had an old HSBC current account with a negative balance of £8,841 which defaulted on November 2008

(when I last paid something on the account) /

 

credit report states default was from 30th July 2009

 

they spent a year chargin interest and closed the trading account and applied it to my zero balanced current account).

 

It relates to a disagreement I had with the bank over a trading account overdraft

that was given to me without me asking for it and at the time I had several CCJ's

and couldn't get an overdraft on my current account.

 

After doing a SAR request with HSBC etc

I provided them with all the facts on my case and they said they are no longer in charge of the debt

and all quieries go to MKDP now.

 

I argued that they irresponsibly lent me (£10,000 overdraft on a share dealing account)

while I was still in a mountain of debt with CCJ's.

 

Since May 2013, I've written monthly to MKDP to request that they review my request of information

and case I presented to HSBC and look into why this default is there.

 

I have also sent them SAR's and had the same response every time.

 

I've now had 4 letters all stating the same thing from MKDP that they are still looking into the matter

and liaising with there client (HSBC)

 

- So getting no where with them.

 

The HSBC have never pursued this in the courts as I believe they know they just don't have a case or evidence to win.

 

Could anyone please advise me what my next steps should really be on this matter?

 

I want it off my credit file and I really don't know what the best course of action is.

 

Could I send MKDP any other letters?

 

Should I contact the HSBC and try and get a heavily discounted settlement in return for satisfactory status on my credit file?

 

Any ideas or thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 threads on passed history merged

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having read through your post a few times I cannot see any practical or achievable reason for the default too be removed from the account.

 

Clearly the account was defaulted because you ceased making any payments so what reason is there for the creditor or MKDP to remove the default.

 

The creditor must report the accurate and up to date conduct of the account to CRAs which it appears is being done, a 'dispute' doesn't prevent reporting to the CRAs.

 

I think any argument that there was irresponsible lending would need to be tested in court.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...