Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If it was done via N245 and the payments are up todate then the landlord must make an application with fee for a redetermination. Can't execute with bailiffs can't do anything until he attends a hearing and presents his arguments    ignore. Andy
    • Sorry I didn’t think to come and update this.    So the outcome was that he went to court. Apparently the judge told the landlord off for not sending a letter before action but did nothing about it. He didn’t accept all the damages the landlord claimed, and told him off for accusing my friend of deliberately and maliciously damaging anything, and he awarded him small amounts of the damages he claimed for. The landlord had also made an awful lot of things up that never existed and accused my friend of stealing them, and the judge didn’t accept any of those claims.   However, I’m back asking advice now. So he made an offer of payment via the court forms, sometime before Christmas and straight after the hearing. The landlord didn’t reply so the court accepted the payments.  My friend has been paying the £10 a month each month. Then a couple of days ago he had received a letter from court with a hearing date in a couple of weeks, and a very irate letter from the landlord saying that my friend has consistently lied and that nothing he says should be believed, and that he wants the bailiffs to be called on him and that he absolutely refuses the payment plan. The letter is marked as received by the courts in December and this is the first that’s been sent since then. My friend and his wife are now panicked, what does this mean? And can they now get bailiffs sent round? He earns an ok wage, which somehow the landlord has referred to in his letter, but he equally has a lot of expenditure and can’t afford to pay any more. What will happen at this hearing and can they send out the bailiffs just because the landlord wants them to?    I have no clue what to advise him, can you help at all please?
    • Thanks Bank – I took your cynicism / experience on board and responded thus: Thank you for your response Mr Schnur  I set out my position quite clearly in my letter of claim and nothing has changed. Your insurance requirement is unlawful and is contrary to section 57 of the Consumer Rights Act, and also section 72 of the same statute. I would also refer you to the outcomes in PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729).  My deadline for action - 1 May 2024 - still stands.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrows/Drydens chasing old Mbna card debt - MBNA had no CCA.


Hecuba
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1327 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Same scenario, and I've told Arrow that just because the purchased the alleged debt, that doesn't given them rights in any commercial affair concerning me so pack it in.

 

ALSO, that MBNA, knowing that the matter is in dispute, are breaching certain industry regulations.

 

PLUS, the alleged debt is apparently part of an agreement (unsubstantiated, unenforceable) between myself and MBNA, but because Arrow weren't party to that agreement they have ZERO rights. AND the alleged agreement is between me and MBNA, I have contended that there is NO agreement between me and Arrow of any kind, and they have in fact paid an unenforceable debt off in my name, which in law is deemed as a gift and I'm under no obligation to repay as I was not party to their actions. BTW, that account is now deemed SATISFIED and CLOSED on my credit file.

 

Dumbasses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Credit Warrior,

I don't know where yo get the idea that a bebt purhaser

have no rights to to pursue for payment of the debt, as when

debts are sold they are sold with ''All The Rights and Obligations

of The Original Agreement.

The File entry may just mean that Aroow have passed the debt

further down the food chain just to clear it off their books.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

I have an outstanding credit card debt with MBNA and which I have never acknowledged I am the debtor.

I sent a CCA request to MBNA and they replied telling me due to fact they are unable to provide me with original agreement this debt cannot be enforced. However I should continue to pay them money due. I have never acknowledged I am debtor.

 

Then MBNA sold credit card debt to Arrow Global and Maddersons sent me letters demanding payment.

I sent CCA request to Madderson and they didn't reply.

 

Then out of blue Clarity became Arrow Global's debt collectors and Clarity sent me letters demanding payment.

I sent Clarity same CCA request and today received a letter from Arrow Global.

 

Arrow Global say and I quote

'We do not accept we are the creditor as envisaged by the above statute (statute is Consumer Credit Act 1974).

However we are willing to assist in obtaining that which has been requested.

 

We will now process your request for documentation from the creditor and will revert in due course.

We confirm all collection activity will be suspended pending provision of the documents.

We return payment of £1.00.' (That payment is the postal order I sent to Maddersons).

 

Given MBNA are unable to provide me with my original credit card agreement I do not think Arrow Global will succeed.

Any advice would be much appreciated because Arrow Global are refuting they are the creditors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

Yes I did send Maddersons a copy of the letter I received from MBNA and that was when Maddersons went silent.

 

Then a month or so later Clarity became involved

I sent Clarity copy of same letter from MBNA.

 

I have succeeded in obtaining from Clarity written confirmation they will no longer ring me demanding payment.

But Arrow Global is another matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've not been on CAG much for quite a while so I'm a bit rusty, however there do seem to be one or two issues here.

 

IMHO, the account is in dispute so I believe MBNA have gone against OFT guidelines in selling-on the alleged debt to someone further down the food chain.

 

Arrow say they have suspended their collection activity until they provide you with the document which MBNA do not have so I'd just ignore all their waffle. I'm sure others will be able to advise on who to report them to (OFT etc.) if you receive any further harrassment from them.

 

In the meantime continue non-payment of the alleged debt (I presume you're not paying).

 

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

 

Many thanks for your helpful recommendations/advice and I have not been paying this alleged debt and neither have I ever acknowledged this old debt. I think they are attempting to bamboozle me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you receive a notice of assignment from MBNA/Global?

Mine came in the same envelope I think, one saying "we've sold the account" and one saying "we've bought the account".

 

If you've got anything like that then it's difficult to see how they are now claiming they don't own it.

MBNA have offloaded a lot of accounts to Arrow Global recently.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fred,

 

Many thanks for your email and I've just realised MBNA did not write to inform me they had sold the account to Arrow Global.

After MBNA sent me letter saying they weren't able to comply with my request for sight of original agreement etc.

 

I heard nothing else until out of the blue Arrow Global wrote informing me I allegedly owe x amount of money and I then realised MBNA had sold debt on to Arrow Global.

 

Hecuba

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, Arrow have (or maybe haven't bought a pig in the poke). This is all very strange.

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 years later...

I received two letters today from Drydrenfairfax solicitors who are acting for Arrow Global Guernsey Ltd. 

Both letters inform me there are two final charging orders on my home which I own outright. 

 

The two debts are credit card ones which originated with MBNA more than 8 years ago. 

At that time I was struggling with credit card debts and unemployed so I foolishly ignored the letters from MBNA. 

 

Then around 8 years ago I was told these two final charging orders had been placed on my property. 

Since then I heard nothing from MBNA and did not correspond with them. 

 

Then last week I received two letters from Arrow Global Guernsey Ltd. telling me they had passed the matter to Drydenfairfax

 I knew I would be receiving 'chase letters!' 

obviously Arrow global have bought these two debts for 'peanuts!'

 

Contents of the letters say

'There is currently no repayment arrangement in place to repay the above outstanding amount and your obligation to make appropriate repayments to repay this balance remains unchanged.'  The letter then states Arrow would be willing to accept a one off lump sum of x amount to settle my account. 

 

Drydenfairfax have also attached form concerning earnings/income which I will not complete. 

I am now retired and have only my state pension. 

I do not have savings so any advice would be most welcome. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Arrows/Drydens chasing old Mbna card debt - MBNA had no CCA.

are there any charges showing on your Deeds?

have you checked?

 

ive merged your old thread here for complete history.

 

drydens send these letters out to try and make people wet themselves and get cash cowed, they are often totally wrong about there being any existing legal charges or CCJ's.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi it's taken me a while to locate the information but I 've now downloaded copy of my title deeds and there is only one interim charge on my property. 

 

Arrow Global took out the interim charge on 22nd September, 2008 and since that date until recently I didn't receive any correspondence from them. 

 

I've no idea which of drydenfairfax's two letters refers to the interim charge because the references do not match ones on the property register.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you the sole owner of the property?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then its a restriction k and is useless to arrows.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

drydens are acting for their client who is....arrows.

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...