Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit Corp Harassment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4593 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I've become yet another victim of the Credit Corp bandwagon recently.

Thankfully I've found this forum which has provided a great deal of help,

however I was wondering if some one who has been put through the CCG mill could advise me on my next steps.

 

To give you a bit of background to my situation;

I lived in Sydney for 4 years until 2007 when I came back to England to live.

I had a credit card in Australia too.

In the UK I am director of a small public limited company that I run with my girlfriend who is a director too.

 

Earlier today I received an email from Credit Corp asking me to call them.

They gave no details, did not specifically mention debt, simply asked for me to call their Sydney office.

 

 

Somehow they've managed to find my email address, possibly from an ex-colleague in Australia,

however I don't believe they have my phone number or home address.

They are obviously trying to chase up a debt but I was hesitant to make contact as I didn't want it to be seen as an admission.

 

I then received a second email asking me to call.

Again, no specific mention of debt, however this time they gave the address of my accountant

and asked if they could send some documents through to that address.

As I own a limited company I assume they found his details listed on Companies House.

 

 

I have yet to reply but obviously I don't want them to send details to my accountant,

nor do I want them calling him.

 

 

More of a concern is that if they found my details, they will also find my girlfriends

and her family and I really don't want them involved.

 

So my question is.

Should I make contact and find out exactly what I'm supposedly accused of.

By doing so, I expect they will stop trying to track my phone number and address

and hopefully won't hassle my girlfriend, her family or our accountant.

Or,

should I ignore them and see what happens?

 

 

My concern is that eventually they will find my address, hassle my girlfriend

and family and start some sort of court proceedings.

I really don't want that!

 

My gut says ignore them,

but my head says find out exactly what they want,

then see if its statute barred and officially dispute it with the FOS.

 

 

I was thinking that I could provide an International private post box address.

That might as least prevent them from finding my actual adress..

 

Any help would be much appreciated. I'm losing sleep over this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be statute barred you need 6 years from your last due payment. There are other issues though and you should look at the web site here http://www.creditcorp.net.au/ and look at the licence link. Lots of help and advise here.

 

Also if you havent already have a read of this thread. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?265807-More-AUS-debt-being-chased-in-the-UK

 

Hope that helps some.

 

BTW if it was me and it might be soon :-) i would make them work hard for every bit of info. Do you have social network sites like face book etc? If so thats how they find most people

Link to post
Share on other sites

Earlier today I received an email from Credit Corp asking me to call them. They gave no details, did not specifically mention debt, simply asked for me to call their Sydney office.
Ignore for now, they are on a fishing trip.

 

Make them contact you by snail mail. if they've checked your details through Companies House they can use your registered address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, I don't think they have my home address, just where my business is registered at. I think thats all they can get from Companies House. From what I understand they need to be able to contact me at my home address? Should I just reply saying that the address they gave me (my limited company's address ) is not my home address and further, I'm not in the habit of giving out my own personal phone number and house details, to random strangers who contact me via email? Good approach or not advisable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks cerberus, your advice is reassuring.

 

Just a quick question. Can they initiate court proceedings without a known address? My gut feeling is that they cannot, but if they have the address where my company is registered, then is that all that they need?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A summons can be sent to your Company address yes.

 

There are only a couple of cases I've come across on CAG where Creditcorp have attempted to bring proceedings in the UK & both of those are still ongoing. There is a little matter of jurisdiction to overcome as an Oz court has declared that they don't have jurisdiction to hear a case under UK law so it should follow that a UK court doesn't have jurisdiction to hear a case under Oz law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks cerberus.

 

I'm tempted to give my residential address so that at least i can respond/dispute the case rather than having a court summons issued to my company address without my knowledge. But then im only giving them more ammunition.

 

Also ive read the australian debt collection guidelines which specify that they need to positively identify me as the alleged owner of the debt. Only then can they release details of the debt itself, otherwise I guess it could be deemed a breach of privacy. Today i receieved an email with some top level details of the debt. However at no point have I confirmed my identity in full. Which begs the question, are they breaching guidelines releasing this info without confirming my identity? What would constitue positive identification?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read somewhere (maybe on credit corp troubles site) that they need to have your permission to send account details via e-mail or they are in breach of privacy. Maybe credit corp trouble wll give advise on this

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they start court proceedings they would still have to get around the jurisdition issue that is being tested now in a thread in the legal forum. Seems to me that Stevens Drake start proceedings in the hope that people get so scared they make an offer to pay up. We have seen it happen on these forums. No one seems to be able to find a single case where judgment was awarded for a case that was defended.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was following dockers thread which seemed to be quite advanced. I think he actually got a court summons from Steve Drake, although it all seemed to go quiet as the date approached. Maybe a gagging order. I'd love to know what happened though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

You should have taken the VERY good advice given to you early on and IGNORED all communication from them. They were indeed fishing to see if they got a bite. If they cannot open up any channel of communication they will NOT take any action as they will have no idea what your personal circumstances are and won't risk court fees/costs on speculative action particularly if it's complex.

 

All the actions of these parasites are designed to draw you into dialogue. If they cannot do that they are stymied and they WILL go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...