Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

EGG Share Trading - Any Thoughts ?


gemster
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5800 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Never one for easy questions (- see my thread on RBS !)

 

Egg Share Trading - my mum is taking them to court over a dispute on buying and selling shares and consolidations. They owe her £2600, and they have frozen her share trading account and it has remained frozen for 3 years, leading to some spectacular loss of gaining some real golden profits, as the shares in have gone up so much, and unfortunately back down in that time frame.

 

We believe that Egg have closed their share trading venture and it's transferred to someone else which makes us think they can't unfreeze it?.

 

Egg have acknowledged our claim and have 28 days from 11/09/06.

 

What does everyone think? can we go on and claim loss of profit from the shares in the frozen account?, can they freeze an account indefinately?

 

I know they are a tough cookie looking at the bank charges nightmare people are facing with them.

 

Any suggestions appreciated.

HSBC - Owed £1315, settled at £1150 - 08/06

First National Tricity Fiance - Owed - not sure ? DPL sent 20/09/06

Alliance & Leicester - Owed £595 - Moneyclaim started 20/09/06

HSBC for Dad - Owed £1500 - Moneyclaim started 20/09/06

Capital One - Owed £495, Settlement Rejected £195, LBA sent 12/09/06

Barclays for Dad - Owed £3200, LBA sent 12/09/06

SPML & Blemain Finance for Mum & Dad - Awaiting Statements could be huge !

 

 

Failure is not an option ! - NASA

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is rather long winded - but it had to do with a consolidation of shares. Egg forgot to update their system upon a share consolidation, which meant that everyone who had those shares ended up with 10 times their money.

 

As a bank error, we took the half the money out of the account, Egg still did not update the account.

 

They then discovered their error and tried to get the money back from us. Including reversing some trades we had made with the other half, two days after making them and emptying the cash in the account. We queried that as it was not our fault that they made a mistake we wouldn't be prepared to give them the half we got out.

 

They said that the company who issued the consolidation never informed the market of the consolidation until one day after it occured. This was a lie and we obtained written proof that Egg were informed correctly, they didn't act. They then froze the accounts with some existing trades intact (we know we still have these shares as we receive annual accounts, reports, etc.

 

They then tried to pursue through solicitors quoting 'the law of mistake', Shoosmiths Solicitors (if anyone has had dealings with these people before in other contexts will know these people do not ever ever ever ever give up until they have their money). We challenged them with what I explained above, over the course of the three years we have various people from Shoosmiths try and make something of this, but when challenged fall silent. We went through solicitors ourselves, who came up with a counter for 'the law of mistake'.

 

We wrote three solicitors letters to Shoosmiths and heard nothing.

 

We asked again and again and again for a conclusion of this matter or at least for our account to be unfrozen but have heard nothing. So to end the matter we are attempting to take Egg to court for the other half of the money and to try and get our account unfrozen.

 

Help

HSBC - Owed £1315, settled at £1150 - 08/06

First National Tricity Fiance - Owed - not sure ? DPL sent 20/09/06

Alliance & Leicester - Owed £595 - Moneyclaim started 20/09/06

HSBC for Dad - Owed £1500 - Moneyclaim started 20/09/06

Capital One - Owed £495, Settlement Rejected £195, LBA sent 12/09/06

Barclays for Dad - Owed £3200, LBA sent 12/09/06

SPML & Blemain Finance for Mum & Dad - Awaiting Statements could be huge !

 

 

Failure is not an option ! - NASA

Link to post
Share on other sites

My memory fails me but there was somethng in the papers the other week about this...I think the conclusion was that they couldn't just take the mistaken money out of your account without your permission, but also that you couldn't take it either, though I'm not sure if that was a moral or legal consideration!

 

What was your solicitor's counter argument, out of interest?

 

If you took out half of the mistaken money, how does that compare to what you could have made in profits if you'd been about to effect the trades etc, is it a big difference?

 

If the total amount is less than £5000 then it would go to Small Claims where you would not have to pay costs so you'd have little to lose...You would then I suppose describe how you have een prevented from taking your money and also if you're claiming the other half of the mistake, that argument against the law of mistake. If you're trying to claim for losses, money that you might have made in profit, then you'd have to be very careful and have proof that you could have made that money...Not sure how you'd show that it likely that you would have done that...Can you not get advice from your solicitor over this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Our solicitor is very unsure of what to do - they have said basically it will cots you more for us to represent you than you would win. I don't think we've got the best solicitor !.

 

Their argument for 'law of mistake' is bascially that Egg's mistakes have meant that we are out of pocket and therefore, we can claim back compensation accordingly.

 

The profit from the shares, I know would be speculative, but we can prove the prices went up and even if we sold out half way up the rise it would equal well over £5000.

 

To be honest, we really want the matter settled and I know it is not a clear cut case, but we want the account unfrozen, I don't know if this affects the credit score or not?, but that money has also missed out on interest for the last three years.

 

Egg are just ignoring us, which I don't think they can do. So we'll try small claims and see how we get on.

HSBC - Owed £1315, settled at £1150 - 08/06

First National Tricity Fiance - Owed - not sure ? DPL sent 20/09/06

Alliance & Leicester - Owed £595 - Moneyclaim started 20/09/06

HSBC for Dad - Owed £1500 - Moneyclaim started 20/09/06

Capital One - Owed £495, Settlement Rejected £195, LBA sent 12/09/06

Barclays for Dad - Owed £3200, LBA sent 12/09/06

SPML & Blemain Finance for Mum & Dad - Awaiting Statements could be huge !

 

 

Failure is not an option ! - NASA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...