Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
    • Well naturally if you want to maintain your outrage, and retain something to bitch about, then arguing about the level of your fixed monthly DD is the way to go. You are of course perfectly free to ignore the easy solution.
    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ATOS say fit for work. Since then I've been in hospital. HELP!


BlurredFX
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4588 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

I am quite a awkward "stick" and was hoping for some help.

 

In brief, I attended an ATOS Medical and a couple of months later I received a letter from DWP saying ESA has been stopped. That was towards the end of July. I was getting worse by this point.

 

Two weeks ago, I was admitted to hospital with the symptoms I had been suffering from - and have been there ever since. (I have managed to escape for a couple of hours today (escorted of course)).

 

It turns out I have been previously misdiagnosed, and having had a number of CT scans and what not I am being treated for a far more serious illness.

 

Am I correct in thinking that I need to get the GL24 back as soon as possible? Is it possible to make the appeal over the 'phone?

 

What type of info do I need to put on the GL24? Do I need to reference it to every question in the "Limited capability for work questionnaire"? Does my in-patient status have much of a bearing on these things?

 

I have done my best to read around these forums (prior to admission and also today), so please do forgive me if I have missed something, but my faculties are not at their best.

 

Thanks for any help,

 

Blurred:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

An appeal has to be in writing. However, being in hospital is usually good cause for submitting a late appeal. You don't need to go over everything on the GL24, it results in a quicker overturn if you can. But as long as you can give basic grounds for why you disagree, they will accept it as duly made and log it, putting your ESA back into payment pending the outcome (assuming you were turned down because the result of the assessment said you had no limited capacity for work).

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The above post is correct. Your appeal is about how you were at the time that you failed the assessment.

 

Whatever has happened since is of no concern to the appeal or to the DWP or even the Tribunal.

If you were found fit for work then the argument is that on that date, the DWP got it wrong.

 

If things have taken a nosedive healthwise since then, you can apply for a review or maybe even close down the original claim and submit another claim with the new info. However you might have another ATOS medical.

 

I had a similar situation and ended up in hospital for a a month and a half. I closed down my original claim that I failed as I was finding the appealing bit too stressful. I made a fresh claim, had another ATOS assessment and was put in the support group.

Edited by ANDYANDFLO
Link to post
Share on other sites

Any deterioriation or change in illness since the date of the decision to refuse you ESA will not be taken into consideration by the appeal. However if you have obtained supporting evidence from medical diagnostic testing after the decision which shows the illness you had at the time of the decision was misdiagnosed, this is very relevent information which will be considered.

 

There is a difference between having a different illness/suffering worse symptoms and a misdiagnosis.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't know that!

 

One of my conditions, the one that makes walking almost impossible, was diagnosed as arthritis and old age by my GP. Nearly a year later, after being taken into A&E it was found that I had been suffering from Periphial Vascular Disease, and had emergency surgery to remove three bloods clots in one leg, hoping that that would solve the problem, if not the right leg at the hip would have had to come off.

 

I was put in the support group for my other problems, but if they had have diagnosed the leg problems properly, my original claim would have had a different result.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The diagnosis makes a difference if it's a terminal illness with a limited life expectancy. It's not clear from the OP whether or not that is the case.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Erika above seems to think that a misdiagnosis is important in an ESA claim.

It's nothing to do with what you can and can't do it seems - that's how I saw it. No different to being told that you have a chesty cough for 6 months only to find out that is actually lung cancer and have 4 months to live.

 

The diagnosis is different but the abilities still remain the same, yet for lung cancer with life expected under 6 months, you would go straight into the support group.

 

Sorry Erika, I didn't see your reply - and we were both on the same wavelenth it seems - wierd!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

Managed to sneek out to McDonalds in order to check up. Thanks for all the feedback - my major concern is the fact that I also receive Mortgage Interest Support - and if I lose that, it is a major blow!!

 

I understand that the appeal must relate to the time of the ATOS medical, so I will avoid going on about what has happened since too much.

 

(assuming you were turned down because the result of the assessment said you had no limited capacity for work).

your assumption is correct

 

However if you have obtained supporting evidence from medical diagnostic testing after the decision which shows the illness you had at the time of the decision was misdiagnosed, this is very relevent information which will be considered.

 

There is a difference between having a different illness/suffering worse symptoms and a misdiagnosis.

Supporting evidence at this stage is a little hopeful, though I am sure it will be forthcoming in the next couple of weeks. How do you suggest I bring the mis-diagnosis into the letter?

 

How about if I was to write something along the lines of "at the time of my medical, I was diagnosed with XXX, however, more thorough investigation (as a hospital inpatient) has since diagnosed me with YYYYY. The relevance of this is that the tiredness, lack of energy, inability to focus, hold a conversation, or even walk for 200m was a minor side effect of my pain killers. (reasons to change my responses to questions??).

 

I suppose I will have to go through the GL24 and see how I would have answered had i been aware of my condition?? Is that the correct course of action?

 

Thanks everybody for your help on this, I am slowly getting an idea of the way to progress!!

 

Blurred:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The diagnosis makes a difference if it's a terminal illness with a limited life expectancy. It's not clear from the OP whether or not that is the case.

 

Thanks for your concern, but thankfully, as far as I know, I am not dying!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

@ Erica & Nyst; The initial diagnosis is looked up in the DWP handbook of medical stuff.

 

This gives them a very general opinion of how your condition fits into the ESA frame work i.e. if you meet any of the special rules, where you are likely to meet descriptors and if further assessment is needed.

 

A change in diagnosis may shift the goalposts giving some of your arguments more weight and others less in their eyes. It may also as Erica says give you eligibility for one of the special groups which give automatic qualification to ESA.

 

Sorry I could be talking complete gubbins here but it's hard to simplify.

 

@ Original posting

 

Surely this should be a case of appealing the original decision then chucking in a new claim/change of circumstances for the deterioration/new condition?

 

Hospitalisation = an automatic LCW decision for the duration of the stay http://www.newcastle.gov.uk/core.nsf/a/wr_esalimitedcap

 

So whilst the OP may win the appeal and may be able to use the misdiagnosis to their advantage. Surely the fact that they now would be automatically considered eligible for ESA needs reporting and a new judgement by the DWP made based on the current facts - the new diagnosis + deterioration + hospitalisation?

 

The appeal against the 1st decision will be ongoing until it's decided. Whilst the new evidence would require a new 2nd decision separate to the 1st. If successful in the 2nd decision you would get awarded ESA and also continue with the appeal against the 1st decision. Whilst if it was unsuccessful the 1st appeal would continue as is. You could also appeal the 2nd decision but I think the 6 month rule before a new claim could be submitted would be reset to 6 months from the date of the 2nd decision?

 

That's what I've read but I could be wrong?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Phew!! I know less now. Why do things have to be so damn complicated?

I never knew about the hospital bit - automatically being treated as not fit for work.

 

Things are only as complicated as you perceive them to be.

 

In reality very complex things when broken down/explained in their individual parts are really a miss mash of extremely simple entities!

 

Have you recovered from last year?

 

Whilst your multiple logins/personalities did highlight some glaring issues with ESA etc! It had rather a bad effect on those who struggle through their illnesses to help others on this board!

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Speedfreak is spot on

  • Confused 1

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks one and all for the feedback, it is providing much info and relieving a good amount of stress!!

 

Surely this should be a case of appealing the original decision then chucking in a new claim/change of circumstances for the deterioration/new condition?

 

I have never heard of "a new claim/change of circumstances for the deterioration/new condition?". Where would I get one of these? If someone lets me know the form ID, I will download it. This form seems the most sensible, though clearly I have no experience of such. I was having nightmares about getting so far, then having to restart the claim, and then whether I would get the MIS I have been getting!

 

@speedfreak, the link you provided goes to the Newcastle search page. Is there another way you could post it? Ta.

 

What does LCW mean? Internet searches are no help...

 

So, my plan of action is to fill in the appeal form and get that off asap (money running out fast - well friends and family money!!).

 

Then I will consider the change of circumstances for deterioration form, if we think that is the best idea?!?!?

 

Thanks guys, help is much appreciated.

 

Does my plan seem sensible??

 

Blurred:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

LCW = limited capability for work.

 

I think what Speedfreek is trying to say (using the link) is:

 

ESA will have far fewer exemptions - for patients undergoing certain types of chemotherapy, pregnant women where there is a risk to health, who are in the later stage of pregnancy or who have recently given birth, carriers of certain infectious diseases or hospital in-patients.

 

http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2008/07/24/108915/Employment-and-Support-Allowance-how-it-will-work.htm

 

The Newscastle Gov site is being odd with me too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Nyst the Newcastle site seams to be undergoing some reorganisation since I posted that link.

 

There's a box for hospitalisation on the ESA50 form see here http://www.nawra.org.uk/Documents/Cardiff_Mar_10/Fit%20for%20Purpose%20%20A%20Guide%20to%20Completing%20the%20ESA50.pdf

 

That's a pre April 20i1 form so some questions have changed on the new ESA50 forms but most of it stands.

 

@ Blurred yes that plan seams very sensible.

 

Get the appeal on the 1st decision in, then make a new 2nd application for ESA citing the deterioration/change of condition/hospitalisation. (Apply in the normal way as you did the 1st either by telephone or form)

 

Basically in order for them to consider your new circumstances you have to put in a new claim. This claim will kick off a new round of assessment based on the new information.

 

See here for what I'm talking about

 

http://www.cpag.org.uk/cro/wrb/wrb216/ESA_appeals.htm

 

Other changes and clarifications

 

DWP guidance states that where a claimant is already being paid ESA, any new claim for ESA will be refused, unless the claimant has a new or deteriorating condition, in which case a new assessment phase will begin and the claimant will be subject to the WCA again.[Footnote 7] Where a claimant who is being paid ESA pending appeal experiences a change of circumstances which means they can be treated as having limited capability for work (e.g. as a hospital inpatient), a new assessment phase will begin.

 

A lot people think that their current appeal will consider facts after the original decision and during the period from that date until the appeal is heard at tribunal. That's wrong. They may consider something if you can convince them it was relevant on or before the date of that decision. That's a big may! So whilst Erikas' suggestion on the change of diagnosis may get accepted for your current appeal and be of benefit. Nothing else will be considered until you put in a new claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks guys, I'm still in hospital and have been out of the game for a couple of weeks - having various holes put in me, and the usual type of stuff! It's amazing how it takes it out of you :(

 

I will get on with appeal 1 over the weekend - my only concern about the above is that I am currently receiving MIS (Mortgage Interest Support) which is covering my mortgage. If I start a new claim, will I have to wait again (3 or 9 months) for the MIS to start coming through again??

 

I will have a read of those links - they look very useful at first glance!

 

I will certainly try the mis-diagnosis as being relevant - it explains a whole load of problems, so it is worth a try at least!

 

Thanks for your on-going support everyone! I will post back next week with an update!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, well, I have sent a letter off, explaining the situation asking for permission to appeal. If I am given permission, I will send them more details...

 

But in the mean time, I am filling in a new claim form, and will be enclosing notes from the hospitals I have been in to verify the story.

 

I think this is the best course of action - if anyone thinks different, let me know, so I have time to possibly correct it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You also need to carry on sending in fit notes to receive ESA.

Good point!

 

Right, I have got that form off, and now I need to start the new application, starting from when I went into Hospital. What do I need to put on this form?

 

Someone mentioned that as I am applying for ESA having just been kicked off ESA (by ATOS), there must be good reason. How do I go about demonstrating such good reason? Is simply being admitted to hospital sufficient?

 

Many thanks

 

Blurred:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...