Jump to content


Cabots playing silly beggars


mrsfoot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4628 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Friend's husband has an ex. She has been buying stuff online frm catalogues.

She has then left the debts to mount..cos they are all in friends husbands' name. He is now being chased by cabot.

We have cca'd and got the usual response "we have asked for the agreement but the catalogue are having problems finding it. In the meantime we are still askin you to make payments"

Now..I know they can't chase the debt whilst no agreement is in place (or has this changed?) The cca had the usual non acknowledgemet of debt...and icluded a statement in regarding the account being fraudulent but they still write.

I suppose I just want to know if anythin has changed in the cca rules

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Friend's husband has an ex. She has been buying stuff online frm catalogues.

She has then left the debts to mount..cos they are all in friends husbands' name. He is now being chased by cabot.

We have cca'd and got the usual response "we have asked for the agreement but the catalogue are having problems finding it. In the meantime we are still askin you to make payments"

Now..I know they can't chase the debt whilst no agreement is in place (or has this changed?) The cca had the usual non acknowledgemet of debt...and icluded a statement in regarding the account being fraudulent but they still write.

I suppose I just want to know if anythin has changed in the cca rules

 

This has changed.... even whilst not responding to the s77/s78 they can still do everything bar getting judgement in court (carey vs hsbc / Mcguffick vs rbos)

 

If the account was taken out after april 2007 then they dont even need the CCA with the prescribed terms to get enforcement in court as s127(3) doesnt apply post april 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Right..thanks for the update and pointers..CAGgers are brilliant!!

 

Yeah they have informed the company that the account was set up fraudulently..they wont have any of it...I understand why...but its a genuine case.

 

Thanks guys xx

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There must be a formal complaint made to CABOT and The OC

this is a genuine dispute and therefore continuing attempting to

collect breaches OFT guidance, so a report to OFT as soon as possible.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Right..thanks for the update and pointers..CAGgers are brilliant!!

 

Yeah they have informed the company that the account was set up fraudulently..they wont have any of it...I understand why...but its a genuine case.

 

Thanks guys xx

 

Problem is I would imagine they get a lot of this "its not my account" etc, its worth a complaint and if you can give any evidence of how its been taken out fraudulently I would provide it... better to be proactive in this instance I feel.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...