Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
    • Thousands of Chinese companies are making synthetic opioids and shipping them around the world.View the full article
    • Are these the important pages I need to upload ? 1.  pages 1-4 are court form 10a 2.  2 pages of the CCA agreement  3.  Default notice from NewDay, 22/02/20 4.   Lowell letter stating they own debt ,     Dated 16/11/20 5. Unheaded letter also dated 16/11/20 from NewDay saying they assigned “all of the respective rights etc,”  to Lowell on 23/10/20 I make this 9 relevant pages from what I can see   ( all other pages are statements/default notes and lots of FCA info sheets) just needing your confirmation in advance as I don’t want to send over pages that are not required thank you  UCM      
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

It's Lowells and Barclaycard - SB'ed question. *** Lowell Agree Stat Barred - SUCCESS ***


jon888999
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4339 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't want to say who yet, but a DCA has been pestering me about an account that the last payment date was 23rd August 2005. Confirmed by the statements they've sent me recently. So can somebody confirm that as i've not paid or acknowledged the debt since then that I can send the stat barred letter on Tuesday.

 

Although i've not moved the OC decided to start writing to me at a relatives address, those letters were returned, then they sold it to a dca who kept writing to the same address all were returned unopened. Early this year they wrote to me at the correct address, I sent the prove it letter. They replied with statements and an application form with no prescribed terms so I said get me an enforceable agreement or get lost! Had a few grovelling letters eg pay 30%. All replies to them have been marked "I do not acknowledge any debt to your company or any company you claim to represent" Also contains PPI and Penalty charges, although not enough to settle the alleged debt.

 

So should I post the letter monday or leave it till Tuesday?

 

Thanks for your help.

Jon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, if they didnt send any letters recorded delivery, it keeps the clock ticking a little longer, as you dont recall receiving them

 

They've never sent any of the letters recorded, the ones i've sent recently have been by recorded.

How do you mean it keeps the clock ticking a little longer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They've never sent any of the letters recorded, the ones i've sent recently have been by recorded.

How do you mean it keeps the clock ticking a little longer?

 

No acknowledgment.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

This won't be statute barred until 25th September - as this will be the first missed payment (I believe) - unless the letters you have sent recorded acknowledge this debt. in which case you will have reset the clock?

 

All letters i've sent them have been disputing the debt.

Last payment made was on 23rd August 2005 so I thought that, that was the last time I acknowledged the debt and that was when the 6 years run from.

I think i've confused myself more by asking!!

Thanks

Jon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

What did you say in the letters you sent ?

 

If in the letters you sent told them you do not acknowledge the debt, it will, then, be up to the creditor/dca to prove that the debt is not Statute Barred - either by proving that you made a payment towards it, or acknowledged it, in writing, during a six year period of your last payment/acknowledgement.

 

Equally, once you have told the creditor/dca that you will not be making any further payments towards the debt, because it is statute barred (the ONLY reason you need give) then that creditor/dca should cease all further attempts at pursuing that debt:

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

What did you say in the letters you sent ?

 

If in the letters you sent told them you do not acknowledge the debt, it will, then, be up to the creditor/dca to prove that the debt is not Statute Barred

- either by proving that you made a payment towards it, or acknowledged it, in writing, during a six year period of your last payment/acknowledgement.

 

Equally, once you have told the creditor/dca that you will not be making any further payments towards the debt,

because it is statute barred (the ONLY reason you need give) then that creditor/dca should cease all further attempts at pursuing that debt:

 

Thanks All letters have been headed " I do not acknowledge any debt" Definitely not acknowledged debt since 2005/

From post 1,

Although i've not moved the OC decided to start writing to me at a relatives address,

those letters were returned, then they sold it to a dca who kept writing to the same address

all were returned unopened.

 

Early this year they wrote to me at the correct address, I sent the prove it letter.

 

They replied with statements and an application form with no prescribed terms so I said get me an enforceable agreement or get lost!

 

Had a few grovelling letters eg pay 30%.

 

All replies to them have been marked "I do not acknowledge any debt to your company or any company you claim to represent"

 

Also contains PPI and Penalty charges, although not enough to settle the alleged debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it they defaulted you and marked your file with the cra's and there's no CCJ.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it they defaulted you and marked your file with the cra's and there's no CCJ.

Not sure because it doesn't show on my credit file and any default notice would have been sent to the wrong address so would have been returned unopened.

No CCJ has ever been mentioned and doesn't show on my credit file, so I assume not.

I know the last payment date was the 23rd of August 2005 as the statement they've sent me shoWs that. Also agrees with my records/memory.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure because it doesn't show on my credit file and any default notice would have been sent to the wrong address so would have been returned unopened.

No CCJ has ever been mentioned and doesn't show on my credit file, so I assume not.

 

Good stuff :-)

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

So just to clarify i'm 110 % certain i've not acknowledged this debt since 23rd august 2005. Mainly because the OC decided to write to the wrong address.

If that is the case is it definitely statute barred on the 24th? My opinion is that it is, but some others think that it won't be until the 23rd of September.

 

Really want to send the first of my statute barred letters! But want to be sure first.

Will have to wait another 2 years + for the others as the ones who wrote to the proper address got token payments until I found this site and stood up to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Unfortunately it's not as simple as last payment (unless the payment was made AFTER the account was defaulted/terminated)

The stat barred clock starts at the point of "accrual of cause of action" which is the date when they can start enforcing the debt after you default on payment.

It's a bit of a murky area, so be careful here.

Much depends on the T&Cs...eg If your T&C's state that if you miss 1 months payments then a default notice will be issued etc, then cause of action is when an (unpaid) default notice expires as at that point they can enforce. If, on t'ther hand, the T&C's state that the full balance becomes payable immediately a payment is missed, then cause of action accrues the day after the first missed payment. And so on.

 

Procrastination is key here...

 

Does this debt still show on your credit file, or if it does, what's the stated default date?

 

kind regards,

 

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Unfortunately it's not as simple as last payment (unless the payment was made AFTER the account was defaulted/terminated)

The stat barred clock starts at the point of "accrual of cause of action" which is the date when they can start enforcing the debt after you default on payment.

It's a bit of a murky area, so be careful here.

Much depends on the T&Cs...eg If your T&C's state that if you miss 1 months payments then a default notice will be issued etc, then cause of action is when an (unpaid) default notice expires as at that point they can enforce. If, on t'ther hand, the T&C's state that the full balance becomes payable immediately a payment is missed, then cause of action accrues the day after the first missed payment. And so on.

 

Procrastination is key here...

 

Does this debt still show on your credit file, or if it does, what's the stated default date?

 

kind regards,

 

Elsa x

 

Elsa

 

You have raised an interesting point and something that I am not too clear on.

 

I defaulted on my debts in Summer of 2006, when checking my credit file I noticed that the defaults were registered between 3 months and 6 months later and in one case over 12 months later.

 

Of the couple that have not been settled and have been sold on to DCA's the default has been registered by the DCA's after they have bought the account which means the default is registered nearly 3 years after the last payment.

 

In such a case is the 6 years for Statute Barred from the date the default was registered by the original creditor for example:

 

Payment on 01/06/06 missed

 

Default noticed issue 01/07/06 giving until 15/07/06 to pay or default registered.

 

No payment made - passed to collections

 

Default registered by OC with CRAs on 01/12/06

 

Account sold to DCA 01/12/08 - Credit Report shows account settled with OC on 01/12/08

 

DCA writes "payup or else" letter.

 

B40 - says no credit agreement from OC - account in dispute

 

NO Default Notice received by B40 from DCA

 

Credit report shows default registered by DCA with CRAs on 01/04/09

 

In this case is the 6 years up on 02/12/2012 or 02/04/2015

Edited by Blondie40
Link to post
Share on other sites

Elsa

 

You have raised an interesting point and something that I am not too clear on.

 

I defaulted on my debts in Summer of 2006, when checking my credit file I noticed that the defaults were registered between 3 months and 6 months later and in one case over 12 months later.

 

Of the couple that have not been settled and have been sold on to DCA's the default has been registered by the DCA's after they have bought the account which means the default is registered nearly 3 years after the last payment.

 

In such a case is the 6 years for Statute Barred from the date the default was registered by the original creditor for example:

 

Payment on 01/06/06 missed

 

Default noticed issue 01/07/06 giving until 15/07/06 to pay or default registered.

 

No payment made - passed to collections

 

Default registered by OC with CRAs on 01/12/06

 

Account sold to DCA 01/12/08 - Credit Report shows account settled with OC on 01/12/08

 

DCA writes "payup or else" letter.

 

B40 - says no credit agreement from OC - account in dispute

 

NO Default Notice received by B40 from DCA

 

Credit report shows default registered by DCA with CRAs on 01/04/09

 

In this case is the 6 years up on 02/12/2012 or 02/04/2015

 

Hi, I've asked maroondevo52 to look and give us his guidance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware irrespective of T&Cs and CRAs registration.

If a lender allows time to pass without receiving any payment an action for recovery may become barred.

 

Under the Limitations Act 1980 the time limits are

  • in simple contracts, 6 years
  • in contracts under seal, 12 years.

If the debtor acknowledges the debt in writing or makes a part payment within the original limitation period, then the time limits start to run again from the date of acknowledgment or the date of payment.

 

Even though the lender may be barred from pursuing recovery, a debtor may decide to pay the debt after the expiry of the time limits. Because of this you should allow a debt which is otherwise statute-barred if the personal representatives pay the debt and you receive evidence that the payment has been made.

 

The above instructions do not apply to debts in Scotland. Under Scottish law, if a lender allows time to pass without receiving any payment an action for recovery may become barred under the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973. These debts are completely extinguished and cannot be enforced.

 

The above is applicable unless a CCJ is attained without your knowledge within the above periods.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I know, the default date matters not a jot, well it will stay on your credit file for 6 years but what that has to do with the debt being stat barred I don't know.

 

The Limitations Act 1980 states that when the following conditions are met then the debt cannot be pursue through the courts.

The conditions are:-

 

That the creditor has not taken court action against you, eg CCJ, AND

You have not made any payments on the debt over the last 6 years,AND

During the years, you haven't written to the creditor acknowledging that owe them money.

 

Thats the way I see it, they can whack a default on your credit report long after your last payment or acknowledgement, so they think the stat barred clock starts from there, I don't think so.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first thing to stress is that loans and credit card balances are rarely if ever totally ‘written off’. They may become legally noncollectable, but this does not stop the lender from writing to you asking for payment, nor does it stop the lender from selling your debt to Debt Collection Agencies (DCAs) to carry on the collection process . The underlying agreement (even if not legally enforceable) still applies together with the rights and duties of the two parties to the agreement. It also means that if the reason for the debt being noncollectable is ‘cured’ by the lender at some future date (e.g. they locate a copy of an enforceable agreement) the debt then becomes due together with all the arrears and charges from the date you ceased payments. This of course would not be the case if the time between a last payment (or admission of liability for the debt) and the debt again becoming collectible exceeds 6 years, when the Limitation Act 1980 debars the lender from pursuing the debt.

 

Andy

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4339 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...