Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4630 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

We had a judgment against us for xxxx amount from Southern Water, which has been paid. We even have the bill showing this amount as a credit.

 

Since all this trouble, we set up a direct debt and have been paying the new bills via this method. However, when we rang initially to set this up, we were told that there was another very old outstanding amount showing on our account, which we believe is incorrect. Looking at all the payments we've made, we have actually overpaid and believe that if we did owe this money, this is also paid.

 

However, yesterday we received a warrant of execution, which we are assuming is for this 'very old amount.' The warrant has the same claim number as the court papers for the previous amount, which is fully paid.

 

My husband rang Southern Water and the lady in the litigation department admitted the amount was wrong but only by £73 odd. Surely, that in itself is not allowed?

 

So my questions are, what are the laws and regulations on them issuing a warrant of execution under the guise of a judgment which is already paid?

 

If the judgment amount is showed as paid (which it is and does) then they would have to start a whole new court claim for the amount they believe we still owe wouldn't they?

 

If you have any legalise I could add into a letter of complaint in support of the above, I would be very grateful. Or if I'm completely wrong, can you set me straight.

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have received all the usual notifications prior to it having reached this stage. they should have:

1. sent you a bill for the alleged amount owed showing what period it covers, how much is owed.

2. if you did not acknowledge their requests for payment then they could apply for a CCJ for which you should have received a claim pack (to allow admission to the debt/a defence/counterclaim/payment proposal etc etc)

3. If you did not attend the hearing (which you couldn't if you did not know about it) they can then apply for a warrant of execution to the Judgment awarded by default (in that you did not attend a hearing and the Court ruled in your absence)

 

They cannot simply tag this debt onto a previous debt that has been satisfied.

You will need to write to Southern Water them asking:

 

1. what period the alleged amount owed covers

2. how much the alleged debt is for

 

Once you have that info you will be able to reconcile with the amounts you have paid, then if you disagree you will be able to challenge their action.

Always follow the Golden Rules. send all correspondence by signed for mail, only discuss it on the telephone if you can record the call and, most importantly refuse any Bailiff that will call any access to your home and do not ring them under any circumstances, there is no law that says you must speak with them so keep them at bay until you get everything together and get to look at this as a whole.

 

Southern Water appear often on cag and many battles have been won against them, can I ask how much they say is owed? reason being it has been known for the HCE firm they use to edge the debt up, by applying various dubious charges, to the £600 required to transfer up to the High Court and obtain a writ of Fi'Fa'.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your help Wonkey. I really appreciate it.

 

Your first paragraph is exactly what happened, everything was fine, all paperwork received and an offer to pay was made and accepted.

 

It's the fact that they have tagged another amount on that I was wondering about, I didn't think it was correct and you've cleared that up for me, thank you.

 

I guess I should try and suspend the warrant while I write my complaint letters?

 

As to the amount they say is owed, I don't have the paperwork in front me at the moment, but the warrant claims we owe around £510 and when we rang they said that amount was in fact wrong and it's £430 odd. That in itself must mean the warrant isn't valid surely?

 

Surely the amount they are saying we owe must be correct on the warrant at least by their records. Are they allowed to say "oh actually, you know what, we got that wrong. The amount should be xxxxxx sorry about that" Doesn't that invalidate the warrant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you been given the period this alleged debt covers? You need to write to them and get all they have said in Black and White, also ask them:

 

1, The date they issued a claim for the alleged debt

2. A copy of the CCJ to which they now claim to hold a warrant of execution.

 

Then use the Court reference number they have given you and file an application to set aside and a stay of execution.

They are going to have to convince the Court they had "forgotton to add the alleged amount owed to their initial application" and although you have paid what was asked of you in relation to that action" they thought they could just amend a court order to suit their purpose !!!!!!!!! They have a lot of explaining to do me thinks?

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way the vultures that handle enforcement for SW are clever in getting a sum of £430 to leap up to £600, then transfer to the High Court for writ of Fi'Fa'

so they can at least double the debt. So getting the paperwork in place swiftly is very important.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Wonkey, I have the original court claim together with the judgment and the sum total shows a figure of £768, which has been paid and I even have this exact amount showing as a credit on the next years's bill.

 

The amount owed covered up to end of March '09 and end of March '10. It shows as a credit on the bill April '10-March '11.

 

The warrant just says we haven't paid as we were ordered to, but we have. Every single penny and there is a DD in place now so this doesn't happen again.

 

Thanks again for your help, I really appreciate your time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sit tight an fight it, dont let them get to you.

 

About a montha go we were in the same place, we'd had a nasty-o-gram from Sherforce for a CCJ on an amount Southern Water couldnt actually explain. They tried to take the car and it was moved. After a lot of of heratache, frenzied calling around etc I spoke to a loveley guy at Verisona and although he couldnt help he gave some tips and pointed me in the right direction.

 

I filed an N244 to make them go away and then went to the Portsmouth CAB on London Road. They looked at the case, agreed that it stunk and their solicitor did some digging. Upon being confronted witht his Southern Water rolled over and said they had not only duplicated our account, but were applying out DD payments to another, third account. Its taken weeks to sort it but today after asking why nothing has been done they have again admitted their fault and corrected it all. The CCJ will be set aside tomorrow.

 

I really dont think that Southern Water are even fit to run a business let alone a utility as I've heard so many repeats of this mismanagement over the last weeks. We were driven out of our home because of these clowns and made to fear our property would be seized.

 

Oh, they offered me a £25 discont to say sorry.

 

Persist and it will come out in your favour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£250 would be more like compensation for all the stress and inconvenience they put you through and if that didn't come to the table they would be reported to the OFT swiftly.

 

Sherfarce from this site alone must realise they are being sent innacurate writs to enforce by SW and yet they still refuse to give people the chance to prove they do not owe the debt, it cannot be cost effective to continue with enforcement when they know the alleged debtor will fight SW and the chances of them getting their pound of flesh are slender.Then again I doubt SW even question the bill from Sherfarce they just pay up and add the costs to the rest of their "costs" used as an excuse to hike up our bills.

 

WD

 

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...