Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
    • Hmm, that's strange how they got my email then.  I assume the below is ok to send to DCBL, Nicky?  Hello, I am writing regarding our ongoing dispute and the upcoming court claim reference xxxxxxxx. To ensure fairness and transparency in our communications leading up to the court hearing, I request that you use postal mail exclusively for all further correspondence related to this claim. Please refrain from sending any communication or documents via email. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. If you have any questions or need clarification, please feel free to contact me via postal mail at the address provided above. Yours sincerely, xxxx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Social Housing law question


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4649 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello!

 

Mother, stepfather and brothers live in a 3 floor council house, an old building.

 

Heating for the entire property is basically, 1 small gas fire in the living room.

 

Someone suggested that its actually against the law for a council/housing assoc property to not have central heating, is this true?

 

The mother is on ESA, and the house has serious damp problems, which still have not yet been fixed.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone suggested that its actually against the law for a council/housing assoc property to not have central heating, is this true?

 

We have been in "social housing" for more than 30 years and follow this sort of thing fairly closely, the rights and duties of the tenants and the council or housing association but this is the first that I have heard of that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try the environmental health people if the house is damp but whats to stop your Family actually putting their hands in their pockets and buy more gas fires or portable electric fires and I dont know about it being against the law for housing association/council houses NOT to have central heating but I hope not after all 1000s of private renters home owners do not have CH I didnt have CH until I bought my last place and would really have liked the tax payer to fork out for it but no chance of that

 

Sorry but this is another post showing peoples sense of entitlement and inability to take some responsibility for their own environment.

 

If yiour family dont like where they are living then they can rent through the private sector and choose a property with CH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Short answer is no. Longer answer is that the Decent Homes Standard (which is a minimum standard that all HAs and LAs are expected to adhere to) requires a good degree of "thermal comfort" in the property. This standard is not enforced for breaches in it (it is more of a general target, than specifically on a tenant by tenant requirement), and obviously "thermal comfort" does not in and of itself require GCH.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try the environmental health people if the house is damp but whats to stop your Family actually putting their hands in their pockets and buy more gas fires or portable electric fires and I dont know about it being against the law for housing association/council houses NOT to have central heating but I hope not after all 1000s of private renters home owners do not have CH I didnt have CH until I bought my last place and would really have liked the tax payer to fork out for it but no chance of that

 

Sorry but this is another post showing peoples sense of entitlement and inability to take some responsibility for their own environment.

 

If yiour family dont like where they are living then they can rent through the private sector and choose a property with CH

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

There is absolutely nothing suggesting a sense of entitlement in my post, thank you very much, maybe you should learn to become more literate, at least past an "spot chased the ball" level, if you do so, then you are welcome to return and explain where this sense of entitlement appears.

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Edited by caledfwlch

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Short answer is no. Longer answer is that the Decent Homes Standard (which is a minimum standard that all HAs and LAs are expected to adhere to) requires a good degree of "thermal comfort" in the property. This standard is not enforced for breaches in it (it is more of a general target, than specifically on a tenant by tenant requirement), and obviously "thermal comfort" does not in and of itself require GCH.

 

Thankyou, just what I thought, the Shelter advisor was getting confused, unless the Welsh Senate is bringing something in.

 

She needs to focus on the damp issues at the moment anyway.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you brought the damp issues up via the formal complaints process? Could you name the HA please? (simply as I cannot advise anything that directly involves my employer). And - you are welcome.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you brought the damp issues up via the formal complaints process? Could you name the HA please? (simply as I cannot advise anything that directly involves my employer). And - you are welcome.

 

Tai Ceredigion is the HA.

 

They have been informed, many, many times. The Shelter advisor is now on the case, and is writing to them giving them a week or two, or Environmental Health will be involved. I believe the many, many phonecalls and meetings held regarding the damp is fair warning, and that Environmental Health should be contacted first.

 

It is serious enough, that a private Landlord would be prosecuted without a doubt, don't know what would happen with a HA though.

 

The walls in the kichen and hall are collapsing and cracking due to the damp, the walls are near black, the kitchen units are soggy, and wont remain clean, the sink unit has become completely detached from the wall. The double glazing windows which were fitted in the kitchen and leak are probably not helping either. Its not the best environment for the mother with her respiratory illnesses like COPD and my brothers Asthma.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Outrageous. Easy throw away comment for me to make, but I would be shocked if that happened in my HA. I would suggest escalating this to the TSA/Housing Ombudsman: http://www.tenantservicesauthority.org/server/show/ConWebDoc.16267

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Outrageous. Easy throw away comment for me to make, but I would be shocked if that happened in my HA. I would suggest escalating this to the TSA/Housing Ombudsman: http://www.tenantservicesauthority.org/server/show/ConWebDoc.16267

 

I have been telling her, and telling her to go right to the top on this, its beyond a joke. The HA has already been embarressed recently by some of its shortcomings, and unless they are poked with sharp pointy sticks they wont do anything.

 

I do not believe the Shelter advisor's letter will make any difference, only a phonecall from Environmental Health will make them jump. I believe that the damage is so severe, that it will take so long to fix, that they are going to have to be put up somewhere else, and have their meals paid for whilst repairs are made!

 

But then, thats my mum, how dare she feel a sense of entitlement in wanting a house thats not extremely dangerous and toxic to her health....

 

I think, if a judge were shown pictures of the kitchen, a HA officer could well find himself facing prosecution.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

MPs tend to be interested in this level of disrepair from a HA/LA as well by the way...

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

this is shocking and i would make sure you have photographic evidence of all the problems

 

Personally i wouldnt wait to get Enviromental Health involved i would be contacting them myself and requesting that they come out and inspect the property and you are given a copy of there findings.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

There is absolutely nothing suggesting a sense of entitlement in my post, thank you very much, maybe you should learn to become more literate, at least past an "spot chased the ball" level, if you do so, then you are welcome to return and explain where this sense of entitlement appears.

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Secondly you do have a sense of entitlement , you seem to expect there should be laws to give you the central heating just because you are in social housing when people who rent through the private sector have no legal right to central heating and people who buy often cant afford to install it.

 

However you have given more information about the problems in other posts and I would agree with others that the situation is deplorable, however the question still remains that if I gas fire is not enough to heat the house why your family have not bought electric fires or some other means of heating the house.

 

 

 

I take it you have approached

Link to post
Share on other sites

Secondly you do have a sense of entitlement , you seem to expect there should be laws to give you the central heating just because you are in social housing when people who rent through the private sector have no legal right to central heating and people who buy often cant afford to install it.

 

:roll:

 

Ceredigion Housing Association is a private sector company.

 

The County Council's housing stock was privatised in 2009.

 

Central heating provided by the Association would have to be funded by a private loan, not by the government and guess what: This was already supposed to have happened.

 

I therefore surmise that caledfwlch is looking for a way to force them to stick to their promise, a pathetically naive ambition if I may be so bold as to say so.

 

:horn:

 

P.S.

 

Tenants vote to divorce themselves from the councils, because a good deal of time and money is spent to convince them that these sort of benefits are not available from the public sector, not because the public sector is perceived to be a soft touch.

Edited by perplexity
PS
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...