Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can my dad return his laptop? Please please help


sammybizzle
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4649 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My dad spent £800 on a laptop in March.Illogical because he does not need a laptop that is so expensive. Recently he had to take it in because the harddrive was damaged and a new one was put it.

 

If he still has the receipt, can he take the laptop in and ask for a full refund if he is willing to spend maybe 400 on a new laptop in that same store.

 

I know on their website it talks about a 7 day period for returns, but can he get a refund if it was bought months ago?..If so, what should I get him to say ?

 

Thanks Very much

Link to post
Share on other sites

at that price, I'm sure it must be a very nice laptop.

I'm afraid that he has no rights to return it and I'm afraid that I can't imagine even the most decent shop being prepared to take it back for a refund.

 

The only thing he could think about doing would be to sell it on eBay and get a cheaper one – but he will certainly lose some money on the sale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, of course. If there is nothing wrong with the laptop. He accepted a previous repair. There is no basis for asking the store to accept a secondhand computer and to make a full refund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unlikely as he has had it since March so has had four months out of the laptop. Realistically you would be looking at them repairing the laptop.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

who?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way forward with this would be if something's (currently) wrong with the laptop.... but you'd still have a battle on your hands to change it for something of less value and be refunded the difference.

 

As it's already had a repair for faulty hard drive in such a short space of time, I'd be reluctant to keep it myself to be honest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Sale of Goods Act (SOGA) provides a statutory right that products should be free from fault. for the first six months after purchase it is assumed any fault was there from the start, and so your dad's laptop, if faulty now (especially after repairs) would be viable for refund, replacement or repair.

 

If it is still faulty.

 

Have you asked him if it's faultless?

 

Ignore their 7 day period for returns, that only applies if you change your mind. If a product is faulty, they have a legal obligation to make reparations. Also ignore the fact their reciepts say they will forward such concerns to the product manufacturer - they do not have that right.

 

If there is anything still wrong with it then you have grounds to request a refund or replacement. Doesn't matter if you've had it for four months, or even five months and three weeks. Further, you do not have to prove a fault exists; they have to prove it does not (if they wish to challenge you).

 

After six months though, this changes.

 

The question is have you checked the laptop is fault free? The posts below seem to assume it is. If it is, then yes, there isn't much you can do, but if there actually is a fault with it then I for one would not accept a repair after it had already been repaired by them, and clearly to an unsatisfactory level...

 

Check the laptop bud, you never know.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...