Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

RLP Hounding me - what do I doAfter


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4650 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Can anyone help please? I received a fiscal fine for shoplifting in Boots, although I was ill at the time and not really aware of what was going on. Since then RLP have been hounding me with letters to pay in excess of four times what was taken even though the goods were undamaged. They have suggested I get a doctor to write to them explaining my condition and they were consider the circumstances but cannot promise they will still not pursue me for the money. I can't afford to pay and I am terrified of my family finding out. So far i have managed to intercept the letters before the rest of the family but they come in envelopes with RLP - Retail Loss Prevention in big red letters stamped on them. I am at the end of my tether and don't know where to turn. Some days I feel almost suicidal. Please, please advise me - I don't want them to take me to court but don't know how to stop them.

 

Debbie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have moved your post to a more appropriate section of the forum.

 

In the meantime, you may like to have a good read of some other threads here, and see what you are dealing with. You should get the gist pretty quickly.

 

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi debbie

 

Welcome to CAG

 

The guys will be happy to advise as soon as they are available.

 

What you have received from RLP is an invoice. As you have highlighted the product was returned undamaged. To date Boots haven't taken anyone to court,

they are in the process of doing so. CAB have done reports where they feel the way RLP and retailers pursue individuals for monies is unfair as they are

speculative, regardless of any actual loss. The only way you might be able to prevent your family is to ask the post office to stop your personal mail and collect it from the delivery office personally. Again don't speak to them over the phone, just send recorded letters. It might be an idea to visit your local CAB office see if they can assist.

 

http://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/unreasonable_demands.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

they can do nothing to you.

 

ignore them and get on with your life

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for being a bother but this is really worrying me. I would like to ignore thme but am afraid of the consequences particularly as their letters are extremely threatening in tone. Please advise what would happen if I ignore them or send them a recorded delivery saying I can't pay and they must take whichever action they deem appropriate

Debbie 4

Link to post
Share on other sites

real court letters are not threatening

 

thats what they pray on

people beieving their threat-o-grams

 

they can do nothing to you

 

no RLP has ever gone to court

 

totally ignore everything

it'll get a bit more scary when a dca then a 'fake' solicitor writes too you

 

but just hold your nerve

 

you might even get the great white solicitor phonig you to threaten all manner of nasty things

like killing you cat and un-burying your great grandma

fact of the matters is they can do nowt too you

 

just read those CAB reports

that'll put straight

 

sleep tiht

they've had their 15mins of fame.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx100uk . You have really set my mind at rest. I feel a good bit better now. I have hardly slept for the last four months and been absolutely sick with worry. I appreciate you taking the time to respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no RLP has ever gone to court

 

:roll:

 

That may be true, literally, but in how many of the cases where proceedings were indeed issued, was the judgement achieved by default, and in how many did the defendant cave in by admitting or settling, before the hearing?

 

If the intention is to suggest that they never proceed, I call it a deliberate deception.

 

They do proceed if need to be and in the mean time a paucity of proceedings proves that RLP is wonderfully effective. The court service especially instructs to do everything possible to avoid the need for a case to be heard, so this is what we get.

 

The cost to the taxpayer, if every case had to go to court would be enormous.

 

:cool:

 

P.S.

 

To see the other side of the story, read this:

 

http://www.lossprevention.co.uk/pdf/Richard%20Mawrey%20QC%20Advice%202.pdf

 

Then decide for yourself who tells the truth, legal counsel or the CAB.

Edited by perplexity
PS
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...