Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi unclebulgaria67,  yes this is a review,  she doesn't really see the GP much as such, its only med reviews and if she is unwell apart from the diagnosed illnesses, she sees nurses for the diabetes checks etc, there is nothing new they can offer her so its a matter of managing and getting through the best she can, which is where I come in as her carer.  She had 12 months cbt for bipolar back in 2009, there are no new things added to cbt so there is nothing they can teach her there, her fibromyalgia is treated with pain relief, there is no nhs physical treatment as only a specialised massage is thought to help but the relief is short lived so the nhs don't provide it (understandably) there is no cure for the condition and we have tried everything.  I will just do my usual best and be there for any assessment which I will request is recorded and hope for the best. Thank you for replying.
    • I have not used a comparison site for some time now... Do they really pass your info on? When it says "we sometimes use your information for third parties to make your life better..."  Basically we just sell your data to anyone who wants it?! 
    • Well who hasn't had a few debts passed on eh?!  And who really wants to give the light of day to any of these scumbags. I accumulated 35+ yellow tickets NTK when parking at my shop premises and they have definitely ben passed on now, not that I care, because in my opinion they should never have been granted access to patrol that car park. 
    • I've asked you a number of questions in my post and you haven't addressed them. Please would you do this. It's a bit difficult having to chase people for answers all the time   Just to add to my original doom and gloom scenario, even if the vehicle is returned to you and you accept it – if it happens to you have received any parking fines or anything else during the period which it has been out of your possession, then you could also be challenged for that. If the purchaser does contact you again and you eventually decide to accept the return of the vehicle, I certainly wouldn't do it without having first ascertained the name and address of the purchaser – and verified this by some evidence – and also get a signed statement that they were indeed in possession of the vehicle from XXX date until XXX date. All very complicated and distasteful – but I'm afraid that this is the consequence of what your daughter has done
    • Not really. The signs have to go where they are practical. Every single yellow should have a time plate, and the motorist has to look for it - you can just say you couldn't see it. If it's there, and I assume the CEO took a photo of it, then the driver has neglected his obligation to find out what the restriction is before parking.   The only way you might be able to argue this is if the sign is next to a separate stretch of yellow line - eg, separated from the one he parked on by, say, a road junction or a parking bay. Every individual stretch of line needs its own sign.
  • Our picks

tillers

Help please letter from Cobbetts

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4872 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi All

I have recently responded to Cobbetts and the courts with Allocation Questionnaire and letter against there defence. Have recived today I quote

 

'We note your comments on our request for Further information. It is our clients contention that your particulars of claim did not particularise your claim. For example, our client cannot properly defend a claim where you have not given the details of each charge you claimis disproportiante and unreasonable.

 

The court is bound by an overriding objective to deal with cases justly and ensure thast parties an equal footing. It was clearly the case that our client could not respond to your claim where you did not provide sufficent particulars. Our client therefore objects to your allegation that the Request is intimidating'

 

What exactly does this mean, I believe I have followed the protocol as per this site and now concerned it may fall apart at thie last hurdle.

 

:mad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dont worry, its just another one of their delaying tactics, I got one, but I received mine befor the A/Q


CHRIS WATKINS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

 

i used this ( taken from posts on the forum)

 

hope it helps

 

 

 

 

Name xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Address xxxxxxxxx

Address xxx

County xxx

Post code

Cobbetts LLP

Ship canal House date xxxxxxxx2006

King Street

Manchester

M2 4WB

Your Ref: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Particulars of claim

 

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam: IN THE NORTHHAMTON COURT

Claim No: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Account Name: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Account number: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sort Code: xxxxxxxxxx

I acknowledge the receipt of the defence posted on behalf of National Westminster Bank plc.

 

1. The Claimant has an account ("the Account") with the Defendant which was opened on or around xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

2. During the period in which the Account has been operating the Defendant debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant and also charged interest on the charges once applied. The Claimant understands that the Defendant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the Claimant.

 

3. A list of the charges applied is attached to these particulars of claim.

 

4. The Claimant contends that:

 

a) The charges debited to the Account are punitive in nature; are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the Defendant; exceed any alleged actual loss to the Defendant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant; and are not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the Defendant which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

 

b) The contractual provision that permits the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of the Unfair Contract Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (1999), the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the common law.

 

5. Accordingly the Claimant claims:

 

a) the return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of £xxxxxx and £ xxxxxx interest.

 

c) Court costs £xxxxxxx

 

d) Interest pursuant to section 69 County Courts Act as set out on the attached list of charges or at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just.

I am not prepared at this stage to answer the CPR Part 18 Request. I anticipate that the claim will be allocated to the small claims track and would not then expect to have to deal with a Part 18 request since these are specifically excluded under Part 27 unless the court specifically orders me to do so of its own initiative

 

I believe that the contents of these particulars of claim are true

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...