Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sorry, another dispute regarding Deposit. Private Letting of House


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4659 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good afternoonI rented a house out from June 2005 and left in May 2011. Im now having an issue obtaining any of my deposit back from my landlady. she has cited a number of issues after i have left which she has said is why im not entitled to my deposit back.Firstly:A missing washing machine. When we arrived in this house the landlady adivsed that there was a machine machine in the kitchen but that this had been left by the previous tenants. She said therefore she would take no responsibility for it if it breaks down. After a couple of years (2009 i believe) it did. and rather than mention it to the landylady i just went out and purchased a new one. When i left, i took this washing machine with me based purely on the fact that the landlady said she wasnt responsible for the old one due to the fact that it was left by the previous tennant. So some of my deposit has gone to buying a new washing machine so im told.Secondly.Due to the really bad weather over christmas and new year, some of the decking on the driveway had come loose. She mentioned that she has had to have someone out to repair this which again is coming out of my deposit. I cant find anything in writing to say i was responsible for issues like this, so am not sure whether it is resonably expected of me to have to pay for these costs (which also included the trimming of a large tree in the front garden also im told by the LL)Thirdly.Living room carpet. It wasnt great when we moved in, there were stains on this and it was quite an old carpet. This carpet when i left was no worse than when we moved in as far as im concerened apart from the usual wear and tear. Landlady said i should pay for the cleaning of this carpet, but on looking through the window of this house i was in, its in fact a new carpet thats been laid.When i left the house, she told me within a week that the house was in great condition and she was really pleased with it. She confirmed to me what my final rent was (as we left mid month) and said that upon receipt of this, she would release my deposit from one of these "schemes"To cut a long story short i chased and chased for 8 weeks for this and in the end had to do some reseach to get her "new" address which i didnt initially have the details of. So i sent a letter to her as she had ignored all my texts and voicemails stating that i was unhappy about a lack of communication regarding my deposit. This is when she hit me with all the problems outlined above.Ive currently written a further letter stating that im not happy, and outlining my arguaments against all of the problems but have not yet sent this off. So im just trying to find out really whether i have any chance of getting this put right or whether im probably flogging a dead horse and just put it down to experience

EDIT - I did lay this out with proper paragraphs and spacing, no idea why it posted like this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) Washing maching is a slightly tricky one. She cant have it both ways - she either supplied it and was responsible for it, or she did not and was not. In any event, she certainly wouldnt be able to claim the full cost of a new washing machine bearing in mind it was 6 years old at the end of the tenancy. I would have said the value able to be claimed (even if she can) would be nominal - otherwise this would be betterment, which isnt allowed. 2) Did you inform the landlady of the damaged decking when it was damaged? The tree, if you hadnt kept it cut back properly etc yourself, you are probably responsible for. 3) Without seeing the carpet difficult to say, but it sounds like no claim on this one is possible. Was an inventory completed and signed by yourself when you moved in? 4) Yep, the formatting is well and truly bust on here dont know why!

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My comments only apply if the premises are entirely within England and Wales, and you were granted a shorthold tenancy (under which you - and your spouse/partner/children, if any - have exclusive use of a seperate dwelling, which is not shared with another tenant nor with the landlord), and you were over 18 years of age when the tenancy was granted, and the rent is less than £2,083 per month.

 

This posting is supplemental to the information in this forum's "sticky" threads and is NOT to be read in isolation.

 

 

Tenancy Deposit

 

If you paid a deposit before 2007, the tenancy deposit scheme does not apply:

 

Tenancy Deposit Scheme

 

 

If the tenancy has ended you can sue for the return of your original deposit, as a contract debt, in the county court.

 

It's likely that a landlord, faced with a claim for repayment of the deposit, will allege disrepair by the tenant in order to try to persuade the court to let him keep it.

 

 

Tenant's Repairing Obligations

 

The tenant has a duty to treat the property in a 'tenant-like manner'. This is defined by the Court of Appeal in the leading case of Warren v Keen [1953] 2 All ER 1118, CA.

 

Basically, the tenant must take proper care of the premises, and must repair damage to the premises caused, wilfully or negligently, by him, his family, or his guests.

 

But if the house falls out of repair owing to fair wear and tear, lapse of time, or any reason not caused by him, then the tenant will not be liable to repair it.

 

 

If the landlord alleges damage, he must prove it.

 

If there is no check-in inventory, the landlord really doesn't have a leg to stand on; so the tenant is in a stronger position where there is no check-in inventory.

 

The landlord is not allowed to improve the premises through "betterment" (replacing an old or worn item with a brand new one).

 

Likewise, the tenant is not liable for the cost of cleaning or repairing an item which was already soiled or damaged before the tenancy began. A check-in Inventory can be evidence that an item was already in bad repair before the start of the tenancy.

 

 

Also read this document - Fair Wear and Tear

 

It explains some aspects of the law regarding fair wear and tear, applying the principle that a tenant is NOT liable to pay for the cost of remedying ordinary wear and tear.

 

This link gives examples of what is fair wear-and-tear, and what is not:

 

http://www.rta.qld.gov.au/print_page.cfm?menuItemId=510.00

 

 

Any deposit paid at the beginning of the tenancy belongs to the tenant. So the burden is on the landlord to prove that any deduction from it is justified.

 

Read the FAQ about what deductions the landlord can lawfully make from the deposit -

 

Unfair deposit deductions

 

 

There is a vast amount of additional information about the tenant's legal rights in cases of disrepair on the website of Shelter, the housing charity -

 

Repairs and Bad Conditions

 

 

 

Letter Before Action

 

If you intend to sue, then once the tenancy has terminated you can consider whether to write a letter before action [LBA], threatening to sue, giving the traditional 14 days notice.

 

This is what you might say -

 

Dear Sir,

 

Premises at _______________________

 

With regard to my tenancy, I require you to refund to me the full rent deposit which I paid, in the sum of £_____.

 

If I have not received the total amount of £_____ within fourteen days from the date of this letter I will commence a claim in the County Court for that amount without further notice to you.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Keep a photocopy of the letter. Send the original by 1st Class post, and obtain a free 'Certificate of Posting' at the Post Office counter when you hand it over.

 

 

Court Forms

 

Form N1 is for claiming the original deposit only.

 

Money Claim Online is a cheaper online method of claiming on form N1.

 

 

The current Court fees are set out at:

 

Court Fees

 

 

Read the Court Service's leaflet How do I make a court claim (Form EX302), which contains detailed guidance on suing in the County Court.

 

Also, the Business Link website provides much useful information about pursuing a County Court case.

 

 

The outcome of a Court case is never certain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...