Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Calm Down please.... there is only one way to deal with this and that is - PROPERLY. Being surrounded by 'lawyers' who deal with 'disputes', just like going to the likes of CAB, in this instance has, most probably, to date,  sadly not helping you here. Such people always project an Aura of confidence, when the truth is they don't actually have the vast successful experience of the members here in dealing with the likes BMW. there are over 350 threads here . as far i gather this is the situation, In April, a car was purchased by your son from BMW. Finance taken out to purchase it has since been paid in full, as well as full payment for an annual Insurance policy. within 6 weeks, it was discovered and confirmed in writing, via a report from a local garage, that the car indeed had numerous performance modifications undertaken. Namely being remapped and with modifications to the exhaust system. having contacted his ins co, they require a further £5k to uprate his policy, without it renders the existing insurance policy invalid, thus the car is not being driven.  again within this 6 weeks, you wrote to BMW rejecting the car (we need to see this letter please. scan it up to PDF, please read our UPLOAD guide). at first BMW were onboard, even sending their own inspector, confirming the mods etc. but in the last 9 days since said inspection, comms have now gone dead. .................. you have 2 options - 1 - allow BMW to sort the car FOC and without hassle to him, but probably within their own snails pace timeframe. 2- EVENTUALLY bring legal action - this would most probably be under contract law, not a claim under the consumer rights act . (as financially you would lose out big time) to do 2. which is not easy and rather complex to calculate the financial sum involved...... we need all the info @BankFodder has requested. of many, but one good reason for this is say for this new mot, show the old one was suspect, good bargaining chip against 2500mls usage deductions... your call but you need to do this properly or not at all...............    
    • Hi, I've been reading through many of the stories in the sub-forum and I understand the process to be to send a Letter of Claim to the EVRi - in the post and to their customer support email and to sign up for MCOL.  I have looked at the various Letters of Claim and the MCOL claim forms - particulars of claim and I have gone through all of the screens on MCOL website to put in the final details so it is ready to go after the 14 days from when I send the Letter of Claim (of course assuming that EVRi dismisses my Letter of Claim to pay me in full!).  I also see the advise is to decline any mediation particularly because I have specified the parcel contents and value to EVRi when shipping it. I have put both the Letter of Claim and the forms from the MCOL particulars of claim into a single PDF for review.  The stories in the sub-forum often indicate people shipping with EVRi but some purchase through or have involved such companies as Parcel2Go and so I wasn't sure about the statement I made in the Letter of Claim if it was totally accurate to say "I am applying my third party rights under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999"? I just wanted to confirm the correct wording.  In my case the parcel shipment was paid for on the EVRi website and sent at the Tesco EVRi Parcelshop.  On the MCOL claim form I have referenced Section 57 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 in response to EVRi customer service hiding behind their lack of ability to insure delivery of laptops and their bogus non-compensated and prohibited items as a means to avoid any responsibility for them losing such items. Thank you for taking a look to see if there are any inaccuracies or amendments to the Letter of Claim - when it is looking good I will send via email and post it to EVRi.  Having drafted the particulars of the claim on MCOL, I shall be ready to submit the claim on the MCOL site when the 14 day period has elapsed and proceed from there.   Thanks for everyone's help! Letter of claim and MCOL Particulars of Claim.pdf
    • Wow quite surprised by your response in all honesty as I can’t see where you have requested details of the car. The car is insured and that was budgeted for and paid in full, the increase of £5k is because of the modifications, which no we didn’t budget for as we didn’t plan to buy a modified car, so no that doesn’t form any part of wanting to return the car, perhaps you don’t understand the impact modifications have on insurance premiums? Thanks for your help so far but feel going the legal route probably suits us better.
    • new thread created for the court claims. please complete this twice and i'll make another thread from the 2nd PDL Claimform we need to keep them sep.  
    • Most banks do not have any customer service staff available to support those opening a new current or savings account, according to research for Investec Bank.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Need help with Natwest credit card


FMZ
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2508 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have a natwest credit card which has a balance outstanding of £4863. We were experiencing financial problems due to health and job losses in 2008 and 2009. I wrote to Natwest along with all my other creditors and offered them a monthly payment of £70. The minimum payment at the time was about £120 and I couldnt afford it. I got a letter back saying they were issuing a default notice.

 

The account had been open since 1997 and maintained properly until 2008, they agreed to accept the £70 for six months freezing interest and charges but did say that it was below their acceptable minimum. But in the same letter they advised that the £70 was unacceptable and they were issuing a default - the arrears at date of the default were £81.

 

I have been making the payments they ask for every month without fail. They review my account every 6 months and the balance has reduced from 6754.07 to the above since October 2009. I got a letter last week saying that as I had failed to respond to the previous demands they had no option but to commence legal proceedings against me. I rang them as I hadnt had any contact with them apart from a telephone call to say that my payment for June had not arrived - it arrived the next day (still within the month and on my statement it said thanks for faster payment) and they eventually apologised and said the threatening letter was sent in error, would be raised for internal investigation and that was the end of it but I am not sure that I trust them now.

 

Anyway that letter got me annoyed (I have done everything I was supposed to do i.e. asked for help, being making payments and fully intend paying back my debts) so I started searching for help and now I am totally confused.

 

I have looked back through statements and have paid charges of over the amount of the arrears quoted at time of default so is this default even legal?

 

I was going to write to them to express my annoyance at receiving the threats in the above letter but should I do that?

 

Has anyone been successful in reclaiming charges against Natwest?

 

I HATE having a default on my file as I did everything I was supposed to do and wasnt even in three months arrears at the time I received the notice. I am basing that on the fact the arrears was £81 as I cant find the statements relating to that period. I owe almost £20k on another credit card, have been making the payments I arranged to make and despite being five or six months in arrears they have just frozen the interest and put a notice on my file that I am on a payment arrangement that is up to date. They didnt issue a default yet I owe them a whole lot more money. :|

 

Can anyone clear my muddled brain and tell me what I should do?

 

Thanks a mil.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Its annoying I know. The default relates to the original terms of the account. You have defaulted and they are within their rights to default you. As annoyed as you feel (I've been in the same place) a DN is actually better for you longer term than an AP as it drops off your CRA file after 6 years whereas an AP (arrangement to pay) stays on forever. It does mean that they can (and will) teminate the account and then sell it on. If they sell it on with an arrangement to pay in place and interest froizen at zero then that is what should stay. DCAs are actaully easier to deal with longer term as they are inclined to accept F&Fs which OC's are not. They sell it on for tax purposes (I believe courtesy of Brigs!). I know it stings when you have done everything you can. Try not to take it personally. You are a bunch of numbers on a piece of paper and they do this with everyone. Others will be along and you can start to look at your options moving forward.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its annoying I know. The default relates to the original terms of the account. You have defaulted and they are within their rights to default you. As annoyed as you feel (I've been in the same place) a DN is actually better for you longer term than an AP as it drops off your CRA file after 6 years whereas an AP (arrangement to pay) stays on forever. It does mean that they can (and will) teminate the account and then sell it on. If they sell it on with an arrangement to pay in place and interest froizen at zero then that is what should stay. DCAs are actaully easier to deal with longer term as they are inclined to accept F&Fs which OC's are not. They sell it on for tax purposes (I believe courtesy of Brigs!). I know it stings when you have done everything you can. Try not to take it personally. You are a bunch of numbers on a piece of paper and they do this with everyone. Others will be along and you can start to look at your options moving forward.

 

Thank you so much for coming on and answering my queries - I thought no one was going to help me and wasnt quite sure why :-)

 

I think I am more worried now lol. Do you mean that MBNA who I have the arrangement to pay with will sell on that debt? They have said they are happy with my account and as long as it is paid every month they wont do anything. And when you say the arrangement to pay stays on forever does it not drop off when the account has been paid off and closed? Or is it six years after that?

 

Sorry I am very new to all of this and to be honest it scares the daylights out of me. Yeah you are right - I shouldnt be annoyed as I did default but I just thought that banks would be willing to help if you had genuine reasons and had been a good customer. You live and learn though right?

 

I am guessing I should start to reclaim charges though or am I barking up the wrong tree?

 

Thanks for your help :-)

Edited by FMZ
Link to post
Share on other sites

I copied the below from a 200 entry old post -which I cant now find. The person writing the post credited the below to The Shadow so I hope I havent done anything wrong by copying it here. I tried to link to the post but I am not allowed as I dont have enough posts.

 

I was hoping someone could explain if this might apply in my case. I have a Natwest default that was issued when my arrears were £81. I have to send a SAR request but from statements I have found I paid £120 in £12 charges in the two years prior to the default when my hubby lost his job etc and we had financial problems. Could this mean that if I am successful in reclaiming my charges that the default is not legitimate and should be removed as the balance on the default notice was related to an account with unlawful charges on it?

 

 

14. Furthermore, the Arrears Total outlined cannot be accurate, as the Balance on the Account was at least partly comprised of Unlawful Charges plus additional Charges and interesticon added unlawfully whilst the Account was in Dispute. Therefore, the Arrears claimed cannot be accurate, as they are themselves calculated using a Total that was itself inaccurate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

credit cards/loans/mortgages yes

 

bank accounts no chance!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

credit cards/loans/mortgages yes

 

bank accounts no chance!

 

dx

 

Yes it is a Natwest credit card. I have had the account since 1997, made most if not all the payments until hubby lost job and then had to start juggling but kept fairly up to date with it . It was only when I asked them to help by letting me pay a lower amount that they defaulted the account. I should have just kept paying as much as I could afford which was about £20 or £30 less than the min figure and let them charge me rather than getting a default.

 

So should I hit them with the SAR first, reclaim charges and then try to sort out default? Or do you want to point me to a thread on that? I have used the search key where i found that 200 plus post from 2008 but I cant find specific information to Natwest.

 

Thanks a mil for replying :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying too Jogs. It is a credit card. My badly made point is that I wouldnt have a default if the charges were recredited as the charges I have paid are more than the amount of the default and thats before I get the SAR sorted i.e. only from the few statements I kept. I was trying to keep up payments but every month was a little short which is why I got hit by the £12 virtually every month for one year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying too Jogs. It is a credit card. My badly made point is that I wouldnt have a default if the charges were recredited as the charges I have paid are more than the amount of the default and thats before I get the SAR sorted i.e. only from the few statements I kept. I was trying to keep up payments but every month was a little short which is why I got hit by the £12 virtually every month for one year.

 

What I would do (and this is what I'd do) Is request the full refund of all charges on the account and the removal of the default. I would make this a LBA and gibe them 14 days to comply. Should they not be forthcoming, I would hit them with a Court claim for the charges and removal of the default on the grounds that it was made up of unfair charges.

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I would do (and this is what I'd do) Is request the full refund of all charges on the account and the removal of the default. I would make this a LBA and gibe them 14 days to comply. Should they not be forthcoming, I would hit them with a Court claim for the charges and removal of the default on the grounds that it was made up of unfair charges.

 

Jogs

 

Thanks Jogs - can I ask you one more question please. I assume I should first do a SAR though as I dont know how much in charges I have paid since the account was opened in 1997?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Jogs - can I ask you one more question please. I assume I should first do a SAR though as I dont know how much in charges I have paid since the account was opened in 1997?

 

Yes, if you don't have a full history then SAr them. Be prepared for them to only send 6 years worth of statements (charges) though.

 

They really should have EVERYTHING from when the account was opened, but they flout this rule all the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

 

the situation is:

 

if you can PROVE the default charges were solely responsible for the over limit, then if you reclaim, the default markers must be removed as they have shot themselves in the foot

 

however, if you were already overlimit because of YOUR spending, then , no you stand no chance, the charges just put you futher over the limit

 

you cant sum all the charges up, remove that balance from the outstanding and then claim its under credit limit, so remove the markers please.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you thank you and thank you :lol:

 

Thats the first time I have smiled about this account in a long time. I found a letter in the template library I will use and see how I go. Thank you again Jogs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

 

the situation is:

 

if you can PROVE the default charges were solely responsible for the over limit, then if you reclaim, the default markers must be removed as they have shot themselves in the foot

 

however, if you were already overlimit because of YOUR spending, then , no you stand no chance, the charges just put you futher over the limit

 

you cant sum all the charges up, remove that balance from the outstanding and then claim its under credit limit, so remove the markers please.

 

dx

 

Thanks DX - I hadnt used the account in ages. As far as I know I never exceeded the credit limit but I couldnt always pay the full amount of the min repayment. So I would have to pay £12 one month and then the minimum payment in month two would be a higher amount as it includes the bit you missed from the last month so I would get hit by another £12 charge that time as well. So I think the £81 was charges - I will get the SAR and check though.

 

They issued a default notice when I sent them an income and expenditure spreadsheet and an offer of £70 per month as they said the offer wasnt acceptable. That happened in October 09 and then the default was registered in December 09 when they froze interest and charges.

 

 

Thanks again to you and Jogs for helping me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

great poss looking good then.

 

if you were not overlimit, spent nowt, then found you were overlimit, then it must be because of charges, so you should be able to get them recinded.

 

obv is not as simple as that, because you have re-occuring purchase int to include, but its worth a punt, even if for the charges reclaim

 

dont forget ppi too?

 

dx

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

 

i did

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

great poss looking good then.

 

if you were not overlimit, spent nowt, then found you were overlimit, then it must be because of charges, so you should be able to get them recinded.

 

obv is not as simple as that, because you have re-occuring purchase int to include, but its worth a punt, even if for the charges reclaim

 

dont forget ppi too?

 

dx

 

dx

 

Thanks DX

 

I dont have PPI on anything (at least I did something right lol) and I am useless with excel but I think I can get someone to work it out for me :-)

 

Will get onto the SAR thing first though and make sure I get all information right back to 1997

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

AFAIK no-one can bad rep you bar a select few.strange

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pity that you did not take this up with the FOS in 2009,from what you say it looks like they were in breach of the banking code,and you were treated quite unfairly.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX.

 

I just wanted to see if the blob came up green or grey!

 

Yours was green, but my last 5 were grey and my rep points stayed at 992!

 

Strange!

 

After 5 subsequent blocks do appear a lighter green.

Not sure what you mean by grey-there are no grey ones.

I will take a look at your rep stats to make sure all is in order there.

But just to give you a heads up-the more rep a user has who is giving it,the more points the recipient will get added.

A user giving rep who has only a small count themselves therefore may not affect your rep points count.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jogs your rep count is now 1042.

You probably wont see that until you log out and back in again-but I just checked and can see.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Martin, I noticed it went up when DX repped me.

 

On the rep list, most of the blocks on the left are green and then there is a comment.

 

The last few have been grey and then a comment (always good) but the rep points stayed at 992.

 

That 992 didn't go up until repped by DX earlier. The OP I think then repped me but I got another grey block by his comment.

 

Maybe its because they are mostly new posters!

 

Jog

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...