Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Employment/Work and asscioated benefits woes


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2961 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

As predicted my wages were wrong, they've not paid any wages at all and my holiday pay is incorrect.

 

I've had another letter from them saying they are "still prepared to resolve". I have a sneaking suspicion this is something to do with the fact the girl who replaced me quit because they changed the hours, again. They are advertising the job again.

 

The fact that I got my p45 in the post two weeks ago contradicts this letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what does your P45 say regarding final pay, is that incorrect inasmuch as it doesnt include the monies outstanding or are they treating the monies due as some sort of tax free severance pay (they save a few bob on NI and pension contributions that way as well as not having to send off stuff to HMRC for updating your tax records)

basically a LBA, give them a fortnigh to sort it out and then sue for unlawful deduction of wages/breach of contract for the balance due.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what does your P45 say regarding final pay, is that incorrect inasmuch as it doesnt include the monies outstanding or are they treating the monies due as some sort of tax free severance pay (they save a few bob on NI and pension contributions that way as well as not having to send off stuff to HMRC for updating your tax records)

basically a LBA, give them a fortnigh to sort it out and then sue for unlawful deduction of wages/breach of contract for the balance due.

 

Final pay is showing correct with the payslip. On the payslip they've added my full months wage but then deducted all of it. They've failed to take into account the cut off/payment in arrears. I am missing two weeks wages.

 

I've filled my formal grievance and they are "investigating your allegations". I've not heard a peep for a week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add, when I started this job they deducted money for uniform which is "refundable when uniform is returned". The uniform was left on site (there was no one for me to give it to). They have failed to refund this. I took dated photographs of the uniform left onsite

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you give them a time limit? If not, give them another week and send a properly constructed lba and make sure that a proper time limit is set, 14 days is normal but you could make it 7 or 28 depending on how the pay cycle works.

Lay out your complaint and say exactly how much money is owed and why (ignore tax liabilities) and in the time scale you set make it clear you expect payment by that date or else a denial and breakdown of what they think is correct

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you give them a time limit? If not, give them another week and send a properly constructed lba and make sure that a proper time limit is set, 14 days is normal but you could make it 7 or 28 depending on how the pay cycle works.

Lay out your complaint and say exactly how much money is owed and why (ignore tax liabilities) and in the time scale you set make it clear you expect payment by that date or else a denial and breakdown of what they think is correct

 

Will do. He's emailed me saying their doing "stage 1 of the investigation on the 15/2/16"

 

I smell a stall to put me outside of time limits..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

So, a month after putting in my grievance I've not heard a peep from

The employer aside from an acknowledgement. I've then started conciliation with acas. So then he decides to get his finger out and I've recieved this:

 

 

Following on from my e-mail below, I have completed my investigation with the Management Team who work from our Branch office and now need to arrange a meeting with you, to discuss your grievance in greater detail.

 

I am aware that you have approached ACAS and entered into Early Conciliation; I have discussed the current situation with them and they are aware I will intend to hold a Grievance Hearing/Meeting with you.

 

I have the following dates available: 25/02/16: 29/02/15 and 01/03/16. Would you be available to meet with me on one of theses dates? If so, I understand you live in the x area, so we have two options:

 

Hold the meeting in our Manchester Branch Office.

 

Hold the meeting in a suitable place of your suggestion at a suitable time.

 

In order for me to formally write to you, please give this e-mail your urgent attention and let me have your preferential location, time and dates for the meeting.

 

 

 

I have several issues with this. Firstly I am not available on those dates. Secondly, he suggests i come to them, which is inns different city and would incur costs. Costs he is not offering to pay. Secondly, am I obligated to find a suitable location? That's for them surely? Thirdly, am I compelled to attend a meeting when for one month no response has been recieved and the conciliation process has begun?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where was your normal place of work? That should be where the meeting takes place unless they agree in writing to pay your travel and other reasonable costs. They are offering to be flexible so use that flexibility

did you send a lba when suggested or just relied on this?

You could also go back to ACAS and ask to use their facilities

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So, due to the ex employers failure to respond to my Greivance I began early conciliation. Which them prompted th not get their finger out. Meeting is tomorrow and conciliation has been extended by two weeks.

 

I have a little question; is it unfair dismissal or wrongful?

Link to post
Share on other sites

How did the meeting go?

 

He was actually quite reasonable and agreed with lemon all points ie the way this was handled has been a farce. They've made an offer this morning through acas. Close to what I'm asking but I still said no. Every penny or no deal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • dx100uk changed the title to Employment Overtime withheld due to sickness?!
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...